2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow Donald Trump Could Have Been Taken Down With 8 Simple Words
It was a steamy sunny afternoon in my Philadelphia hotel lobby during the third day of the 2016 Democratic National Convention. I was there to retrieve a package from the desk and was waiting in line while two other customers were talking about the upcoming election.
One man, a Hillary Clinton staffer, was engaging with a woman who claimed to be a pro-Trump voter. He was exhorting her not to vote for Trump for the usual reasons: hes not what he says, hes racist, hes insane
The two continued their back and fourth to nowhere until I broke in, leaving her time to get away from the conversation I sensed she was a bit annoyed with anyway.
You know how Donald Trump could have been defeated with eight simple words during the primary? I asked the Hillary staffer.
How is that? he asked.
The first time he told someone to shut up during one of the debates, like he did to Jeb Bush, all Jeb would have had to reply with was Then come over here and shut me up.
Full piece
uponit7771
(91,830 posts)... know not to fuck with you next time !!
People need to learn human pathology when it comes to bullies especially sofF handed bullies like Benedict Donald.
Anyone imagine that guy want to throw some !?
Anyone?!
Me either
votesparks
(1,288 posts)uponit7771
(91,830 posts)votesparks
(1,288 posts)TrekLuver
(2,573 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Trump lies more than any person I can think of, he brags about sexually assaulting women, he indicated that nearly all Mexican immigrants are "rapists and drug dealers," he's committed massive fraud (e.g., Trump University), he never released his tax returns, he surrounds himself with and nominates overt racists, he nominates individuals to run agencies/departments that they despise, he suggested violence against his political opponent, his speeches are substanceless ("We're looking at jobs--big league jobs." and virtually incoherent ("word salad" is how some have described his statements), he makes comments as outlandish as anything said by President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho, he repeatedly evades questions (such as when asked for some indication as to what will replace the ACA), he mocked and denied mocking a reporter with a disability, etc., etc., etc.
And I haven't even mentioned the Russia connection, which we knew about before the election.
But Jeb Bush saying "Then come over here and shut me up" would have ended Trump's campaign?!? M'kay.
Trump would have replied with something like, "I would but I'm a gentleman." Or, "It's good to see you finally show a bit of energy, Jeb." His cult following would have laughed and that'd be the end of that.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)would have made a hiss sound as Donald stood there unwilling and/or able to make his orders come to fruition. And the tough-guy mirage would have faded into the air. Instead, Jeb took it like someone who is afraid to stand up for themselves.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)later. Heck, I bet he would have moved toward Clinton.
His white wing supporters would have applauded.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I will bet his supporters got excited
dionysus
(26,467 posts)and like most bullies, i bet you a million bucks he's a coward who never threw a punch in his life.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)He is definitely a bully.
MrPurple
(985 posts)Don't think anyone was going to outbully Trump. But, when Trump called Jeb Bush low energy, he should have responded that he's level headed and that helped him manage a complex state, but that Trump is full of bad, erratic, unstable energy.
He should have replied that being calm is an asset and turned the energy thing into a negative for Trump. Instead, he roughly low fived Trump and tried to act more "high energy" in their interactions, which made Trump look dominant, since he was controlling Jeb's behavior.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)It's calling the bully out.
uponit7771
(91,830 posts)... he's about as soft as wet cotton.
It doesn't matter how this is approached or what form its just Benedict Donald is has a big mouth and little conviction and those type of people are easiest to shut up.
MrPurple
(985 posts)Trump had years of experience playing to the cameras and his audience. If Jeb had said that, Trump would have responded with something like, "Oh yeah, Jeb, Mr. Tough Guy. I don't need to come over there because I'm at 30% and you're at 5% and pretty soon you're going to be off the stage. Low energy Jeb".
I agree that if Trump was on his own on a subway platform, he wouldn't stand up to a challenge. But, on a debate stage, you're not going to beat him in a WWE smackdown. The problem was more that Jeb smiled at Trump's attacks like they were amusing and acted like a golden retriever. He should have turned the tables on what Trump was saying and said that he was full of dangerous, erratic high energy.
Hillary actually handled Trump well in the debates, I thought.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)Not backing down, following by, "look America, he's all show and no go" would have gone a long way.
Hillary handled him much better, agreed.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)I've never seen someone get so dominated in every presidential debate. Trump is substanceless and incoherent.
But it didn't make a damn bit of difference to his cult following.
As you said and as I wrote above, Trump would have had a comeback, Bush would have been neutralized and that'd be that.
Consider all that Trump has gotten away with. And Bush challenging Trump to make him shut up would have ended Trump's campaign? Seriously?
MrPurple
(985 posts)And she rose in the polls after each debate. 54% of the public voted against Trump, but a much higher percentage thought Hillary won the debates.
I know a lot of the public really had issues with Hillary and the emails and the timing of Comey fictitiously bringing Anthony Weiner into the picture was lethal, but I still find it hard to believe that Trump actually won without some serious help from voter suppression.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)In such a tight race, any number of factors (voter suppression made easier by the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, FBI/Comey, piss-poor media coverage, Russia, etc.) could have been the difference between winning and losing the electoral college vote.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)I believe liberals, tending to be reality based, are usually right ehen we think we've won, and can even admit when we haven't done so well.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)That could just be me being subjective again, but we're talking about someone in Trump who is substanceless and virtually incoherent.
I don't know how any objective analysis (if such a thing is even truly possible) would reach a different conclusion.
JI7
(90,653 posts)MrPurple
(985 posts)I think that was a critical point in the primary. Trump had lost Iowa, Rubio was surging in the polls going into NH and then days before the primary, Rubio imploded in that debate. If Trump opened up losing both Iowa & NH he would have had a different trajectory and Rubio would have become the frontrunner then.
TeamPooka
(25,302 posts)Vinca
(51,104 posts)He should have pissed back.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,849 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Cowardice is very strong in Republicans.
LisaM
(28,651 posts)They would have had to come from the media, though.
"We're not going to fawn over your candidacy".