Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Jay Inslee You are in the Inslee 2020 Group. Only members who have selected Jay Inslee as their preferred Democratic presidential candidate are permitted to post in this Group.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(114,921 posts)
Thu May 23, 2019, 05:10 PM May 2019

Pow! Bam! Inslee delivers a one-two punch of executive power

OLYMPIA — In the final round of bill signing Tuesday, Gov. Jay Inslee unleashed a one-two combo of executive power the likes of which state lawmakers had never seen.

First, he vetoed a sentence repeated in six successive sections of the transportation budget, each time poisoning a different bucket of money for transit.

Then, he ordered $175 million be shifted from five highway projects to removing and replacing culverts impeding the passage of salmon to spawning grounds, and fish to the ocean.

Though separate and unrelated actions, each appears to set a precedent. Inslee’s top advisers Tuesday could not cite another example of a governor vetoing a single sentence in a budget bill or asserting executive authority to redirect such a large sum of transportation dollars absent involvement of lawmakers.

The veto involved grant programs supporting bus service, vanpool programs and other multi-modal projects. Under Inslee, laws have been passed requiring providers of public transit services to stop using gasoline-powered vehicles and switch to ones fueled by electricity or biofuel or other alternatives.

In the bill, lawmakers wrote that “Fuel type may not be a factor in the grant selection process.” This would allow grants to go to entities using gas-fueled vehicles in defiance of the alternative fuels law. The budget, with the language, passed nearly unanimously in both chambers.

Inslee could have vetoed each section — a typical response for problematic language — but that would have wiped out $200 million of transit funding. He wasn’t going to be stymied either.

“In this very rare and unusual circumstance I have no choice but to veto a single sentence in several subsections to prevent a constitutional violation and to prevent a forced violation of state law,” he wrote in his veto message.

https://www.heraldnet.com/news/pow-bam-inslee-delivers-a-one-two-punch-of-executive-power/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pow! Bam! Inslee delivers a one-two punch of executive power (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2019 OP
Smart man. Judicious. Keeps to his vision to green the state while keeping the law constitutional. ancianita May 2019 #1
I like Inslee but... hay rick May 2019 #2
They've had a line item veto in Washington for quite some time. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2019 #3
Very interesting. hay rick May 2019 #4
It's in Wisconsin too. BlueWI Jul 2019 #5

ancianita

(38,371 posts)
1. Smart man. Judicious. Keeps to his vision to green the state while keeping the law constitutional.
Thu May 23, 2019, 05:15 PM
May 2019

Thank you so much for posting this.

hay rick

(8,188 posts)
2. I like Inslee but...
Thu May 23, 2019, 09:33 PM
May 2019

Claiming the authority to veto individual sentences strikes me as perilously close to claiming the right to rewrite legislation. If that claim is upheld, what stands in the way of the authority to remove individual words? Words like "not." I respect Jay's motives but this looks like a terrible precedent.

hay rick

(8,188 posts)
4. Very interesting.
Thu May 23, 2019, 10:34 PM
May 2019

I looked it up and it appears that Washington is indeed one of the few states that allows a line item veto for non-appropriation bills. Such a line item veto can be overridden by a two-thirds vote of the legislature. One practical result is that a governor can rewrite bills with the support of only one-third of the legislature.

I think the risk of abuse outweighs the potential benefit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Inslee 2020»Pow! Bam! Inslee delivers...