2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPerhaps our best hope is to convert John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Rand Paul...
Into Democrats and flip the Senate - or at least Independents that caucus with the Democrats.
Maybe even, gulp, Marco Rubio (either Paul or Rubio).
I know it sounds insane - the Hail Mary of all Hail Marys - but each of these guys hates Trump about as much as we do...
If they can be persuaded that the Republican Party is no more - that it is now THE PARTY OF TRUMP - who is partnered with the arch enemy of America - Vladimir Putin's Russia - well, why the hell wouldn't they bolt to try to STOP TRUMP? I think it's possible. (Graham has an election in 2 years - right? But he probably hates Trump the most - and he just may be able to survive that.)
I don't like any of these guys politically - but I do think that each of them believe that they have been trying to do what's best for America.
Anyone agree? If so, how do we give such a "campaign" some kind of subtle nudge? Perhaps contacting Democratic Senators - floating the idea their way that they should consider courting these guys? Perhaps they already are. Even still, hearing their constituents seconding the idea might entice them to consider it more seriously?
get the red out
(13,573 posts)I think it would be worth a shot. I am a Rand Paul constituent.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)The most reasonable of the bunch during the GOP debates. I like a lot of things about his father. If there are "mavericks" in that party - those guys are it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)He was competing with Ted Cruz for the most extreme on the Republican primary stage, and I have him pegged as one of a number of possible conscienceless sociopaths in that lineup. Rubio seeks power and adopts whatever public positions will help him at the moment. And adopting a Democratic cloak would probably not help him with his Koch alliance backers. I hope.
My guess is Rand Paul's moves away from the party extremism are just part of a strategy to use that vacuum to move up in his party. McCaine's the only wild card, but a party leader abandoning his party rather than fighting for the GOP from within...?
But the general idea, of course. For sure our leadership is keeping a careful eye on the few moderate conservatives in congress for any signs that they might consider switching parties.
After all, Elizabeth Warren did back in the 1990s and has been a great asset. In fact, she's just been positioned to move in future up to top leadership.
NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)I think there may be just enough moderate Republicans left who can save the country from Trump and a radical GOP. What would be beautiful would be if all the moderates grow so disgusted that they switch parties.
Two others are Ben Sasse and Jeff Flake that may stand up to the BS.
MrPurple
(985 posts)She might get more credit for being moderate than she deserves. She's up for re-election in 2018 and the Democrats should really try to get a good candidate to knock her out. Hang Trump around her neck as much as possible.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)Collins does seem like a pretty good prospect.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)And many Democrats in Maine like her. I'm guessing that she knows Sessions personally and that is why she would speak on his behalf. She will NOT support radical policy BS, though.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)Also, since she is from Maine, a state with practically no black people, racism is not going to be high on her radar. No Democrat in Maine will beat her. She is well liked and usually one of the first Republicans to come out with a rational voice when it's needed. People from Maine really support her, on both sides.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and if she believes he is, taking a losing stand that would cost her a great deal of political capital is probably doesn't seem like a good strategy.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)She certainly is no racist herself, though she may have had to work with a few (as most all of us have).
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Look at her record
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)Good idea.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)...counting on those folks to be reasonable and calling them "moderate."
The horror.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)But that is where we're at.
MrPurple
(985 posts)So, if there's ever a time for him to stand for principle over party, this would be it.
I'm not sure how being up for re-election would affect Lindsey Graham. He could be worried about getting primaried by a pro Trump candidate in SC, which could happen if he stands up to Trump. That could possibly tone down his criticism.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)And that may be enough. If he gets primaried he can emphasis Trump's coddling of the Russians.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The only scenario I can think of for Lindsay moving to I status would be if McCain said "screw it, I got nothing to lose now" pulled a Stafford himself, and put in a personal pitch for Lindsay to join him on "good of the nation" grounds.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)He's not going to let Trump sell out America to the Russians, Trump disparaged him, and he's always promoted himself as a maverick. I think Lindsey Graham would follow McCain - and say the hell with it!
vi5
(13,305 posts)..Sorry, but part of our problem is giving our most conservative members too much power and say and veto control over what we do as a party when in the majority. The last thing we need is to have any of those clowns running our party and calling the shots.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)We can try reclaim our party leadership tomorrow - let's just try to insure there'll be a tomorrow - and proceed from there .
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Our best hope is not a new bunch of ultra right democrats.
Our best help is obstruction, filibustering, and grandstanding.
Do NOT let a single vote sneak by in the dead of night and burn them every chance we can get.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)heading committees and whatnot. A few members like that are not going to spoil the whole party - we've had blue dogs and dixiecrats, etc. This ain't going to be perfect - desperate measures for desperate times.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)If they want to join us in obstructing that is fine. But we should not invite these guys into the party. They are a big part of the problem.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)Admittedly, there would be some drawbacks...but I think you have to attack an enemy like Trump with whatever resources you can muster.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)some people in the party, the chance of strong conservatives moving over is nil anyway.
NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)Sorry, but I say welcome to ANYONE who wants to stop that orange rat bastard.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,838 posts)Late though it was. A handful of figures like this are not going to reverse all progressive policies in the Democratic party, for crying out loud. (though I do understand people's revulsion towards this suggestion - I'm not crazy about it either - but if these aren't desperate times...and the asshole hasn't even assumed power yet!)
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)But they aren't Democrats and never will be.
NoGoodNamesLeft
(2,056 posts)EOM
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)We have been the nice guys too long, and the Repubs have taken full advantage of every time we compromised.
Look what that has gotten us.
dubyadiprecession
(6,287 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Raise constitutional concerns with Paul, spending concerns with McCaine, etc. at the same time, they have built their image for times like this. Republicans will be sending some pork their way.
BainsBane
(54,728 posts)They aren't even close to Democrats.