Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"You Focus On The Good": Women Who Voted For drumpf In Their Own Words (Original Post) Bigredhunk Jan 2017 OP
I think they are all full of shit. madaboutharry Jan 2017 #1
Stone cold racists and misinformed idiots. yardwork Jan 2017 #2
Holy Shit...they really are deplorable! /NT sdfernando Jan 2017 #3
NY Times page said I have reached my 10 article limit so I skylucy Jan 2017 #4
- Bigredhunk Jan 2017 #5
Thank you. I will do that! skylucy Jan 2017 #6
Yeah, they made excuses for his vulgarity, Ilsa Jan 2017 #10
And the next line is a classic: Garrett78 Jan 2017 #13
STUPID BURNS! Cha Jan 2017 #25
What "good"? There is no fucking "good" in that disgusting putz. n/t BlueStater Jan 2017 #7
Some of them mentioned that they disliked Hillary. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #8
The fake email scandal was uniquely damaging in 2016. And George W. Bush was uniquely damaging StevieM Jan 2017 #18
Didn't read it, but marybourg Jan 2017 #9
And he's not going to suddenly change at age 70 because he became pres. nt Ilsa Jan 2017 #11
If anything he's become marybourg Jan 2017 #12
I work with at least four fools who speak just like the women in the article. Tatiana Jan 2017 #14
I know some. They're just bass ackwards because they are mired in an idiotic culture JCanete Jan 2017 #15
I saw a link to this while reading another NYTimes article Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #16
Self-deluded fools. Starry Messenger Jan 2017 #17
I hope that the complete stupidity is a result of the selection by the NYT! karynnj Jan 2017 #19
they voted for trump JI7 Jan 2017 #21
Wow, they sound like domestic abuse victims. synergie Jan 2017 #20
Nauseating ... I couldn't make it passed a few paragraphs Raine Jan 2017 #22
fucking assholes JI7 Jan 2017 #23
dump focuses on LIES and SHITE.. if they think that's "good" then Cha Jan 2017 #24
I do not have any empathy for them at all. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada. DetlefK Jan 2017 #26
Shit. I had a suspicion people were that stupid. Article confirms yet. Damn. kairos12 Jan 2017 #27

skylucy

(3,862 posts)
4. NY Times page said I have reached my 10 article limit so I
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 10:25 PM
Jan 2017

was blocked from seeing the article. Maybe that is a blessing.

Bigredhunk

(1,477 posts)
5. -
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 10:42 PM
Jan 2017

Lol. Probably is, since this article is infuriating. But the 10 article limit is easy to work around. Just go into your browser's settings and delete the cookies for NYT. You get to start over at 0.

Ilsa

(62,251 posts)
10. Yeah, they made excuses for his vulgarity,
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 11:01 PM
Jan 2017

Claimed Hillary was worse. It was unbelievable that these women got suckered in to believing his BS.

I was really offended by the one who said, "He's just saying what everyone is thinking but afraid to say." Uh, no. We aren't thinking anything like that.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
13. And the next line is a classic:
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 12:16 AM
Jan 2017

"He says what everyone’s thinking and is afraid to say. That doesn’t make anyone bigoted."

So, in other words, being bigoted doesn't make one a bigot if there are many other bigots.

That woman's assumption that "everyone" is thinking horribly racist and misogynistic things is quite telling. I guess the only positive to take from that is that some are willing to admit Trump spews hatred, something certain progressives aren't even willing to acknowledge.

Like you, I'm not thinking anything like the shit that comes spewing out of Trump.

Buckeye_Democrat

(15,052 posts)
8. Some of them mentioned that they disliked Hillary.
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 10:55 PM
Jan 2017

That might be a big part of it. That's why I was glad she wasn't nominated in '08 because I heard lots of Hillary-hate back then too.

Even if they've been conditioned that way, how could they trust Trump more than her?!

StevieM

(10,541 posts)
18. The fake email scandal was uniquely damaging in 2016. And George W. Bush was uniquely damaging
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 03:08 AM
Jan 2017

in 2008.

We would have won that election, especially after the economy collapsed.

Besides, the stuff I was hearing about Barack Obama in 2008 was pretty frightening, even before the nonsense about his birth certificate hit high gear.

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
14. I work with at least four fools who speak just like the women in the article.
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 01:06 AM
Jan 2017

I just... I don't know where to begin.

The only thing I can say is that we've got to come up with a cure for stupid.

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
15. I know some. They're just bass ackwards because they are mired in an idiotic culture
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 02:06 AM
Jan 2017

and certain behaviors by men have been very normalized to them, and this means people they love talk this way(not full on but in that realm), like their father's, uncles and brothers...and the women in their lives accept their role. They should not be shamed for this...I don't see how that kind of thing would help. We should continue to pick at whether or not that sort of behavior has to be normal. We should continue to show them their value so that they don't let it be defined by their unfortunate role models. There's no reason to shit on people who themselves are victims to some extent of institutional sexism.

We can certainly do our own hating on people and I can understand the inclination. We can't change people's minds that way, and worse, it only obscures the root cause when we blanketly assume stupidity or malice. Ignorance is a huge component of lack of empathy. Finding fault in people isn't appreciative of the mechanisms that reinforce that ignorance. It just ensures that when the people on top seek to divide us, we support them in their efforts.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,035 posts)
16. I saw a link to this while reading another NYTimes article
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 02:14 AM
Jan 2017

and couldn't bring myself to click on it.

I thought, "If only you idiots would've done that focusing on the good thing with President Obama, the country would be a whole helluva lot better off right now and I might not think you were a coven of total fucking racist hypocrites.

karynnj

(59,969 posts)
19. I hope that the complete stupidity is a result of the selection by the NYT!
Sun Jan 15, 2017, 04:36 PM
Jan 2017

It makes me hope that a REAL analysis tries to examine the reasons so many people voted against their STATED interests. The one thing it does bring into question is almost everything postulated here as the reason. There is little talk of economic concerns, anger over identity politics, anger over Wall Street AND an incorrect assigning HRC with being closer.

Many spoke of Trump knowing how to "build things" and these comments were assigned to engineers! and daughters of engineers. You have one saying he is like her EX husband -- and saying that deep down he is a good man! Another - trying to say that HRC changed her position drastically -- says she went 360! - apparently having failed to learn anything in high school geometry - as moving 360 degrees would place you where you started! Another was impressed by Ivanka!

Were these women picked for their stupidity? Did they actually ok their names and photos appearing with these comments?

DetlefK

(16,471 posts)
26. I do not have any empathy for them at all. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.
Mon Jan 16, 2017, 07:07 AM
Jan 2017

"This guy has such potential."
HE'S 70 F**KING YEARS OLD!!! And she really thinks that this guy will eventually change? That's he's a bad person but will become a good person any day now? Really???



"I don’t agree with a lot of what he said, but I felt he was honest."
Buckle up, because you're in for a ride.



"From what I’m understanding, he’s only really wanting illegal immigrants that have committed crimes to be deported, which I agree with. I feel bad for the lesbian and gay and transsexual community that fear for their way of life. From what I understand, he says he’s not going to mess with that.
Somebody called me a racist because I did vote for Trump. Hold on, you don’t know me. Doesn’t that make you a racist by calling me a racist when you don’t know me?"
1. He said he wants to deport all 13 million of them. How have you never heard that?
2. Oh yeah. Donald Trump and the Republicans. They would never mess with the rights of LGBT-people.
3. That's not what "racist" means. "Racist" is a specific term for people who say specific things about race. "Racist" is not a catch-all description for all the people who disagree with you, you dumb fuck.



"He speaks his mind and because of that, he’s not going to lie to you. I don’t want immigrants, accepting them without doing the background checks. Are these people terrorists? I don’t want to live in a country where we have to worry about going to the movie theater or the mall."
1. He's not going to lie. HAHAHAHAHA!
2. The US already is doing background-checks on immigrants.
3. How many hours has it been since the last mass-shooting in a theater or mall??????????????



"Obama was out for himself. I don’t think he really respected the office. I think it was more about him being a celebrity than a president."
As opposed to Trump, who has no reputation of being a publicity-obsessed reality-TV-star and who will treat the office of the President with decency and respect.



--------------------

Seriously. Once Trump lets them down and disappoints them and makes their lives worse, given the chance, I would gladly stand by, point my finger at them and say:

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"You Focus On The Good": ...