Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
If You Don't Think Newtown Changed America's Gun Debate, Consider These Facts
A year after the horrific shooting in Newtown last December, one can be forgiven for thinking nothings changed in Americas gun debate. We still havent seen any major new federal laws passed, and President Obamas push for expanded background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines went nowhere. Democrats in Congress still talk about revising the Obama proposals but most have given up hope of anything passing soon. Gun advocates remain committed to stopping Congress from passing any new laws, so much so that they even killed a proposal this week to expand the ban on undetectable guns to apply to all-plastic, 3D printed guns.
Nonetheless, the gun debate has changed in significant ways since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. The gun control movement is reinvigorated after being moribund for nearly two decades. Today, thanks largely to Michael Bloomberg, theres real money flowing into campaigns to support candidates favoring more restrictive gun laws. And, while legislation is stalled in Congress, a host of new laws have been passed at the state level. Of course, the gun advocates remain a powerful political force. Yet for the first time in years they have serious competition in the political marketplace. The gun debate is now more evenly matched than it has been in a long time.
After Republicans took the House in 1994, Democrats in Washington decided to steer clear of the gun control issue. They blamed the Republican victory on President Clintons support of two major gun control laws, the Brady Background Check law and the now-expired ban on certain military-style (or assault) weapons. Fearing that gun control was politically toxic, Democrats practically made it a plank in the partys platform to Avoid Gun Control At All Costs. If nothing else, Newtown radically changed the Democrats political calculations. President Obama had barely mentioned gun control during his first term, even earning an F (!) rating from the Brady Center, one of the nations leading gun control advocacy groups. After Newtown, however, Obama moved gun control to the very top of his second-term agenda. While his push failed, it established gun control as an issue of national priority.
Weve also seen a wave of new money flowing into elections to support pro-control candidates. For the past 30 years or so, nearly all the money that went into campaigns went to anti-control candidates. The NRA and gun enthusiasts spent millions to elect candidates opposed to new gun control laws. By contrast, the Brady Center and other gun control groups were struggling just to stay afloat and couldnt afford to be active contributors. Since Newtown, more political money than ever has gone to the side seeking new restrictions. Led by New Yorks outgoing mayor, Michael Bloomberg and his Independence USA political action committee, gun control advocates have spent considerable funds on races from Virginia to Illinois to Colorado. In the Virginia gubernatorial race, Bloombergs PAC outspent the NRA by a wide marginand helped secure a victory for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in the NRAs own home state.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115905/newtown-shooting-anniversary-how-tragedy-changed-gun-debate
Nonetheless, the gun debate has changed in significant ways since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. The gun control movement is reinvigorated after being moribund for nearly two decades. Today, thanks largely to Michael Bloomberg, theres real money flowing into campaigns to support candidates favoring more restrictive gun laws. And, while legislation is stalled in Congress, a host of new laws have been passed at the state level. Of course, the gun advocates remain a powerful political force. Yet for the first time in years they have serious competition in the political marketplace. The gun debate is now more evenly matched than it has been in a long time.
After Republicans took the House in 1994, Democrats in Washington decided to steer clear of the gun control issue. They blamed the Republican victory on President Clintons support of two major gun control laws, the Brady Background Check law and the now-expired ban on certain military-style (or assault) weapons. Fearing that gun control was politically toxic, Democrats practically made it a plank in the partys platform to Avoid Gun Control At All Costs. If nothing else, Newtown radically changed the Democrats political calculations. President Obama had barely mentioned gun control during his first term, even earning an F (!) rating from the Brady Center, one of the nations leading gun control advocacy groups. After Newtown, however, Obama moved gun control to the very top of his second-term agenda. While his push failed, it established gun control as an issue of national priority.
Weve also seen a wave of new money flowing into elections to support pro-control candidates. For the past 30 years or so, nearly all the money that went into campaigns went to anti-control candidates. The NRA and gun enthusiasts spent millions to elect candidates opposed to new gun control laws. By contrast, the Brady Center and other gun control groups were struggling just to stay afloat and couldnt afford to be active contributors. Since Newtown, more political money than ever has gone to the side seeking new restrictions. Led by New Yorks outgoing mayor, Michael Bloomberg and his Independence USA political action committee, gun control advocates have spent considerable funds on races from Virginia to Illinois to Colorado. In the Virginia gubernatorial race, Bloombergs PAC outspent the NRA by a wide marginand helped secure a victory for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in the NRAs own home state.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115905/newtown-shooting-anniversary-how-tragedy-changed-gun-debate
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1628 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If You Don't Think Newtown Changed America's Gun Debate, Consider These Facts (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Dec 2013
OP
seattledo
(295 posts)1. But when they're not smart enough not to shoot themselves:
http://dallas.culturemap.com/news/life/12-16-13-frisco-gun-club-employee-accidentally-shoots-himself-grand-opening-weekend/
the idea of using logic to win will fail. Bloomberg's heart is in the right place, but his methods just aren't as effective as they could be.
the idea of using logic to win will fail. Bloomberg's heart is in the right place, but his methods just aren't as effective as they could be.
billh58
(6,641 posts)2. The tide is
definitely turning in favor of tighter gun control legislation, and will continue to do so. It took the NRA, ALEC, and the Koch Brothers several generations to buy enough corrupt politicians to pass their obscene "guns for everyone, anywhere" laws, and it will take a while to overturn that political mindset. The fact is, that the mean old Democrats are NOT coming to take anyone's guns away, and that Big Lie is being put to rest.
Thankfully, the number of cold-dead-hands Second Amendment fanatics (militias, skinheads, survivalists, Libertarians) are on the decline, and are becoming politically inconsequential.