If you've been alive for almost ninety years, you could gain perspective about activism.
(An interviewer asked Noam Chomsky if humanity had progressed during Chomsky's lifetime)
There have been enormous changes. Just look here at MIT. Take a walk down the hall and take a look at the nature of the student body: its about half women, a third minorities, informally dressed, casual relations among people and so on. When I got here in 1955, if youd walk down the same hall it would have been white males, jackets and ties, very polite, obedient, not posing many questions. Thats a huge change.
And its not just here its all over the place. You and I wouldnt have looked like this, and in fact you probably wouldnt be here. Those are some of the cultural and social changes that have taken place thanks to committed and dedicated activism.
Other things have not, like the labor movement, which has been under severe attack all throughout American history and particularly since the early 1950s. It has been seriously weakened: in the private sector its marginal, and its now being attacked in the public sector. Thats a regression.
The neoliberal policies are certainly a regression. For the majority of the population in the US, theres been pretty much stagnation and decline in the last generation. And not because of any economic laws. These are policies. Just as austerity in Europe is not an economic necessity in fact, its economic nonsense. But its a policy decision undertaken by the designers for their own purposes. I think basically its a kind of class war, and it can be resisted, but its not easy. History doesnt go in a straight line.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/09/noam-chomsky-bernie-sanders-greece-tsipras-grexit-austerity-neoliberalism-protest/
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Merrily, you just don't understand.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He's pushing 90. Cut him some slack.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Even though social security has a dedicated funding mechanism, that is in surplus, it is somehow "running out of money". Yet the military, which has no such dedicated funding mechanism, never runs out of money. And they never have to account for how they spend the money.
merrily
(45,251 posts)industry to the tune of trillions--and that is only one industry.
The 99% has paid a very high price for a "free" market, haven't it? Of course, the 1% chipped in, too, but it got a handsome return on its "investment;" the 99% got scorn.