Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWe must file civil suits against Comey
For recovery of our campaign donations / damages
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2913 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We must file civil suits against Comey (Original Post)
DUgosh
Jan 2017
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(120,821 posts)1. "We" don't have legal standing to sue Comey for anything.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)2. With what standing? Legally, this is pretty much LOLcat stuff.
You can contact your Congressional representatives to ask that the whole thing be investigated. Congress has oversight power over the FBI.
But you cannot simply file suit because you don't like what Comey did (the letter to Congress? which was not leaked by Comey's office, I suspect?) and expect to get anywhere. Why not just file suit against Trump for winning the election?
There is the doctrine of qualified immunity which presents a problem:
http://civilrights.findlaw.com/civil-rights-overview/police-misconduct-and-civil-rights.html
The Qualified Immunity Defense
Defense attorneys representing a police officer for any of these claims will raise a defense of qualified immunity. This defense exists to prevent the fear of legal prosecution from inhibiting a police officer from enforcing the law. The defense will defeat a claim against the officer if the officer's conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional or statutory right. In other words, the specific acts the officer prevented the individual from engaging in must be legally protected, otherwise there is no civil rights violation. In order to win a civil rights claim, an individual bringing a police misconduct claim must prove that the actions of the police exceeded reasonable bounds, infringed the victim's constitutional rights, and produced some injury or damages to the victim.
Defense attorneys representing a police officer for any of these claims will raise a defense of qualified immunity. This defense exists to prevent the fear of legal prosecution from inhibiting a police officer from enforcing the law. The defense will defeat a claim against the officer if the officer's conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional or statutory right. In other words, the specific acts the officer prevented the individual from engaging in must be legally protected, otherwise there is no civil rights violation. In order to win a civil rights claim, an individual bringing a police misconduct claim must prove that the actions of the police exceeded reasonable bounds, infringed the victim's constitutional rights, and produced some injury or damages to the victim.
There is the even more basic problem that you cannot show you have a suffered an injury remediable at law. Campaign donations are gifts, not a quid pro quo for which you can lawfully claim to have expected a return sufficient to establish a property right. That sort of "donation" is known as a bribe, and it is quite illegal.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)3. And get laughed out of court? Righttttt.