Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
I have it on good authority that the VAWA is nothing but gun control.
Under Cover of Darkness U.S. Senate Passes New Gun Control Lawshttps://www.ammoland.com/2022/03/under-cover-of-darkness-senate-passes-new-gun-control-laws/#axzz7NhkkXQyeOMG!! We are going to take all the guns away!!1!1 Well, us and the 'turncoat Republicans'.
The gunners are up in arms over the VAWA. Even though the Boyfriend Loophole was restored allowing an unmarried domestic partner to beat and abuse 'his woman' and still keep his guns the gun nutz are convinced that the camel's nose is under the tent. Why? First there's the provision that requires all failed background checks to be reported to local authorities for investigation. OH NOES! That will make someone who broke the law into a criminal. Or something like that. Next the law provides for research grants to study gun violence so we (and the turncoats) can find an excuse to TAKE THE GUNS AWAY! And then, AND THEN there's a provision that will allow the ATF to work directly with local law enforcement thus TURNING ALL LOCAL COPS INTO GUN GRABBING GESTAPO.
This is the level of paranoia and propaganda being stirred by the gun culture to benefit the Gun Vultures.
How is there supposed to be a 'compromise' with the likes of this???
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 5062 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have it on good authority that the VAWA is nothing but gun control. (Original Post)
AndyS
Mar 2022
OP
Srkdqltr
(7,656 posts)1. VAWA?? What is that?
AndyS
(14,559 posts)2. Violence Against Women Act nt
Pobeka
(4,999 posts)3. violence against women act
Freddie
(9,691 posts)4. Violence Against Women Act
Srkdqltr
(7,656 posts)8. Thank you all for the answer
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)5. The firearm and ammo business in the US is around 15 billion dollars a year.
Any more questions?
Freddie
(9,691 posts)6. I see my "moderate and independent" Congressman
Brian Fitzpatrick was not one of the turncoat Republicans who voted yes. Gotta keep that gun nut cred while being reasonable.
All the wife beaters are going to go insane as well as all the gun nuts that have their own private arsenals including rocket launchers and other necessary items to protect oneself. The right wing websites will be out of control today. Good for them, it builds character.
retiredgeek
(34 posts)9. Good entertainment
Check out the nutballs at Freerepublic over this...😁 They are convinced its satan or some such nonsense is behind this. Between this and the anti-Vaxers over there they are are sure the end is near😎. And these people vote....scary.
multigraincracker
(34,068 posts)10. What part of "Well regulated"
don't they get?
CTyankee
(65,012 posts)11. IIRC, they like their own definition of "well regulated" which does not include having the government do the regulating.
IIRC, their iidea of "well regulated' means something like well managed.