Movies
Related: About this forumMost graphically disturbing movies?
I watched a film called "Irreversible" last night.
Still can't get the imagery out of my head......horrible..*shudder*
NRaleighLiberal
(60,501 posts)The first 20 minutes of Saving Private Ryan is another that was tough to sit through and watch...though so important to do so.
clarice
(5,504 posts)and yes, both are very disturbing. First 20 minutes of SPR ? I was actually crying.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,501 posts)I watched them because some video review sites said they were among the worst movies ever made. I Spit on Your Grave...and Last House on the Left. Low production values, but exploitative, raw, nasty - and just didn't need to be made. Felt horrible after each of them.
clarice
(5,504 posts)I have an unhealthy taste for gory trash cinema as long as children or animals are not
involved. Seen both of those that you mentioned. Felt like I needed a shower after both.
Have you seen an of the Asian horror films? *yeek!*
cactusfractal
(556 posts)The Omaha Beach sequence in Saving Private Ryan has been described by those who were actually there as the most realistic battle scene ever. I heard an interview with an old corpsman who said it wasn't so much the visuals as the *sounds* of war that were the best replicated. The things that closing one's eyes can't shut out.
I felt like I held my breath the entire time they were storming the beach. I was exhausted from the experience and in more awe of those grunts, as I still am today, who go over the top again... and again... and again.
It sure brought the ugly reality home, didn't it?
Aristus
(68,356 posts)is that that was as bad as it got on D-Day.
The assault on Utah Beach took far fewer casualites, and got inland much quicker. The British came ashore on Gold and Sword Beaches riding bicycles and playing bagpipes. The Canadians at Juno Beach had it tough, but managed to complete all of their assigned objectives by the end of the first day.
Something the film couldn't depict, though, was the fact that the assault on Omaha Beach actually went on for the whole day, and part of the next. That might have been too awful to watch, though. Both SPR and The Longest Day depicted the troops getting the better of the German defenders within a couple of hours.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)The first time I saw "Platoon" I was very very high on LSD, and that messed me up pretty good too.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,501 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)detailing the rise of the machines and the Matrix over humanity. My former roommate is a huge fan of disturbing graphic movies and anime...but these two 9-minute animated shorts, he refuses to re-watch them. They gave him nightmares.
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/n5vpzw/the-second-renaissance-part-i
http://www.gametrailers.com/videos/b77icl/the-second-renaissance-part-ii
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)I think it has the reputation of being the first gore film. I saw it at a drive-in on Halloween and it made me sick for days. It's probably considered tame by today's standards but it did have a lot of blood and the representation of human organs being removed from live victims. I'm not a gore fan although I love horror movies. I prefer horror movies that are atmospheric and where the horror is just suggested. But i don't think any film today could really disturb me, not the way it could when I was a kid.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Susannah Elf
(140 posts)"More grisly than ever in blood color"
Who could resist that?
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)..both for the rape scene and the hooks-on-the-eyelids scenes.
JustAnotherGen
(33,565 posts)Some things can't be unseen.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)sorta grossed out at the time, but whatever "disturbance" I felt when I was watching it didn't carry with me.
I saw "Clockwork Orange" on the big screen when it was first released. Back then, you weren't hip if you hadn't seen it. I can remember cringing at the scenes you mention, but they didn't really affect me to any kind of extent. For me, the whole movie was already high camp and surreal, and there was something about the campiness and surrealism that removed me from having much of an emotional reaction to those scenes.
I think I could probably watch it again, and still experience the same emotional remove I felt the first time.
Susannah Elf
(140 posts)Maybe the clownish make-up and the odd vocabulary gave me enough distance. The scariest movies depict things that might actually happen...
clarice
(5,504 posts)Has anyone seen the movie that I mentioned..."Irreversible"?
mockmonkey
(2,964 posts)Agonizing. I don't know how I managed to watch the whole movie. It's not a movie that you would want to watch a second time.
clarice
(5,504 posts)sweetloukillbot
(12,600 posts)My ex-wife got physically ill at the end. Great movie that I never, ever, want to see again.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)thinking about a couple of scenes, particularly the force-feeding one.
Susannah Elf
(140 posts)the ride in the butcher truck with all the rotten meat
I could almost smell it myself.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)But that spoon scene and the gurgling... ugh. Part of me wants to watch it again to see what a difference 20+ years makes, but I just looked at still photos and think I'll pass!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)There is no overt graphic scene
just the use of dark and light flashes and the sound of Diane Keaton getting stabbed by Richard Gere and death.
Jeez
.
clarice
(5,504 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I was almost going to link it, but I'd have to have a warning
clarice
(5,504 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,672 posts)She was stabbed by Tom Berenger. Richard Gere had a bigger part though.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)It was a long time ago, and I have NEVER since been able to re-watch. Maybe it was the sounds of that "incident"
clarice
(5,504 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)....just disturbing, period....would be "Happiness".
clarice
(5,504 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,672 posts)I walked out during the ear cutting scene. It was just too much for me.
I will say, I take a pass on torture movies, so I haven't seen any of the Saw or Hostel films. Violence is one thing. Torture is something else. I also can't watch any kind of violence against children or animals.
clarice
(5,504 posts)I saw a breakdown of the original Psycho on tv the other day.
I remember when I first saw it, it seemed very bloody. Watching the slow motion
There was hardly any actual gore. Great film making.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,672 posts)alone in the theater when she was PREGNANT. Imagine how shocking it was, and add her hormones to it!
clarice
(5,504 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Susannah Elf
(140 posts)his gore has become almost comical, it's so over the top.I did find Reservoir Dogs disturbing (the overdose scene) but Inglorious Basterds and Django Unchained were just ridiculous. It felt like Quentin had found a really good source for cheap tomato sauce!
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)It's so good. The third one was interesting, and much nicer than the other two. It's also in English.
valerief
(53,235 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)It's intense, and even most of those who can finish it don't know the plot at the end of their first viewing because they're so shocked. The next two, Body Hammer and Bullet Man are much less violent and nihilistic, so people have an easier time with them.
clarice
(5,504 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)I made a fan video using footage from Salo
clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)August Underground, The Beyond, Chinese Torture Chamber Story, New York Ripper, Patrick Still Lives, ... so many good movies.
clarice
(5,504 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)A classic.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Little_Wing
(417 posts)Which I saw when I was PREGNANT urghhh
Secondly, The Piano Teacher. If you saw it, you know what I'm talking about. Double urgghh.
clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Or I'll have nightmares.
I fail to understand why some people like horrifically violent movies.
Maybe it's because I used to work at the courthouse and I've seen
REAL photographs of dead people shot in the head at close range, gotten it in the neck with a sawed-off 20 gauge, strangled and bloated, and such.
My kid made me watch Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill, and I got absolutely NOTHING out of them. Fortunately I remember very little of any of them.
I think you have to be careful about what you watch and listen to. Just like I won't listen to songs about "I ran out of beer, my wife ran off, my pickup got repo'ed, I'm gonna cry over you" etc.
Nor will I listen to music that demeans women by calling them "bitches and hos".
Amerincorporated
(8 posts)This movie was nauseating. Almost unwatchable.
AwakeAtLast
(14,255 posts)Always and will ever be my answer.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)1) Ichi the Killer (Korean).
2) Human Centipede II, Director's Cut
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)My choice is Old Boy. Watching someone get their teeth knocked out just doesn't do much for my appetite.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Not a big fan of the slasher genre, but love good spooky story-telling.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)and now I can't stand them. Not sure why I liked them back then.
LeftInTX
(29,999 posts)I couldn't take it
Stuart G
(38,726 posts)Read the first 10 reviews of this film..Many agree. It is stuck into my mind like a nightmare. As graphically disturbing as is possible.. Yet this film is real..a documentary.....
If you have not seen it, well you have been warned.
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)I have it on Criterion DVD.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Islandurp
(188 posts)Look up the plot on wikipedia if you want, but do yourself a favor and don't watch it.
clarice
(5,504 posts)Zippyjuan
(41 posts)I think the best movies are the ones that are subtle. Hitchcock was obviously a master. Psycho was really the original slasher film but of course not graphic the same way as today. I really did not like Halloween, but it had very little compared to today. The remakes of Texas Chain Saw were supposed to bolt you, but I did not see it. They should've never redone that one.
XxShelbersxX
(1 post)The Poughkeepsie Tapes
clarice
(5,504 posts)Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)Well, first and foremost, I'd say film is art. Art should be used by an artist as a means to express something they feel needs attention. Enjoying art in some cases is something we need to take our mind off the troubles of every day life. Film can depict fantasy or dissect historical topics in a variety of ways. Filmmakers who tend to make films that are disturbing or subversive often have a certain moral message they are trying to get across about certain topics and things in society that are generally so terrifying to us, we choose to simply ignore them as a means of making us feel a sense of security. The most confrontational horror films of the '70s like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Last House on the Left, I Spit on Your Grave, etc. were in some ways a response to the turmoil that was going on in the world at the time. For example, at the time of some films like Night of the Living Dead, TCM, Last House, etc. Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy had been assassinated, their was the Vietnam war, civil rights issues, the Kent State killings, an oil crisis, Watergate, etc. Just a series of crises happening the world over. We learned about how our government was corrupt, the media focused on the horrors and violence of Vietnam, there were massive protests, race riots, etc. Those disturbing and graphic movies at the time were kind of an artistic response to the ongoing angst people were feeling over different issues at the time. In other words, when Wes Craven made Last House on the Left, when John Waters made Pink Flamingos, and when William Friedkin made The Exorcist, they were all sort of "artistic rebellions" against the system. Filmmakers felt the need to be controversial and push boundaries in film. So people who went to see these shocking films kind of wanted something that gave them a release from all their anxieties due to the troubles at the time. To me, it says the world is a fucked up place. Awful shit happens. Sometimes we need dark films as a way of expressing our deepest feelings about certain things. We can watch fictional films and understand they are just acting and special effects and all that, but the style the filmmaker portrays is always the thing that speaks to us most on a personal level. Art is our way of releasing tension that personal problems bring us. Just because I watch graphic and gory movies, it doesn't mean that I am sick and enjoy seeing people getting tortured and killed, I watch them because they are artistic pieces that are simply conveying messages and that is usually the message that although life is hard, in some cases I have to be thankful for what I have as there are people in the world who are left suffering and have no hope at all. Films like Last House on the Left and I Spit on Your Grave aren't films that glorify violence. They are disturbing and shocking (especially in their day), but they are that because that's what violence is like in real life. Rape, torture and killing isn't pretty. I think films that glorify violence are the ones that shy away from it and don't show you how horrific it is. German filmmaker Jorg Buttgereit, the director of the cult classic Nekromantik, said he thinks you glorify violence if you don't show it how it is. A movie like Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer is a film that portrays a serial killer as what a serial killer is in real life. It shows that serial killers shouldn't be idolized like some people try to do with them in real life. It shows they are the scum of the earth. The movies that try to portray villains in a "fun" light are usually the ones that glorify violence. This is the perspective and bigger picture people need to look at when they so quickly judge films like Henry, Last House, and ISOYG as glorifying violence. They simply don't. That's not what they're about. Are they films for everybody? No. Some people simply can't watch that stuff and that's understandable. It's not everyone's cup of tea. By the same token, people shouldn't pass judgment on those who like to watch those movies, just as I wouldn't pass judgment on somebody who choses to watch cleaner, family friendly stuff. Those are my thoughts.
Independent_Liberal
(4,108 posts)I've had it recommended to me by several fellow cinephiles and it looks INTENSE! It's about what people would do in the event of a nuclear apocalypse and from what people have told me, it's pretty fucking grim! It was only released on VHS in the US. It's available on DVD in the UK.
clarice
(5,504 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Martyrs. Not only is it graphically disturbing but it is an excellent movie.
I've seen more disturbing movies like A Serbian Film (mentioned above) and the Guinea Pig series also the August Underground trilogy but they aren't really worth watching. The are just brutal for no real reason but the effects and camera work are beyond unsettling.
If you like horror movies and aren't afraid of some intense sequences, Martyrs is a really good movie in my opinion.
Cheers!