Democrats Scrap Primary System, Appoint Hillary Clinton as Nominee
Last edited Sun Mar 1, 2015, 08:39 PM - Edit history (1)
WASHINGTON -- Calling the primary system biased and unreliable the Democratic National Committee announced today that it is eliminating the old fashioned ballot based system used to nominate Democrats for the general presidential election.
Reached for comment, DNCs Debbie Wasserman Shultz explained that primaries confuse voters who are generally unaccustomed to critical thinking and decision making. Rather than bewilder people with so many choices on Election Day, weve narrowed down the field so voters can choose a winning candidate every time. Its an enormous boost to peoples self-esteem knowing they have picked the best possible candidate.
Indeed, the new process revealed by Wasserman Shultz appears to be a major simplification. Dollar bills of various denominations are collected from rank and file subjects and assembled into a large pile. During a sacred midnight ceremony, the Highest Lama, festooned in gilded robes, lights the pile on fire. As crackling orange flames leap high into the sky, a committee of Lesser Lamas studies the resultant smoke, paying close attention to its prevailing direction, inevitably pointing to the Northeast. The Highest Lama ruminates day and night as Lesser Lamas stoke the blaze with dollar bills. The ceremony continues until a reincarnate Clinton appears in a vision, a state known as the golden enlightenment.
From there, the candidates spiritual awakening begins with lessons from monks of Goldmanvishnu. During this time the candidate gives up all worldly principals in order to achieve a Zen state of maximal pragmatism known as The Third Way.
Wasserman Shultz is confident the new candidate will bring needed change. America is Ready for Her Holiness to Complete Her Spiritual Ascension .
For blue ink concerners, here's the link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1277&pid=4381
TheCowsCameHome
(40,210 posts)Think of the time and money we'll save.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)right here in River City, the pretense of freedom is very important. As long as there are two candidates and I get to put my ballot into the machine, I think I am free. Why tell me otherwise? Herr Gen Clapper is spying on me to keep me safe and soon drones will be programed to kill all those that don't agree with us. Wall Street will take all our wealth for our own benefit and dole out what we need to survive (or not).
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Well said. This is exactly what America has become. We don't need a president apologist defending this way of life.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Think of the money saved! Why risk proponents of other candidates saying mean things abut Hillary that the GOP would never have thought of in a jillion years! More like well, the last time there was a primary, didn't turn out so well.....
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)That way, when Hillary makes another embarrassing gaffe, or tells another fib, it'll be too late to do anything about it.
The pressure will be off her and she'll be free to be herself.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But certainly, like Chuck Schumer, I'm in favor of scrapping those unseemly things.
Regards,
TWM
djean111
(14,255 posts)When I took over the [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee] in 2005, we instituted a new policy, we tried to avoid primaries, because primaries are really a killer, Schumer said Thursday at The Atlantics Washington Ideas Forum.
Schumer said that strategy was very successful, resulting in taking over the majority in the Senate in his four years atop the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
He said given Clintons experience and qualifications, other Democrats should get behind her early.
It would be great if Democrats would unite around her early, [if] we not have a primary on the Democratic side and let the Republicans beat the daylights out of each other, Schumer said.
I think the constant bullying is having an opposite effect. Oh, and barf.
Wonder if other potential candidates are being treated to the same inevitability (and thriftiness!) drone that non-Hillary-supporters are being subjected to.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)primary, we often get mocked and called conspiracy theorists. By a certain group within DU, anyway.
When I took over the [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee] in 2005, we instituted a new policy, we tried to avoid primaries, because primaries are really a killer, Schumer said Thursday at The Atlantics Washington Ideas Forum.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/chuck-schumer-elizabeth-warren-2016-elections-99869.html#ixzz3TAVO0MoF
Yet, everyone said in 2008 that a long, hard fought primary benefited Obama and the Party (and probably Hillary, too).
When statements made at different times contradict each other, which statements do you believe?
And primaries are supposedly the one time that rank and file Democrats get to weigh in, even though, since Mondale, they've had to make sure they outweighed Super Delegates when a Presidential is involved.
That link is a great find, Manny.Explains some of the posts I've been seeing at DU for months, too, though I have to say, I've known the two were connected.
I just might make that link my signature line soon. (My current sig seems to be getting more irrelevant with each passing day.) At a minimum, it's worth bookmarking.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)December 2007
'Former President Bill Clinton said Monday that the first thing his wife Hillary will do when she reaches the White House is dispatch him and his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, on an around-the-world mission to repair the damage done to America's reputation by the current president Bush's son, George W. Bush.'
"Well, the first thing she intends to do, because you can do this without passing a bill, the first thing she intends to do is to send me and former President Bush and a number of other people around the world to tell them that America is open for business and cooperation again," Clinton said in response to a question from a supporter about what his wife's "number one priority" would be as president
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/18/bill-clinton-george-hw-bush-will-help-president-hillary/
Her "number one priority", eh? Sure, nothing more important than bilking the US taxpayers for a victory lap of the world by the Bush-Clinton 'family' regime. Notice NOT JIMMY CARTER WHO HAS WORLD WIDE ACCLAIM AS A REAL PEACE MAKER ... but a guy that started two wars one in Panama and one in Iraq.
And this announcement was supposed to help Hillary Clinton get elected in 2008?
Are these people insane?
djean111
(14,255 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)And yet we're supposed to accept her protestations that she is a totally independent entity and that Bill won't be pulling the strings behind the scenes.
I was happy to get rid of him in 2000, and yet here he is, still around.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)....Jenna Bush: Hillary Clinton and I are 'related' through 'Uncle' Bill - George W Bush's 'brother from another mother'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2443961/Jenna-Bush-Hillary-Clinton-related-marriage-uncle-Bill--George-W-Bushs-brother-mother.html
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)and we can't muster up enough principals and courage to demand better than McCandidate McClinton.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)customers at Hobson's stable.
In the cartoon, though, there is a third option: ceasing to be sheeple.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)they look blue and black to me