What was the result of the CDC study on guns that Pres. Obama commissioned?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022204819Have there been any findings yet?
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)Here's the press release from June 5, 2013, from the National Academy of Sciences, et al (emphasis mine):
WASHINGTON -- A new report from the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council proposes priorities for a research agenda to improve understanding of the public health aspects of gun-related violence, including its causes, health burden, and possible interventions. The committee that wrote the report said significant progress can be achieved in three to five years through a research program that addresses five high-priority areas: the characteristics of gun violence, risk and protective factors, prevention and other interventions, gun safety technology, and the influence of video games and other media.
The report stems from executive orders issued by President Obama in January 2013 directing federal agencies to improve knowledge of the causes of firearm violence, interventions that might prevent it, and strategies to minimize its public health burden. One of these executive orders charged the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with identifying the most pressing firearm-related violence research needs. In turn, CDC and the CDC Foundation asked IOM and the Research Council to recommend a research agenda on the public health aspects of firearm-related violence. The committee determined potential research topics by surveying previous relevant research, receiving public input, and using expert judgment. It was not asked to consider the amount and sources of funding required to carry out the research agenda and did not specify the methodologies that should be used to address the topics.
"The complexity and frequency of gun-related violence combined with its impact on the health and safety of the nation's residents make it a topic of considerable public health importance," said Alan Leshner, chair of the study committee and CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "Therefore, when developing its agenda, the committee took a public health approach that focused on gun violence problems associated with significant levels of injuries and fatalities. Although this research agenda is an initial, not all-encompassing set of questions, it could help better define the causes and prevention of firearm violence in order to develop effective policies to reduce its occurrence and impact in the U.S. Similar approaches to public health problems have produced successes in lowering tobacco use, accidental poisoning, and motor vehicle fatalities."
Doesn't that give you great confidence of imminent progress on the problem???
You can download a copy of the report here (~900KB, pdf, 124 pages) or pre-order a paperback. You have to create an account (email, password) to download.
Enjoy!
CTyankee
(65,070 posts)Congress, it couldn't be made. We have to keep up the pressure on the administration to see to it that this order is carried out.
Cindysmythe2013
(1 post)I read it the report and the 10page summary just now and it doesnt neccessarily support the right wing on this issue..the ONLY reason gun advocates like it is because it does support SOME stances of guns providing protection..I agree..guns can help protect..no debate on that...but the report goes on to talk about "fatal and non fatal firearms pose a serious threat to American safety and welfare" and goes on about.."although gun violence has decreased, US related firearms deaths remains the highest in the world"..the report goes on to site more research is needed...but the report is in NO WAY a firm support of gun advocates...if you read the report it simply supports "some" measure of gun use is helpful for protection but it hardly takes a hardcore approach against Obama's executive orders...right now..you just got TONS of gun website sites going..'woo hoo!!"..we won when the report really isnt that stellar cause it rips hard at the gun violence rate in the US being worse than anywhere on the planet. Gun advocates like it because it totally doesnt rip ownership as most thought it would. It doesnt touch the issue of problems law enforcement has to track illegal gun sales. Trust me, gun extremists dont have much to celebrate here..I love my guns but I also love to make sure others who shouldnt own them..dont have the ability to get them. Heck..Illinois just passed a law that REQUIRES people to report in 72hrs if there gun goes missing. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-quinn-signs-gun-bill-20130818,0,6251315.story