Erdoğan has managed the unthinkable: uniting all the other Middle East rivals
Turkeys Syria invasion following US withdrawal of its troops means that all bets are now off in the Middle East
Simon Tisdall
Sat 12 Oct 2019 13.05 BST
Last modified on Sun 13 Oct 2019 02.06 BST
By invading northern Syria last week, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan achieved what many thought impossible uniting all the regional countries and rival powers with a stake in the country in furious opposition to what they see as a reckless, destabilising move.
A truculent nationalist-populist with dictatorial tendencies, Erdoğan has often cast himself as one man against the world during 16 consecutive years as Turkeys prime minister and president. Now he really is on his own.
Fighting along the border is limited, so far, but that could quickly change. Should hostilities intensify, a broader Turkish advance into densely populated areas could entail significant civilian casualties, displace many inhabitants and fuel local insurgency, the International Crisis Group warned.
Even as the EU, the US, Russia, Iran and the Arab states voice their differing objections to the invasion (Turkey terms it a peace operation), each is simultaneously trying to adjust to it, looking for advantage or leverage as the balance of power in Syria shifts again.
-snip-
It was a disastrous decision the US is belatedly scrambling to correct. Betraying the Kurds, comrades-in-arms in the fight against Isis, was bad enough. Appearing to abandon Syria to Russia and Iran, Americas rivals and the main backers of Bashar al-Assads criminal Damascus regime, was a big strategic own goal, capping eight years of post-Arab spring US policy failures.
-snip-