Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri murder rate increases 16% after Permit to Buy (Original Post) flamin lib Mar 2014 OP
Red states with lax gun laws = more gun violence billh58 Mar 2014 #1
I see one of the Gungeon gun fanciers is claiming his research trumps Johns Hoyt Mar 2014 #2
Why don't you ask him? Jgarrick Mar 2014 #3
Can't. They banned me from posting in their merry little group. Hoyt Mar 2014 #4
Good thing that isn't done here, eh? Jgarrick Mar 2014 #5
Yeah, most people who strap a gun on before venturing out into public are, or Hoyt Mar 2014 #6
You may have a point there...guys like this: Jgarrick Mar 2014 #7
Are you enjoying billh58 Mar 2014 #8
You seem to think I have a secret identity...so tell me: Jgarrick Mar 2014 #12
No, your identity is no billh58 Mar 2014 #13
Wow...*many* people know my identity! Jgarrick Mar 2014 #15
Nor do gun fanciers with their militia buddies and confederate flags. Hoyt Mar 2014 #11
Given that I've never knowingly met a militia member or someone sporting a Confederate flag, Jgarrick Mar 2014 #14
If you are a gun fancier, I find that very hard to believe. Guess you are not familiar Hoyt Mar 2014 #16
Never met the man. Jgarrick Mar 2014 #17
You are just dodging. I'd suggest you'll be more comfortable with Gungeoneers talking Hoyt Mar 2014 #18
While I do like the Gungeon, I'm quite comfortable here as well. Jgarrick Mar 2014 #23
I have a question for you Bubba: billh58 Mar 2014 #19
You do? Good for you! But you haven't answered *my* questions yet, have you? Jgarrick Mar 2014 #22
Nice try Bubba. billh58 Mar 2014 #24
I apologize for not being billh58 Mar 2014 #35
Me neither, come to think of it. Deep13 Mar 2014 #29
You think that you're being clever, billh58 Mar 2014 #9
Yep, they have a few billh58 Mar 2014 #10
As usual with Second Amendment absolutists billh58 Mar 2014 #20
Now, I see the Gungeoneers are proclaiming their support for Zimmerman in their attempt to defend Hoyt Mar 2014 #21
There are a few Second Amendment absolutists and NRA apologists billh58 Mar 2014 #25
since laws and ideas are made of words... Deep13 Mar 2014 #27
Not really. Magazine or clip, doesn't matter because they both hold and feed ammo. Hoyt Mar 2014 #32
NEVERMIND Deep13 Mar 2014 #26
I am not willing to let people die for my hobby. Deep13 Mar 2014 #28
Thank you for your billh58 Mar 2014 #31
They don't care who buys them. Deep13 Mar 2014 #33
I need a gun to... deathrind Mar 2014 #30
For clarification; billh58 Mar 2014 #34
K&R! n/t billh58 Apr 2014 #36

billh58

(6,641 posts)
1. Red states with lax gun laws = more gun violence
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 01:17 PM
Mar 2014

Typical right-wing NRA puppet talking point:

State Sen. Brian Munzlinger, R-Williamstown, sponsored the amendment to the bill that repealed the background check. He said last week he hadn't heard of the study and couldn't comment much on it, but he said it "doesn't sound very factual" and added a permit-to-purchase law wouldn't be much of a deterrent.

"Criminals know how to evade the law anyway," he said.

From the link in the OP


Yes, criminals do know how to evade the law, but now they don't even need to "evade the law" because it has been repealed. Right-wing logic boggles the mind, and the NRA/ALEC/Koch Brothers gun lobby makes tons of money based on that fact. A few bucks here, and a few bucks there, and Presto! -- more guns = more murder and gun violence, which equates to more profits for the death merchants.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I see one of the Gungeon gun fanciers is claiming his research trumps Johns
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 04:25 PM
Mar 2014

Hopkins' researchers. LMAO. You think Teddy Nugent, and similar gun lovers/promoters, helped him reach his conclusions?

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
3. Why don't you ask him?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 04:37 PM
Mar 2014
You think Teddy Nugent, and similar gun lovers/promoters, helped him reach his conclusions?

Did Leland Yee help you reach yours?
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Can't. They banned me from posting in their merry little group.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 04:53 PM
Mar 2014

Proud to say. However, you appear to be friendly with the the gun fondlers.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
5. Good thing that isn't done here, eh?
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 05:01 PM
Mar 2014
However, you appear to be friendly with the the gun fondlers.

I'm a friendly sort of guy.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Yeah, most people who strap a gun on before venturing out into public are, or
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 05:18 PM
Mar 2014

so they tell us.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
8. Are you enjoying
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 05:35 PM
Mar 2014

your resurrection? You do seem to have learned how to dance around the SOP of this Group in this incarnation however, so enjoy your stay Bubba.

Edit: In regards to your snarky picture post above, those guys are paid to "strap on a gun," and are not wannabe vigilantes.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
12. You seem to think I have a secret identity...so tell me:
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:04 PM
Mar 2014


In regards to your snarky picture post above, those guys are paid to "strap on a gun,"

So are these guys:



Friends of yours, I take it?
 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
15. Wow...*many* people know my identity!
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:28 PM
Mar 2014

So what is it? How does that phrase go? Put up or....something or other.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
14. Given that I've never knowingly met a militia member or someone sporting a Confederate flag,
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:23 PM
Mar 2014

I am forced to defer to your experience in interactions with such people.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. If you are a gun fancier, I find that very hard to believe. Guess you are not familiar
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 06:55 PM
Mar 2014

with NRA board members like Teddy Nugent.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
18. You are just dodging. I'd suggest you'll be more comfortable with Gungeoneers talking
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:06 PM
Mar 2014

about your weapons of choice for various highly unlikely encounters with scary people, appreciation for stand your ground laws, and the like.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
23. While I do like the Gungeon, I'm quite comfortable here as well.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 12:39 AM
Mar 2014

I try to get along with everyone.

I don't always succeed, but I do try.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
19. I have a question for you Bubba:
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 07:17 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Sun Mar 30, 2014, 08:31 PM - Edit history (1)

How do any of your posts to this Group contribute to "discussing how to enact progressive gun control reform?" That is a quote from the SOP for this Group, and nothing that I've seen from your postings in this Group so far are anything but derisive of gun control, and attempts at disruption.

If you have nothing to post about how to enact progressive gun control reform, I suggest that you contain your snarky posts to the RKBA Group where you may post anti-gun control screeds to your heart's content.

 

Jgarrick

(521 posts)
22. You do? Good for you! But you haven't answered *my* questions yet, have you?
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 12:35 AM
Mar 2014

If you simply ignore my questions and keep throwing out your own, that's not a conversation, is it?

Here they are again:

You seem to think I have a secret identity...so tell me: Who am I?

Also: Given that you have justified people being armed when they are paid to "strap on a gun" (your words, not mine), do you in fact defend the arming of Blackwater mercenaries? If not, how is that consistent with your previous statement?

Now, if you can find it in yourself to answer these questions in a polite, restrained manner, we can continue to converse. If, on the other hand, you simply want to make snarky insults ("Bubba"? Really?), then I'm afraid you're in contravention of the SOP of this group, and should contain your posts to other forums, and not continue to disrupt this one.

Deep13

(39,156 posts)
29. Me neither, come to think of it.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:58 AM
Mar 2014

I am aware that such folks exist, but I do not know for sure if I have ever met one, apart from Civil War reenactors.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
10. Yep, they have a few
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 05:44 PM
Mar 2014

legal "experts" over there who lecture on the meaning of court rulings on all gun matters -- especially how rulings unfavorable to the NRA are not really what they appear, and are actually a boost for the right-wing gun lobby.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
20. As usual with Second Amendment absolutists
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:11 PM
Mar 2014

they are attempting to skew the discussion with cherry-picked half-truths. They are referring to a decline in the overall homicide rate, whereas the referenced report specifically refers to an increase in "gun homicides."

While overall violent crime is decreasing nationwide (a debunked NRA talking point: "more guns = less crime&quot , gun violence rates (including gun homicides and suicides) remain steady, and are slightly increasing in areas where sane gun laws have been relaxed by the corrupt influence of right-wing gun lobby.

Gun deaths are on track to exceed automobile deaths by next year, but the NRA/ALEC/Koch Brothers right-wing gun lobby ignores that fact, and lobbies against any scientific research into the gun violence epidemic in this country.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
21. Now, I see the Gungeoneers are proclaiming their support for Zimmerman in their attempt to defend
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 10:45 PM
Mar 2014

their gun love and credentials compared to Johns Hopkins researchers. Next, they'll be telling us JH's researchers don't know gun nomenclature, as if that makes any difference.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
25. There are a few Second Amendment absolutists and NRA apologists
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:36 AM
Mar 2014

who have defended and supported Zimmerman since before the sham trial. Their motto: "If you're a gunner, you're good to go."

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
32. Not really. Magazine or clip, doesn't matter because they both hold and feed ammo.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:38 AM
Mar 2014

As far as defining "assault weapon," just restrict all semi-autos to one per gun fancier. I mean dang, the gun fanciers and manufacturers are the one who try to live with the spirit of the law. They gotta have a bunch of menacing weapons to fondle. Don't you find that a bit sick?

BTW, I see from your posts below that you have a refreshing attitude toward gunz not often exhibited by most in the gun culture who espouse Molon Labe, or some such BS.

I mean dang, these guys clearly aren't well meaning gun owners --





Deep13

(39,156 posts)
28. I am not willing to let people die for my hobby.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 10:55 AM
Mar 2014

I really enjoy shooting. I shoot paper targets at controlled ranges and it is a lot of fun. I hope I never have to give it up, but if there are some guns or accessories I can no longer own because of the public danger private ownership creates, well then that's how it has to be. No one should have to go to school worrying if some asshole is going to show up and murder a bunch of folks. So I support gun control hoping to end the violence. Hopefully, if banning the most destructive weapons eliminates the violence, then there will be no need to go after sporting guns. If I can only load ten rounds at a time, well it's not like paper targets put up much of a fight.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
31. Thank you for your
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:18 AM
Mar 2014

Thank you for your civility, and for your understanding of the need for sensible gun control legislation in the interest of public safety. None of the Groups listed in the pinned post at the top of this thread are advocating "confiscation" of legal weapons. There are mixed messages and feelings about so-called 'assault weapons," and the arguments on both sides have merit.

The right-wing gun lobby fronted by the NRA has only one goal: to sell more guns. To do that their marketing model is the elimination of any and all sane gun laws nationwide.

Deep13

(39,156 posts)
33. They don't care who buys them.
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 12:19 PM
Mar 2014

If gun makers can sell to Mexican drug lords at gun shows, they will do it and in fact they are doing it.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
30. I need a gun to...
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 11:15 AM
Mar 2014

Protect myself from a gun. The circular logic of that argument shows the depth of cognitive dissonance employed on this subject.

billh58

(6,641 posts)
34. For clarification;
Mon Mar 31, 2014, 12:35 PM
Mar 2014

From an earlier article from Raw Story:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/17/study-missouri-murders-spike-after-state-repeals-gun-background-check-law/

“Coincident exactly with the policy change, there was an immediate upward trajectory to the homicide rates in Missouri,” Webster told BBC. “That upward trajectory did not happen with homicides that did not involve guns; it did not occur to any neighbouring state; the national trend was doing the opposite – it was trending downward; and it was not specific to one or two localities – it was, for the most part, state-wide.”


Second Amendment absolutists are quick to point out that the overall homicide rate in Missouri (and the nation) declined, but ignore the fact that the homicide rate involving guns did, in fact, increase in Missouri. Statistics indicate that gun violence and gun homicide rates remain fairly steady, or are on the increase in some areas where gun laws have been relaxed.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Missouri murder rate incr...