What Harris is proposing
Harriss proposal would expand the scope of deferred action protections and use a series of executive actions to address legal obstacles that DREAMers currently encounter as they attempt to obtain a green card:
1) Set up a DREAMers Parole-in-Place Program using the authority granted to the executive branch by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): Because the INA only considers an immigrant eligible for permanent legal status if they have been paroled or admitted to the US, Harris would establish a program that paroles DREAMers. DREAMers who apply and are paroled would be able to pursue a green card if their spouse was a US citizen.
2) Establish a rule asserting that DREAMers were not at fault for any lapse in their legal status: Only immigrants who have been able to maintain a continuous lawful status since theyve arrived in the US are able to apply for a green card and DREAMers are seen in violation of this part of the statute. There is, however, a tenet that says immigrants who fell out of lawful status because of no fault of [their] own are still eligible to apply for legal status. Because DREAMers came to the US as children, Harris would create a policy that deems them not at fault as a rule.
3) Call on the Homeland Security secretary to grant DACA recipients retroactive work authorization: For some DACA recipients, one of the bars to obtaining legal status is the fact that theyve accepted[ed] unauthorized employment. By enabling DREAMers to apply for retroactive work authorization, Harris would give them the opportunity to remove this barrier from an application for legal status.
4) Do away with the three- or 10-year bans that DREAMers face if they try to get a green card at a US consulate in another country: Because they are undocumented immigrants, if DREAMers were to leave the country in order to obtain a green card at a US consulate abroad, they would be hit with a three- or ten-year ban before they could reenter the US. Harriss plan seeks to eliminate this ban, which is waived under extreme hardship. Harris seeks to classify separation from a close family member as extreme hardship, so that DREAMers who attempt to apply for a green card at a consulate would not be affected by this ban.
Harriss plan is seen as a creative one because it leverages power allocated to the executive branch under existing immigration law. Additionally, its a proposal that enables DREAMers who would otherwise be eligible for family or employer-sponsored green cards to actually get them.
Under her proposals, the only people shes putting on a path to permanent residence and then citizenship are people who already qualify for permanent residence for existing law, but face technical obstacles, said Washington University at St. Louis law professor Stephen Legomsky, a former chief counsel of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, who also offered feedback on this proposal.
Additionally, Harriss plan intends to expand the pool of those who could apply for deferred action. Because of how narrow the constraints were for the DACA program, only a select group of undocumented immigrants within a certain age range were even able to participate. Harris would widen the group that could benefit from deportation protections significantly, so it encompasses more people including the parents of legal immigrants.
link -->
https://www.vox.com/2019/6/13/18663029/kamala-harris-dreamers-immigrants-citizenship?utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Posted above are just the bullet points of her plan there is more at the link.