Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forum"Did Barack Obama Just Lose to Elizabeth Warren?" (Not really...)
Did Barack Obama Just Lose to Elizabeth Warren?
Not really. On the fast-track trade bill, he was rebuffed by his own party.
By David Corn
| Tue May 12, 2015 Mother Jones
In Washington, as in much of life, it often seems that social evolution doesn't progress much beyond high school. So it was hardly surprising that in the media the battle over the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal was often depicted as a spat between the BMOC of the party (President Barack Obama) and the queen of the alt crowd (Sen. Elizabeth Warren). Yet the vote on Tuesday afternoon in the Senate that blocked fast-track legislationwhich would allow the president to bring the TPP to an up-or-down floor vote with no amendmentswas a sign that Obama's problems are not just with Warren, the Massachusetts populist and progressive darling. Every member of his own party but one voted to stymie a vote on the fast-track bill Obama has been pushing. And after the vote, Sen. Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat who often is mindful of the interests of Manhattan-based financiers, was at the mic denouncing the fast-track measure and demanding a trade deal that does right by American workersa jab at Obama, who has passionately asserted the TPP is good for US workers.
It turns out that Warren was not holding a marginal position, as the White House had contended. The president was....
Despite what Obama officials were saying, there are real policy issues at the heart of this debate. One is transparency...Snip..
...There are plenty of other policy details Warren has cited to support her opposition to the TPP and the fast-track bill. This is rather complicated stuff. Yet the White House tried to cast this as a political fight driven by Warren's desire to remain the favorite of progressive Democrats.
Perhaps the White House fell into a trap and focused too much on Warren. Harry Reid, the Democratic leader in the Senate, was just as adamant in his opposition, declaring that he would block the fast track bill unless it contained provisions aimed at currency manipulation by China. (Labor unions have been demanding that trade deals confront this matter because currency manipulation allows China to export cheap goods and inflate the price of imported goods manufactured by American workers.) But TPP advocates have feared that a currency manipulation provision could sink the whole deal. Democrats, though, rallied behind Reid on this matter.
The outcome of the vote was "shocking," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell observed afterward. And it was. Even pro-trade Democratic senators sided with Reid.
The TPP and fast track are not dead. The White House called the vote merely a "procedural snafu." But Obama and his aides did seem to miscalculate. His strategy of trying to make Warren the odd woman out failedat least in this round....
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/barack-obama-elizabeth-warren-tpp-fast-track
Not really. On the fast-track trade bill, he was rebuffed by his own party.
By David Corn
| Tue May 12, 2015 Mother Jones
In Washington, as in much of life, it often seems that social evolution doesn't progress much beyond high school. So it was hardly surprising that in the media the battle over the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal was often depicted as a spat between the BMOC of the party (President Barack Obama) and the queen of the alt crowd (Sen. Elizabeth Warren). Yet the vote on Tuesday afternoon in the Senate that blocked fast-track legislationwhich would allow the president to bring the TPP to an up-or-down floor vote with no amendmentswas a sign that Obama's problems are not just with Warren, the Massachusetts populist and progressive darling. Every member of his own party but one voted to stymie a vote on the fast-track bill Obama has been pushing. And after the vote, Sen. Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat who often is mindful of the interests of Manhattan-based financiers, was at the mic denouncing the fast-track measure and demanding a trade deal that does right by American workersa jab at Obama, who has passionately asserted the TPP is good for US workers.
It turns out that Warren was not holding a marginal position, as the White House had contended. The president was....
Despite what Obama officials were saying, there are real policy issues at the heart of this debate. One is transparency...Snip..
...There are plenty of other policy details Warren has cited to support her opposition to the TPP and the fast-track bill. This is rather complicated stuff. Yet the White House tried to cast this as a political fight driven by Warren's desire to remain the favorite of progressive Democrats.
Perhaps the White House fell into a trap and focused too much on Warren. Harry Reid, the Democratic leader in the Senate, was just as adamant in his opposition, declaring that he would block the fast track bill unless it contained provisions aimed at currency manipulation by China. (Labor unions have been demanding that trade deals confront this matter because currency manipulation allows China to export cheap goods and inflate the price of imported goods manufactured by American workers.) But TPP advocates have feared that a currency manipulation provision could sink the whole deal. Democrats, though, rallied behind Reid on this matter.
The outcome of the vote was "shocking," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell observed afterward. And it was. Even pro-trade Democratic senators sided with Reid.
The TPP and fast track are not dead. The White House called the vote merely a "procedural snafu." But Obama and his aides did seem to miscalculate. His strategy of trying to make Warren the odd woman out failedat least in this round....
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/barack-obama-elizabeth-warren-tpp-fast-track
(also posted in GD)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1616 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Did Barack Obama Just Lose to Elizabeth Warren?" (Not really...) (Original Post)
RiverLover
May 2015
OP
Demeter
(85,373 posts)1. Obama Never "Had" Elizabeth Warren
and he lost most of the rest of that crowd that graduated into adulthood long ago. She's just too politically polite to call him out.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)2. Yep. Way to classy to stoop to that level.
I'm so glad a light is being shone on his sad & failed attempt to make this about her.