Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:15 PM Feb 2015

Ready For Someone Else!™

Last edited Tue Feb 10, 2015, 08:38 PM - Edit history (3)

Random synaptic misfire: What if we started a movement called Ready For Someone Else™, and started collecting money for whoever we support when Hillary announces she'll continue to not run through the 2016 elections (or she decides to run and needs to be primaried by an FDR Democrat)?

I think it would be fun.

UPDATE: just acquired readyforsomeoneelse.org. Get this thread up to 100 recs and I'll *do* something with it.

SECOND UPDATE: please, no more recs! Three more and I'm hosed.

THIRD UPDATE: you people suck.

FOURTH UPDATE: uh, uh...

121 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ready For Someone Else!™ (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 OP
Been watching FDR again on PBS ...what a great person he was in spite of a few flaws. L0oniX Feb 2015 #1
Agreed MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #5
The other two would be sgmcenroe Feb 2015 #18
Watch out about Lincoln zipplewrath Feb 2015 #52
Teddy Roosevelt had good and bad also. He was keen on killing animals and fighting against the JDPriestly Feb 2015 #75
War undermined many zipplewrath Feb 2015 #80
TR learned the bitter lesson of war when his son Quentin was killed in WWI. nikto Feb 2015 #93
Humm,, just interesting to me.. pangaia Feb 2015 #86
Not quite as bad zipplewrath Feb 2015 #99
Lincoln, T.R., Hoppy Feb 2015 #19
In 2009, historians rated FDR as Third best, after Washington and Lincoln, whathehell Feb 2015 #68
Fun yes, but more importantly the poor and working classes need protection from those Dragonfli Feb 2015 #2
Think we should do it? nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #7
Without question or hesitation Dragonfli Feb 2015 #8
Well... Let's get 100 recs MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #13
Perhaps an Xpost in GD of some sort would help to whip the Rec goal? /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #14
Perhaps... but The Swarm might cover it MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #22
OT but something about what you said made me think of a scene from Dragonfli Feb 2015 #27
*That* would be General Discussion. nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #29
I think I'll stay in here, I don't have my golf shoes today /nt Dragonfli Feb 2015 #30
It's a lot nicer in here. You can actually discuss issues without the derailing of sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #50
I agree, in fact it is largely due to this group that I decided to become more active again Dragonfli Feb 2015 #55
I'm in, Manny! What can I do? peacebird Feb 2015 #77
But I heard that HRC was "electable" which is much more important than integrity or having rhett o rick Feb 2015 #3
Electable is also code for a giant quid pro quo war chest, but I suppose that is redundant. Dragonfli Feb 2015 #16
Yes money is one tool of the Oligarchs. They have many more. Control of voting machines rhett o rick Feb 2015 #17
I remember when Hillary fans claimed Obama wasn't "electable". Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #78
It worked on Howard Dean in Iowa nt fadedrose Feb 2015 #113
They kept saying that about Kucinich too. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #117
Electable - this is the term that pushed Howard Dean fadedrose Feb 2015 #112
"I hate that word "electable," because it effectively discards integrity as being important. " rhett o rick Feb 2015 #116
lololol - Clinton vs. Bush: as comfortable as an old pair of shoes.... whereisjustice Feb 2015 #4
K&R F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #6
The trouble is that we're already running out of time. Jim Lane Feb 2015 #9
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #10
Expect the unexpected -- ticket of Clooney/Krugman? Jim Lane Feb 2015 #11
. MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #12
... F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #49
Clooney would probably win the single female vote without lifting a finger. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #79
Warren/Stewart is my hope.... druidity33 Feb 2015 #83
Then Bill O'Reilly takes over The Daily Show to make fun of Vice President Stewart. Jim Lane Feb 2015 #85
Stewart/Colbert !!! pangaia Feb 2015 #87
I'm with you. Teddy Roosevelt was nominated as the vice president because he was making JDPriestly Feb 2015 #76
Kick. JEB Feb 2015 #15
I'm in. zeemike Feb 2015 #20
It can't be about money MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #21
I'd even host it :) mwooldri Feb 2015 #23
Love the domain name! moonbeam23 Feb 2015 #24
Gotta hit the rec button to rec MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #25
That certainly is support for the goal, but Manny was also refering to clicking the rec button on Dragonfli Feb 2015 #26
Kick. onyourleft Feb 2015 #28
One-third of the way towards our goal! MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #31
You mean "Ready for a primary challenger punching bag?" McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #32
No. nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #33
Anyone who challenges Hillary will get a boost from the media. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #82
Briefly coming out of temporary retirement, specifically for a Manny rec RufusTFirefly Feb 2015 #34
Just a shnorrer, then? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #48
40th rec Jack Rabbit Feb 2015 #35
Great idea! Bernie Sanders talked about how much money might be collected for 'someone else' sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #36
Great idea. merrily Feb 2015 #37
alright AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #38
Kick! grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #39
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2015 #40
If it were in GD it would. But for a group 58 recs so far is pretty good. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #46
I regret that I have but one Rec to give my country. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #41
Maybe readyforsomeoneelse.org could snag some of these "rogue donors" RiverLover Feb 2015 #42
That's a great link! I had not heard of this. I wondered if there were any wealthy sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #47
We need the churn Fairgo Feb 2015 #43
And kick. nt ReasonableToo Feb 2015 #44
Count me in. djean111 Feb 2015 #45
I'm In... WillyT Feb 2015 #51
Logged on to rec (nt) malokvale77 Feb 2015 #53
My daughter attends an all womens college azmom Feb 2015 #54
83 and a kick. Count me in Manny Autumn Feb 2015 #56
Sorry. mimi85 Feb 2015 #57
First mistake yellowwoodII Feb 2015 #59
Ready for someTHING else. hay rick Feb 2015 #58
rec 93... almost there Voice for Peace Feb 2015 #60
yes. alberg Feb 2015 #61
K & another R... (n/t) mak3cats Feb 2015 #62
Gladly K&R!!! n/t MustBeTheBooz Feb 2015 #63
I for one am MORE THAN READY for Bernie Sanders. NorthCarolina Feb 2015 #64
Same here, NC MissDeeds Feb 2015 #69
Only three more to go, when I get back in the early AM I hope to see Dragonfli Feb 2015 #65
I'm in... K & R freebrew Feb 2015 #66
102 - are you ready to be hosed, Manny? leveymg Feb 2015 #67
I'm assuming the position as I write this. nt MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #71
K&R MissDeeds Feb 2015 #70
+1 Cosmic Kitten Feb 2015 #72
It was…..Inevitable n/t n2doc Feb 2015 #73
Sorry, Manny! blondie58 Feb 2015 #74
deliciously amusing. NuttyFluffers Feb 2015 #81
The first thing to do with the new site is to set up a jury system for comment moderation. (n/t) Jim Lane Feb 2015 #84
Kick !!! WillyT Feb 2015 #88
Here is an odd thought: chknltl Feb 2015 #89
Like the DLC did? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #90
I agree about those big nasty strings. chknltl Feb 2015 #98
Wait... the Kochs might actually cough up cash? MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #102
Hey Manny, sorry for the delay here and a thought. chknltl Feb 2015 #107
I was 154, or maybe 156, I forget. pangaia Feb 2015 #91
I hear Jon Stewart needs a new day job... Fearless Feb 2015 #92
enthusiastic kick for manny. nt navarth Feb 2015 #94
KnR n/t Alkene Feb 2015 #95
Yanis Varoufakis for President Jack Rabbit Feb 2015 #96
Now you've done it, Goldstein. What did Third Way Manny say about this? merrily Feb 2015 #97
I rec'd by accident, before I saw you were the author. Bytheway there is another push pole rhett o rick Feb 2015 #100
" I'm Ready For Lunch " olddots Feb 2015 #101
I'm ready for better than "better than JEB". I flush better than JEB every morning. TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #103
Thead Win! MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #104
Hey Manny RiverLover Feb 2015 #105
That's a good suggestion. There are several Populist groups who are active in trying to get sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #106
It wouldn't surprise me at all that the Party Powers told Sen Warren rhett o rick Feb 2015 #110
Ready for Barbara Lee! Dems to Win Feb 2015 #108
Second! antiquie Feb 2015 #109
++ I really like her nt fadedrose Feb 2015 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author jeepers Feb 2015 #111
"Collecting money" fadedrose Feb 2015 #114
Hey Manny, what's the status of this boondoggle? Er, I mean well meaning boondoggle. rhett o rick Feb 2015 #118
under construction MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #119
http://readyforsomeoneelse.org/ is up: NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #120
Thanks. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #121
 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
1. Been watching FDR again on PBS ...what a great person he was in spite of a few flaws.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:24 PM
Feb 2015

FDR ...one of the top 3 presidents this country has ever had.

sgmcenroe

(30 posts)
18. The other two would be
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:28 AM
Feb 2015

George Washington, cause he could of been king but didn't.
Abraham Lincoln, cause the country would be a whole lot different without him.

zipplewrath

(16,690 posts)
52. Watch out about Lincoln
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:47 PM
Feb 2015

Lincoln's reputation extends predominately from his treatment after being assassinated as anything he actually accomplished as president. He got off to a VERY slow start, and the end result was a very long and drawn out war.

TR probably has as much claim to our modern situation as Lincoln.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
75. Teddy Roosevelt had good and bad also. He was keen on killing animals and fighting against the
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 06:39 PM
Feb 2015

Spanish, but he was a great reformer.

 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
93. TR learned the bitter lesson of war when his son Quentin was killed in WWI.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 09:20 PM
Feb 2015

It was said he was deeply shaken and never the same after his son's death.

Weird to think that up until then, he seems he must have felt, to some degree, some strange kind of invulnerability regarding war.
His feeling towards war was clearly shaped by his swimmingly successful engagements in Cuba.



Quentin's death changed all that, albeit late in TR's life.


pangaia

(24,324 posts)
86. Humm,, just interesting to me..
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 08:15 PM
Feb 2015

" He got off to a VERY slow start, and the end result was a very long and drawn out war.' Could sort of be said for FDR, also.

But,, really a non-sequitor, I know...

zipplewrath

(16,690 posts)
99. Not quite as bad
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:54 PM
Feb 2015

FDR was "in" the war before it was declared. I'm not sure anyone particularly claims that FDR did anything to lengthen the war. Some will suggest he was partially responsible for Japan attacking us. That's a bit complicated, but I'm not sure that particularly "lengthened" anything.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
19. Lincoln, T.R.,
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:28 AM
Feb 2015

Washington, the most important thing he did was to retire after two terms. That stopped the impetus for an imperial presidency. I also respect that he gave form to our government, using the words of the Constitution. He created a government where none existed.

Carter, for his non-aggression.

whathehell

(29,743 posts)
68. In 2009, historians rated FDR as Third best, after Washington and Lincoln,
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:49 PM
Feb 2015

but some considered him 2nd, after Washington.

He was a GREAT president, absolutely, and if you're a Boomer or older, you were

raised with the legacy of his "New Deal" programs, the ones the Repukes are now trying to dismantle.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
2. Fun yes, but more importantly the poor and working classes need protection from those
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:38 PM
Feb 2015

that would bleed the last ounce of blood from them to feed the already engorged super rich vampires that are expecting it from Hillary on a silver platter.

She would have no problems in helping with the bleeding or with acting as their server.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
22. Perhaps... but The Swarm might cover it
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:43 AM
Feb 2015

with poop while scream-yipping like chihuahuas on an ether binge.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
27. OT but something about what you said made me think of a scene from
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:09 AM
Feb 2015

Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas, the lizards in the bar specifically.

Edited to add:

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
50. It's a lot nicer in here. You can actually discuss issues without the derailing of
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:11 PM
Feb 2015

good threads that are becoming standard procedure in GD.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
55. I agree, in fact it is largely due to this group that I decided to become more active again
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 02:41 PM
Feb 2015

Every time I end up in GD I have to answer moronic nonsense (most recently from a pundint that argues like a child - you always hate my friends - you never say anything nice)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. But I heard that HRC was "electable" which is much more important than integrity or having
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:48 PM
Feb 2015

Democratic principles. After all, if we are going to get screwed by the Oligarchy, it might as well be by someone we elect.

*electable is code for "the Oligarchs will let her win"

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
16. Electable is also code for a giant quid pro quo war chest, but I suppose that is redundant.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:13 AM
Feb 2015

It is after all the Oligarchs that let them win via supplying the large war chest used to purchase their candidates.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
17. Yes money is one tool of the Oligarchs. They have many more. Control of voting machines
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:28 AM
Feb 2015

helps make people "electable". Ask Karl Rove.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
112. Electable - this is the term that pushed Howard Dean
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:47 AM
Feb 2015

out of the winning spot in the Iowa primary, which basically ended his run. It was the HC visit and work by her (DLC) supporters that convinced the Iowans not to vote for him - This could be seen so clearly when the debate was televised - and every other Dem candidate (there were many) except for Barbara Lee picked on Dean instead of giving their own views.

I hate that word "electable," because it effectively discards integrity as being important.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
116. "I hate that word "electable," because it effectively discards integrity as being important. "
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 11:53 AM
Feb 2015

Very well said.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
4. lololol - Clinton vs. Bush: as comfortable as an old pair of shoes....
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:52 PM
Feb 2015

that have stepped in some giant piles of shit. They just want an opportunity to clean them off on our carpet.

I'm mean you CAN'T expect them to clean the shit off their own shoes...


 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
9. The trouble is that we're already running out of time.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:30 PM
Feb 2015

The sad reality of American campaigns is that they start earlier and earlier. There's not much time left for a "someone else" to come forward and set up the organization, recruit the staffers and early donors (especially, alas, big donors), etc.

My current highly subjective take on our options:
1. Warren won't run despite "draft" efforts. (If she does run, I'll throw myself into helping her campaign. I'd quit my job... if I had one.)
2. Sanders will run and will run as an FDR Democrat. For several reasons, though, it's hard to see him being nominated or elected. Supporting him might nevertheless have value in pulling the party to the left. I'll certainly vote for him over Clinton if, by the time of my primary, he's her leading opponent.
3. Other people who are likely to mount credible campaigns are Martin O'Malley and Jim Webb. One possibility at this point is for one of them to emerge as a more-or-less-FDRish Democrat and get our support. I think that's unlikely in Webb's case but O'Malley might make the grade.
4. In the next tier, in terms of likelihood of running, is Brian Schweitzer. He seems to be a mix of populist and Western conservative Democrat. I evaluate him as both less likely to run and less FDR-ish than O'Malley.
5. There are plenty of us who are ready for someone else but that fact has not enticed the likes of Sherrod Brown, Russ Feingold, Alan Grayson, or Sheldon Whitehouse into the race. Here's where the time factor comes in. If one of those four or some other progressive were thinking about running, we'd already be hearing about the meetings with donors and strategists, even if not yet the formal exploratory committee. The door hasn't completely closed but I have to rate it as highly unlikely that one of them will run.

Sorry if I sound pessimistic. I am pessimistic. I think Clinton will run and will win the nomination. If she doesn't run, I think Andrew Cuomo will jump in and be an immediate front-runner, and I'd actually rather see us nominate Clinton.

My ideal candidate is something along the lines of O'Malley's bio (executive experience, most electable age group, no S-word on his rap sheet) combined with Sanders's ideology. I expect to be disappointed.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
10. "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:43 PM
Feb 2015

Hunter S. Thompson said that.

We're in weird times now, so I expect the unexpected.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
79. Clooney would probably win the single female vote without lifting a finger.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 06:57 PM
Feb 2015

Maybe he would be willing to run with Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders. They could hire Krugman for Secretary of the Treasury.

If Clooney asked, Warren would probably say yes. What woman could resist him?

I'm a woman, 71, but still a woman. I think I can speak for a lot of women (although maybe not all -- well -- maybe all).

Clooney could win the all categories of women vote -- and maybe a few men too.

But who would need the male vote if Clooney ran. He would insure a Democratic victory.

What he would do in the White House is a big question? But any and every woman would vote for him, and WE ARE IN THE MAJORITY.


 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
85. Then Bill O'Reilly takes over The Daily Show to make fun of Vice President Stewart.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 08:08 PM
Feb 2015

As for your question, I'm sure Jon Stewart could do it. The issue is whether he would. He's probably happier having his own TV show than breaking ties in the Senate.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
76. I'm with you. Teddy Roosevelt was nominated as the vice president because he was making
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 06:48 PM
Feb 2015

life miserable for the corrupt Republicans in his party. At least there is a strong argument for that assertion. Teddy Roosevelt was a problem. The vice presidency was a nothing job.

Teddy Roosevelt ended up being the president and turning the country around. He was stubborn, extremely intelligent and well educated and a fighter.

We need someone like Teddy Roosevelt right now.

And finding him may be a matter of serendipity. Being a runner up in the 2016 race could be a good thing.

Anything can happen now. Scandals are afoot. The world, including the political world is in a state of flux. A number of issues and facts could bring unexpected results.

So I am staying open to the possibility that we could get a Bernie Sanders or an Elizabeth Warren no matter how plump and pretty Hillary's war chest is.

These are strange times. And in strange times, anything can happen.

The middle class is discontent and for good reason.

Jim Webb, Schweitzer -- no way. They just don't cut it. And it is time for a woman.

Elizabeth Warren does not think like a Barack Obama or a Jim Webb. She doesn't really think she could be elected. She could. She probably will no matter how reluctant she is to run now.

Our government is so corrupt, and Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are two rare politicians who are not part of the corruption.

So, anything can happen.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
20. I'm in.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:34 AM
Feb 2015

Not that it will mean anything because I have no money and money is what it is all about.
And ordinary people cannot raise as much as the oligarchs can spend on an election.

Our only hope is a populist that can turn out the people who are fed up with the parties and the control of big money over politics...and that is why they want Clinton v Bush...a choice between two insiders.

mwooldri

(10,386 posts)
23. I'd even host it :)
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:53 AM
Feb 2015

Vote for the Monster Raving Loony Party! You know it makes sense!

Though setting up a political action fund defining who the "Someone Else" should be and when that "Someone Else" turns up - yup shoot out some money in their general direction for their political campaign.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. That certainly is support for the goal, but Manny was also refering to clicking the rec button on
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:02 AM
Feb 2015

the bottom left of the Original post of this thread.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
82. Anyone who challenges Hillary will get a boost from the media.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 07:06 PM
Feb 2015

Because challenging Hillary will be a great story. And Hillary had better realize that before she steps into the race.

Even a Republican challenging Hillary will get a boost simply because he is brave enough to defy the Clinton machine.

But I am telling you that I think that the winning slogan in the 2016 election will be: It's the scandals, stupid.

The corruption in our country has reached such a level that, like an overheated volcano, it has to explode.

Bernie Sanders says he does not and never has run a negative ad. But he won't need to if he runs. The two parties will rush out there to reveal all the corruption. It is very obvious to the insiders. And they will use it against each other this time around.

Mark my words: It's the scandals, stupid.

Hillary has a past. So does Jeb Bush. It's just a matter of when those pasts are brought into the light.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
36. Great idea! Bernie Sanders talked about how much money might be collected for 'someone else'
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:55 AM
Feb 2015

in a speech he made recently.

At Brookings, as he'd done at primary state speeches, Sanders talked openly about a 2016 presidential bid and what it would cost. "If you had 2 million people putting in $100, that's $200 million," he suggested. "Is that enough? I don't know. Maybe the game is over."


I think if he or Elizabeth Warren were running, that would be more than possible. Would it be enough? I don't know, but if not, then we could double it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
47. That's a great link! I had not heard of this. I wondered if there were any wealthy
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:02 AM
Feb 2015

liberals who actually WERE on the right side of issues, like 'getting the money out of politics'. I knew about Ben and Jerry, but compared to the Right, including Third Way, who seem to have endless Corporate donors, the Left seems to have few who themselves are on the Left.

Sagner is a former board member of the influential Democracy Alliance club of wealthy liberals. Its membership — which skews anti-war, anti-money in politics and economically populist — largely turned away from Clinton and toward Obama in 2008. Sources say the club’s current donor pool again includes an ardent anybody-but-Hillary wing. This time around, its underdog rival of choice is Warren, who demurred when she was urged to run after speaking to the club’s annual winter meeting late last year.

Warren’s lawyer has even gone so far as to disavow Ready for Warren. But it’s proceeding anyway, with the two-pronged goal of demonstrating to Warren that there would be sufficient financial support for her campaign and also building political infrastructure around the country that could be tapped by any such campaign. It’s a model similar to — but on a much smaller scale — than the one that Ready for Hillary pioneered early last year.


Manny should click that link because once we get to 100 recs and we're more than halfway there now, we might want to get in touch with them!


Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
43. We need the churn
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 06:43 AM
Feb 2015

Cracking the rusted canard of inevitability...requires options and a contrary mind to consider the possibilities. Even if nothing worthwhile roils to the surface, at least we will have reckoned the depth of our empty rhetoric. I'm in.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
54. My daughter attends an all womens college
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:59 PM
Feb 2015

So I asked her if her school was excited about Hillary running, and her response was "nobody wants Hillary, we want Warren" Smart women!!!

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
64. I for one am MORE THAN READY for Bernie Sanders.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:12 PM
Feb 2015

At this point in time Bernie is the only acceptable candidate to have publicly stated an inclination to run. I love EW, but I love Bernie too, and if he runs, he has my support and my vote.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
65. Only three more to go, when I get back in the early AM I hope to see
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:17 PM
Feb 2015

The discussion about how we will move forward.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
98. I agree about those big nasty strings.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 03:10 PM
Feb 2015

I was sitting in my shrinks office while reading your OP. As he came out to usher me in for my appointment I hit the 'post' button for that post. My doctor wanted to know what was so amusing so i showed him. (He is a Democrat btw, likely a very Progressive one). I have never heard him laugh harder! I figured that you would get a kick out of it too.

Sadly, and it hurts my head to think such thoughts, I had to ask myself if the Koch's would actually invest in Progressives who want to field candidates willing to go up against corporate Dems. The divide and conquer concept would not be lost on them while the cash for a cash starved grass roots movement would not be lost on the 'movers'. What interesting times we live in huh!

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
102. Wait... the Kochs might actually cough up cash?
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 11:31 AM
Feb 2015

I'll need to rethink my position, then. I'm sure that there's a pragmatic solution.

Fortunately, I expect the site to go nowhere, so no moral dilemmas will be faced. But let's give it a shot. These people have been running the Democratic Party for 20+ years, and it's not gone well for us.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
107. Hey Manny, sorry for the delay here and a thought.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 02:27 PM
Feb 2015

I check in at DU infrequently and randomly so my apologies for not getting back to you sooner.
Here is my thought: (On second thought maybe it is best I post this thought to your inbox.)




pangaia

(24,324 posts)
91. I was 154, or maybe 156, I forget.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 09:02 PM
Feb 2015

I have almost no skills in this field, terrible at advertising. All I can do is play music, and a little more.
But, I will do what I can.
What about a FB page at some point?
I would certainly support it and post on my own timeline...

Oppss. humm, Would DUers then know who I REALLY am?







 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
100. I rec'd by accident, before I saw you were the author. Bytheway there is another push pole
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 10:27 AM
Feb 2015

out there that has HRC running a close "Third" behind ReadyforSomeOneElse and AnyOneButHRC.

Here's a link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1277&pid=3788

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
105. Hey Manny
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 07:01 PM
Feb 2015

Merrily suggested you may want to link some relevant sites on your fabulous new readyforsomeoneelse.org site once its all put together & ready to go~

This one just might be Manny-approved ~

http://dearelizabethwarren.com/home.html

^^^on the new interactive site to Draft Liz:

(new video)













sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
106. That's a good suggestion. There are several Populist groups who are active in trying to get
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:56 PM
Feb 2015

populist candidates elected from the local to the national level also. They had some success also in the mid terms.

We might want to follow the progress of the new Greek Populist Government, the first in Europe to officially reject the Third Way/Neo Liberal/Austerity policies that have devastated the working class across the globe where they have managed to implement them.

They are already under attack from the usual suspects and are going to need a lot of support world wide.

But for now, they have demonstrated that populism can rise above even the most determined and brutal efforts by the Austerity crowd and take back their country.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
110. It wouldn't surprise me at all that the Party Powers told Sen Warren
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:19 AM
Feb 2015

to back off. I wouldn't hold it against her. Sen Sanders said a lot when he said that asking someone progressive to run for president would subject them and their family to untold attacks. The Powers That Be are very powerful and have more money than Dog.

But in spite of their threats, the populist movement will continue.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
108. Ready for Barbara Lee!
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 03:28 PM
Feb 2015

Can't beat somebody with nobody. I'll sign on if Warren steps up, but it seems unlikely. I'm on board with Bernie if he runs, but I fear his history of not being part of the Democratic party will hurt him in the primary.

I say we need a "Draft Barbara Lee" movement. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have drained this country of blood and treasure and there is no end in sight. Let us turn to the one brave woman, the lone prophetic voice in our Congress who stood against these travesties and whose warnings have sadly come true.

I'm Ready for Barbara Lee -- the only member of Congress wise enough to vote NO on the AUMFs of 2001 and 2002.

Demand the BEST for our beloved country! Draft Barbara Lee!

Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
118. Hey Manny, what's the status of this boondoggle? Er, I mean well meaning boondoggle.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 06:36 PM
Feb 2015

Oops, still not right.

What's the status of this fine enterprise?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Ready For Someone Else!™