Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(217,651 posts)
Sun Jul 7, 2024, 10:47 PM Jul 7

'Incoherent' immunity decision renders 'Constitution itself unconstitutional': Akhil Reed Amar - Velshi - MSNBC



The Supreme Court this week severely undermined the principle that no one is above the law – a bedrock of our nation’s system of government – with its historic ruling declaring that presidents have absolute immunity for their official acts. In her fierce dissent, Justice Sotomayor accused the conservative majority of making the president a "king above the law."

Eminent legal scholar and one of the most cited by SCOTUS, Yale’s Akhil Reed Amar, joins Ali Velshi to discuss the far-reaching implications of this seismic decision. Not mincing words, he calls it “one of the worst decisions in all of constitutional history.” It’s “not just in violation of the Constitution,” says Amar, “but also incoherent.” - Aired on 07/07/2024.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Incoherent' immunity decision renders 'Constitution itself unconstitutional': Akhil Reed Amar - Velshi - MSNBC (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Jul 7 OP
Can the Supreme Court be sued for malpractice? dchill Jul 7 #1
Disbarred dweller Jul 7 #2
I'll buy that! dchill Jul 8 #3
Wow! Makes sense to me as well! Rhiannon12866 Jul 8 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»'Incoherent' immunity dec...