Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General Dissusion is now................. (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 OP
Im afraid all site will become Notjing Values Expect Hillary mylye2222 Apr 2015 #1
Is this the political correctness we hear so much about? yallerdawg Apr 2015 #2
Just a room without a niew, aspirant Apr 2015 #3
Well, doesn't the ToS say we all have to line up behind the nominee Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #4
And I will absolutely and wholeheartedly support the Democratic nominee. yallerdawg Apr 2015 #5
That was my point. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #7
If HRC becomes the nominee aspirant Apr 2015 #6
I'll be spending a lot more time over on DI where we can say what we want about Hillary... L0oniX Apr 2015 #8
that's funny Romeo.lima333 Apr 2015 #9
What's DI? Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #10
http://www.discussionist.com/ L0oniX Apr 2015 #11
thanks n/t Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #13
Think about that for a second ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #14
Yet you defend that GD post Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #16
Where have I defended "that GD Post"? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #17
I'm waiting ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #18
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #19
Still laughing at you ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #20
We know where you stand Ichingcarpenter Apr 2015 #21
If being (DU) "progressive" means ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #22
Why are you posting in this Group then? KoKo Apr 2015 #25
Because I would like to believe there are ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #28
You offensively attacked a Group Member here and made disparaging remarks about other posters KoKo Apr 2015 #30
Perhaps you might want to start the ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #32
You might start with reading the already posted OP's and Replies in this Group KoKo Apr 2015 #33
Are there any OPs discussing plans for ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #34
Dear 1StrongBlackMan: NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #26
Will do. 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #31
Hope and mindlessness is not what founded America Geronimoe Apr 2015 #12
"Hillbots communities"??? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #15
I have posted an OP re. French pundits wiews of your last candidates... mylye2222 Apr 2015 #23
That's bad. After her first Executive Edict, er, Order - Executive Order edgineered Apr 2015 #24
Looks like an innocient mistake to me. stone space Apr 2015 #27
I'm not allowed to post in the special HRC forum tridim Apr 2015 #29

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. Well, doesn't the ToS say we all have to line up behind the nominee
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:27 AM
Apr 2015

as soon as it becomes apparent who it will be?

I imagine a lot of people on here already think it's reached that point, as soon as she announced.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
5. And I will absolutely and wholeheartedly support the Democratic nominee.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:35 AM
Apr 2015

Just like every other time.

We just aren't there yet, are we?

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
7. That was my point.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:55 AM
Apr 2015

To the sort of people who are already going around telling people to fall in line, it already appears to have reached that point.

I also disagree, as you do, but expect that sort of post from here on out from some folks.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
6. If HRC becomes the nominee
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:37 AM
Apr 2015

wouldn't that be the ideal time to focus on our Populist candidates, federal to local, to bolster their support and GOTV?

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
8. I'll be spending a lot more time over on DI where we can say what we want about Hillary...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:14 AM
Apr 2015

without the alert swarm.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
11. http://www.discussionist.com/
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:23 AM
Apr 2015

It's actually calmed down quite a bit ...most of the super dumb assholes have been banned.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
14. Think about that for a second ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:40 AM
Apr 2015


I bet I can think of a bunch of other sites where you "can say what we want about Hillary... without the alert swarm." You'd probably even be welcome ... and if you announced your progressiveness ... they'd probably buy you a drink.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
17. Where have I defended "that GD Post"? ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:53 AM
Apr 2015

Please link to it, or be an adult and apologize.

And regarding my attacking progressives, I will re-post my clarification:

It has occurred to me, perhaps, I should clarify my statement. You will note that whenever I reference "progressive", I consistently place the word in quotations, or preface/modify the word "DU" ... there is a reason why I do this. Specifically, I do it to segment out/separate out, the political progressives from those that seem to have taken root in DU; but, consistently demonstrate a clear distain for the Democratic Party, and more, those that make up its base.

If you find yourself advocating income equality AND championing sacrificing the poor and working classes (i.e., "Let's go over the fiscal cliff!&quot ; then, you are the "progressives" that have no real political home ... at least, not in the Democratic Party.

If you find yourself advocating income equality AND championing sacrificing PoC, women, and the LGBT community (i.e., "Income Equality IS the most important issue of our time&quot ; then, you are the "progressives" that have no real political home ... at least, not in the Democratic Party.

If you find yourself advocating a set of policy goals that begins with "IF" (and that "IF" involves a series of unlikely occurrences) AND criticize Democratic policies (established in the current political environment), as inadequate; but, in their imperfection, do benefit the majority of the poor and working classes (i.e., the ACA, Executive Orders, etc.); then, you are the "progressives" that have no real political home ... at least, not in the Democratic Party.

If you find yourself spending the vast majority of your posts (especially during election season), criticizing Democrats, Democratic candidates, and "other" Democrats for supporting Democrats and/or Democratic candidates; then, you are the "progressives" that have no real political home ... at least, not in the Democratic Party.

If you look into your soul; but more, your actions, and can say the above does not apply to you ... then, you are not the "progressives" that have no real political home ... and are welcome members of the Democratic Party (even when you claim "Democrat", as your 3rd or 4th political descriptor).


Does that clarify things?
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
18. I'm waiting ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:10 AM
Apr 2015

But I really don't expect you to admit that you pulled that out your hind-quarters.

It must be tough having someone point out that there is a reason that you get support for/little push-back on your anti-HRC/anti-Democratic rantings on that other site ... YOU ARE WORKING TOWARDS THE SAME ENDS!



(And yes ... I am laughing AT you!)

Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #18)

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
20. Still laughing at you ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:18 AM
Apr 2015

I will post where I like (or until the hosts see fit to block/ban me), Thank you! (BTW, I think I have only posted once in the HRC Group ... it's not a place I frequent.)

Now care to address the crap you pulled out you butt? ETA: I will, graciously, let you off the hook for the apology, as a recognize you are emotional unable to do so.)

Or, how about my clarification ... I'll wait!

(Still laughing at you!)

ETA: I think my clarification IS/COULD BE a valuable mirror for this group. Far more valuable to, and consistent with, the Group's purpose of "To discuss(ing) and debat(ing) issues, candidates, and strategies related to the promotion of progressive, populist reforms within the Democratic Party", than the constant ranting and outrage. (Others may, differ.)

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
22. If being (DU) "progressive" means ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 10:37 AM
Apr 2015

advocating income equality AND championing sacrificing the poor and working classes (i.e., "Let's go over the fiscal cliff!&quot ; and/or, advocating income equality AND championing sacrificing PoC, women, and the LGBT community (i.e., "Income Equality IS the most important issue of our time&quot ; and/or, advocating a set of policy goals that begins with "IF" (and that "IF" involves a series of unlikely occurrences) AND criticize Democratic policies (established in the current political environment), as inadequate; but, in their imperfection, do benefit the majority of the poor and working classes (i.e., the ACA, Executive Orders, etc.); and/or, spending the vast majority of your posts (especially during election season), criticizing Democrats, Democratic candidates, and "other" Democrats for supporting Democrats and/or Democratic candidates, as has been presented by DU "progressives"; then, ...

you are quite correct ... I am in no way a DU "progressive"!

Thank the universe!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
28. Because I would like to believe there are ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:46 AM
Apr 2015

Progressives on DU, and particularly in this Group, that do not fall into the above-described category ... that wish to reform the Democratic Party, as the purpose represents.

But more, I would like to seek/discuss convincingly workable plans to move American politics further to the Left than this current administration has taken us.

Is that Okay?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
30. You offensively attacked a Group Member here and made disparaging remarks about other posters
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:52 AM
Apr 2015

who are "Progessive." Nothing in your posts spoke about..your quote:


"But more, I would like to seek/discuss convincingly workable plans to move American politics further to the Left than this current administration has taken us."

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
32. Perhaps you might want to start the ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:05 PM
Apr 2015

Exchange timeliness a bit sooner ... like when I was engaged by a false allegation (and not for the first time by my partner in the exchange).

I will refrain from addressing the "attacks" because I have been warned off by, and out of respect for, a/the Host.

Now ... can we discuss convincing and workable plans to move American politics further to the Left than the current Administration has taken us?

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
33. You might start with reading the already posted OP's and Replies in this Group
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:10 PM
Apr 2015

for background of the issues members here feel are important.

If you have your own plans that you would like to see discussed then you should post them in an OP.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
34. Are there any OPs discussing plans for ...
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:40 PM
Apr 2015

Moving American politics further to the Left than the current Administration has?

I guess I'll take your advice and start my own.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
26. Dear 1StrongBlackMan:
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:35 AM
Apr 2015

As a host, I'm going to ask you to be civil to other members who come to this protected group not to bicker but to share productive ideas and, at times, to vent about matters that frustrate us in the search for a better party.

Fights with other members, challenges, mocking, and rofl emoticons really aren't consistent with our purpose.

If you wish, please feel free to simply post your definition of a real "progressive" and be done with it.

Otherwise, please disengage from this particular battle, which would be more appropriate to GD or Politics or another group, but not this one.

Best regards,

NYC_SKP

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
31. Will do.
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:53 AM
Apr 2015

But I must note ... the exchange did not begin with me, though I will own, and therefore, sincerely, apologize for my part of the exchange.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
12. Hope and mindlessness is not what founded America
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:33 AM
Apr 2015

The Hillbots communities are forming and funded by Goldman Sachs, all haters not welcome.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
24. That's bad. After her first Executive Edict, er, Order - Executive Order
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:19 AM
Apr 2015

things will be back to normal. Until then me must do and say as we are being shown, democratic processes be damned.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
29. I'm not allowed to post in the special HRC forum
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 11:51 AM
Apr 2015

Because I'm not special or something.

Well actually I was banned 6 months ago because I asked for details about someone's prediction/guess about something loosely related to Clinton's potential presidential run. They had no details, and I got banned. Genius.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»General Dissusion is now....