Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cable News Clips

MagaSmash

(7,341 posts) Sat Jul 6, 2024, 03:05 PM Jul 6

Lawrence Tribe: We cannot 'roll over and play dead' in face of 'astonishing' immunity ruling

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawrence Tribe: We cannot 'roll over and play dead' in face of 'astonishing' immunity ruling (Original Post) MagaSmash Jul 6 OP

And yet we will. They are beating the drums to a made up crisis. Autumn Jul 6 #1

Lawrence Tribe was on the bandwagon flamingdem Jul 6 #2

Say it ain't so dweller Jul 6 #3

Right after the debate flamingdem Jul 6 #4

Thanks! I really appreciate expert legal analyses snot Jul 6 #5

Autumn

(45,829 posts)

1. And yet we will. They are beating the drums to a made up crisis.

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Sat Jul 6, 2024, 03:08 PM

Jul 6

flamingdem

(39,799 posts)

2. Lawrence Tribe was on the bandwagon

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Sat Jul 6, 2024, 03:12 PM

Jul 6

to replace Biden.

dweller

(24,500 posts)

3. Say it ain't so

Reply to flamingdem (Reply #2)

Sat Jul 6, 2024, 03:28 PM

Jul 6

Oh well , Tribe is 82 … older than Joe

Maybe Tribe should step down from political commentary

🤔

✌🏻

flamingdem

(39,799 posts)

4. Right after the debate

Reply to dweller (Reply #3)

Sat Jul 6, 2024, 03:47 PM

Jul 6

As if he doesn't suffer speech issues himself!

snot

(10,649 posts)

5. Thanks! I really appreciate expert legal analyses

Reply to MagaSmash (Original post)

Sat Jul 6, 2024, 04:56 PM

Jul 6

re- S. Ct. opinions, which are often long, complex, and misreported even by well-intentioned reporters, who often fail to grasp the legal nuances or how best to respond.

Reply to this discussion