Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 09:34 AM Nov 2013

"Why Obama And Democrats Don’t Do Much of What Liberals Want "

by Ian Welsh

http://www.ianwelsh.net/why-obama-and-democrats-dont-do-much-of-what-liberals-want-netroots-failure-part-2/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IanWelsh+%28Ian+Welsh%29

Politicians do most things because someone wants them done who can hold them accountable if they don’t do it. That includes bad things, and good things. Anyone who doesn’t understand this reality doesn’t understand even the most basic part of politics.

You dances with the ones who brought you, as Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney once said, Obama won by bypassing the Netroots and lying to Progressives and Liberals: he won without us, he owed us nothing once elected.


Political power is constituted of getting people elected, getting people unelected and being able to reward or punish people for doing or not doing what you want. If you can’t do any of those things, you have no power.

This is realpolitik.


This is a good article with some good comments. To be a power the left has to stick together and draw our own red lines, withdrawing support if we get ignored. Pragmatism doesnt work in a war, and make no mistake, we are at war.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Why Obama And Democrats Don’t Do Much of What Liberals Want " (Original Post) rhett o rick Nov 2013 OP
Kick for the sad truth. Scuba Nov 2013 #1
As long as they think we have nowhere else to go Pab Sungenis Nov 2013 #2
if you like the Ian Welsh piece, give this a listen: Virtually Speaking guest Rayne Today nashville_brook Nov 2013 #3
Thanks NB...I'm still reading "Jerome's View" (personal to him) KoKo Nov 2013 #5
i think that we'll have another bite at that apple. nashville_brook Nov 2013 #6
Reading the Comments on Ian's article is like "Trail of Tears" KoKo Nov 2013 #4
 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
2. As long as they think we have nowhere else to go
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 10:32 AM
Nov 2013

this is what they will do.

They still haven't learned the lesson of 2010.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
3. if you like the Ian Welsh piece, give this a listen: Virtually Speaking guest Rayne Today
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 11:45 AM
Nov 2013
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/virtuallyspeaking/2013/11/01/rayne-today-virtually-speaking-with-jay-ackroyd

This is billed as a discussion of security practices, but the second half of the show is all about real. Right around the 30 minute mark starts this part of the discussion and they even discuss Ian Welsh's first part of this essay.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. Thanks NB...I'm still reading "Jerome's View" (personal to him)
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 06:32 PM
Nov 2013

I'll definitely download that.

I think it's long past time we need to EXAMINE...what went Wrong and What We did Correctly in the Netroots Movement.

Thanks for the LINK!

I think that airing the differing viewpoints is a "GOOD THING" about how we who Seized and Owned (We thought) the "NETROOTS" ended up not as savvy as we all thought. (Sorry Martha) but, she did have a way with words.

And, I will go to my Grave...feeling that we (Netroots) laid a Foundation for the Future...even if we Flubbed up on our early efforts.

I refuse to be a "Debbie Downer" as Ian and Jerome are. Both admit they've moved on...but those of us in the "Left Behind Crowd" know we have hard road ahead of us...but we laid the seeds for Edward Snowden and the rest upcoming to SEIZE the MOMENT. I'm perhaps making this too Inclusive...because who the heck knows what inspired Snowden...but, the seeds were planted for CHANGE.. And, we haven't lost those Green Shoots no matter which Political Op..kept looking at the PAST for their PLAYBOOK.

The NETROOTS REVOLUTION was a good thing...even though the early stages...had their hits and disappointments...it was still worth being involved in and I believe, it will morph.

That's why I thought that "Jerome's" Replies were worth a look. We are making History as we Live in it........and what comes will go down long after us. For all it's WARTS and Stop and Starts...there are so many YOUNG who saw this as their Future...and when it got "haulted" they then will take up the Baton, in whatever ways that THEY FIND...to keep going. As I said, I truly believe this...that GOOD will COME FROM OUR EFFORTS..which seems so long ago in the current news cycle.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
6. i think that we'll have another bite at that apple.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:55 PM
Nov 2013

the netroots aren't going away. as a matter of fact they'll be a lot stronger with the table not being run entirely by people beholden to one candidate or another. i actually didn't know that history about Clarke vs Dean and their netroots brain trust. that's the problem right there. netroots should be advocacy and opposition (holding electeds accountable). it can't be straight-up "my candidate and no other" b/c that's no way to build power. it's a sure way to drain power, as was the case.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. Reading the Comments on Ian's article is like "Trail of Tears"
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 05:29 PM
Nov 2013

for the Netroots Movement that so many of us "long time DU'ers" and "Daily Kos" Readers and Members have lived throught since "2000 Selection," and the BIRTH OF THE NETROOTS.

Jerome's somewhat badly written, but emotional History of his Personal Experience...is worth a read. Here's one Snip...and I'm just getting to Obama Campaign.

Serious Political Dem DU'ers who've been around since 2000 will find this interesting in whatever way they were involved. It gives some "inside" scoop as to the background.

SNIP from COMMENTS of "Jerome's" History as he Saw It:

--------


What Happens Next

So, when the insurgent becomes the frontrunner, Dean tries to become the establishment and win it all, starting in Iowa. And then we learned what really came next, and what Trippi didn’t even want to give voice too, perhaps fearing the jinx of materialization, or maybe just not having a clue either, but I think he knew what he feared happening. And here, we are talking about 1) the splitting of the movement; 2) the murder-suicide; 3) the dancer’s music being turned off (you have to see the above comment I made).
Jerome Armstrong permalink
November 4, 2013

Part of the first is the Clark campaign; part of the second was done by people that included the guys that wound up making up the inner core of Obama’s ’08 campaign; and part of the third was done by the corporate-DC media meme.

Clark

Sometimes I wonder if the division is just a feature of the whole thing. The Clark movement is complex. There was a point in time after it was all over, when a scandal formed, by something Zephyr Teachout said about Dean and Trippi having ‘bought out Markos and Jerome’ for their blogging. Zephyr was wrong about that part, but what she was really referring to (and something I fully explained when this came out) was that we’d been talking with Wes Clark about his running for President. The problem was that Markos and I wanted to work together as political consultants. I had ties with Dean, he with Clark, and so we agreed that whomever hired us first is where we’d go. That made the dilemma easy, or so it seemed at the time.

Back then, in 2002, I lived out in Seaside Oregon, in a wooden log-heated cabin on the banks of an estuary, from which I’d kayak out into the pacific ocean during days when I was free from online trading. I was standing outside on the phone one morning, amidst the chickens, listening to Trippi say, “Look, it’s the moment. I don’t want you to be thinking 10 years from now ‘I wish I would have taken the opportunity’ and not have taken it.” I was thinking to myself, ‘this sounds inspiring but it also sounds like something he might say to everyone he want’s to hire but’… I’m in, and tell Markos I’m heading out, moving the family to Vermont. But Markos doesn’t quite want to give up on the Clark dream, so while we go to work for Dean, he keeps maneuvering and eventually sets up a back room meeting for Clark and Dean.

In the meantime, Maslin revs up a focus group to run the possibility of a Dean-Clark ticket. One night, as the campaign is shutting shop, Trippi asks me to stay on in his office and watch the 3 hours of tapes. Alone in HQ’s late into the evening, the future seems to be laid out. The possibility of teaming up an anti-war Doctor that’s Governor, and a 4-star General that’s progressive, just wows the dozen or so democratic primary voters assembled for the group.

Once Dean gets the gist of the focus group results, he decides that he will break convention and, months prior to the voting, ask Clark to be his VP. Markos and I buy DeanClark.com and dream of 16 years. Clark agrees to meet with Dean but won’t decide on the VP role for sure. It goes back and forth but the meeting is on. Trippi told me later that the day of the meeting, Clarks’ guy called and asked that Dean not ask the question. But when Dean is set on something, I am pretty sure it went down with Dean asking, and Clark not committing. Only those two were in the meeting. Dean left the meeting saying it’s not on. Later, Clark would claim Dean asked him. I’m sure he did.

The second part of this involves Hilary and the Clinton’s. In the fall of 2003, Armstrong-Zuniga, as our nascent firm was called, got a call from Patti Solis Doyle, about interviewing for Clinton. I had known of the Clinton’s since going to school in Arkansas in the mid 80′s. And despite one of my close friends being the president of the College Republicans, and having a girlfriend that worked on Clinton’s Little Rock Gubernatorial campaigns, I couldn’t be bothered to even vote. But in 1986, I walked into the election-night hotel room full of campaign supporters the night of the election, as the couple was going on stage, and I didn’t even notice Bill up on the stage, just being taken aback at the radiance around Clinton. I will digress and mention that it’s also the night I stepped out onto a balcony to share a joint, and walked back into the hotel penthouse amidst a small circle of guys that were spittin’ tobacco juice onto the carpet floor, saying crazy-ass militant and reactionary shit: a Tommy Robinson suite and crew. WTF, I thought, if this lunatic is a Democratic rep, we are doomed.

I digressed to talk about the origin of the Tea Party, and now return to Hillary Clinton and the Fall of ’03, when AZ went to DC and met with Patti Solis Doyle. We were ‘chosen’ with two other firms for her new media operation, and it awaited finalization. Only much later did I learn that Clinton wasn’t just making a plan of setting up a team for her ‘standing committee’ or whatever, but instead was putting together a team for jumping into the ’04 presidential campaign. Damn, naivety strikes again. But anyway, when that didn’t happen is when Clark decided to make it a go. And Clark was supplied with plenty of former Clinton-Gore staffers and Arkansas funding to make it a go. Not all, mind you, as there were definitely grassroots operations leading the way. Without that, Clark was nothing. It was just as electric at times for Clark as for Dean. But without a doubt, coming about for whatever reasons, the division of the netroots here had succeeded. It wasn’t nearly as nasty as ‘08, but a feature, not a bug, perhaps.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»"Why Obama And Democ...