Yes on Initiative 300: Denver measure is a reasonable test of social pot use - Denver Post Editorial

[bluedigger]

In so many ways, Colorado’s experiment with legal cannabis sales has debunked reefer-madness fears of the decades-long U.S. war on drugs. State and local regulations and the industry’s understandable desire to prove it can peacefully coexist here have, on the whole, shown that allowing marijuana for sale hardly leads to widespread ruination.

But the fruits of legalization have brought big change. And we sympathize with criticisms from those alarmed by the prevalence of pot shops and smelly warehouses — and from illegal toking and vaping in the streets and alleys and parks.

And what about gripes from tourists who wish to try some legal Colorado weed, or taxpaying residents unable to use it at home because of pressures from family, condo associations, housing authorities and apartment rules? What about folks who want to enjoy getting high in the same way many imbibe alcohol together? Where are they supposed to go?

Thankfully, a four-year pilot program that would allow restricted use of pot in permitted Denver businesses might yield some relief for the problem of public use, and we ask that voters approve Initiative 300.

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/10/18/yes-on-initiative-300-denver-measure-is-a-reasonable-test-of-social-pot-use/

[Uben]

1. I was there in August....

....in Trinidad. Met a couple of gals who were trying to open a business for that purpose. In fact, I was their first customer to pay for a place to smoke. We hung out with them all day. They had to shut down their shop due to gray areas in the law while we were actually smoking. One of these gals was a marijuana publicist and travels around and talks about the benefits of legalization and making it a little easier for folks to stay legal.