Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
105 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did anyone else note that many of the jackpine nutties are (Original Post) boston bean Jan 2017 OP
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #1
Or if he had won, there would be no Trump stuff posted here. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 #11
Excuse me? So who do you want to post here? nt babylonsister Jan 2017 #13
Is this sarcasm? uppityperson Jan 2017 #15
I've never seen RT, but is it really a pro Russia network with Larry King and Ed Schultz? napi21 Jan 2017 #2
I'd say it is... Blanks Jan 2017 #6
Yes it is. Even Skinner has commented on RT several times going back several years. JTFrog Jan 2017 #9
we used to remove that link. mopinko Jan 2017 #24
It ought to go back to the nyetski list. Squinch Jan 2017 #27
Unfortunately, they give RT a false legitimacy, so people don't realize it's a Russian propaganda Fla Dem Jan 2017 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2017 #29
It is, they're wholly owned by Putin and the government. Former employees synergie Jan 2017 #57
And Thom Hartman as well. n/t totodeinhere Jan 2017 #70
Schultz has gone over to the dark side brush Jan 2017 #82
RT is way more than just "Pro-Russia" Putin controls it Maru Kitteh Jan 2017 #101
I totally noticed bravenak Jan 2017 #3
Another big favorite of BoB types is Assad. DanTex Jan 2017 #4
And Momar Qaddafi, too! Pinebaggers are very sure he was Maru Kitteh Jan 2017 #102
Oh, yeah, I remember those threads. DanTex Jan 2017 #104
Many of them could be trolls NoGoodNamesLeft Jan 2017 #5
That's where I'd put my money. eom BlueCaliDem Jan 2017 #10
Yes probably Russian trolls. True_Blue Jan 2017 #22
Probably.....nt 2naSalit Jan 2017 #31
+1, they are no doubt Benedict Donald level lovers of Pooty Poot uponit7771 Jan 2017 #45
Some Russian trolls are really active on that site Gothmog Jan 2017 #7
Why do you continue to bring up another forum? Edited to add... uppityperson Jan 2017 #8
Because it's a shining example of Russia's influence. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #12
Plus it's a flat out untrue statement that she made. boston bean Jan 2017 #18
+1 nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #68
Why are you insinuating something so untrue?? boston bean Jan 2017 #17
What's untrue? You've brought up jpr before. Why don't you just answer my question? uppityperson Jan 2017 #19
Prove it. I am not answering a false accusation. boston bean Jan 2017 #20
I'm not going to search 28000 posts and many people have brought up jpr. I don't understand uppityperson Jan 2017 #21
What a joke. boston bean Jan 2017 #23
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #26
So nice you are. boston bean Jan 2017 #30
Thank you, it's good to be appreciated. uppityperson Jan 2017 #34
I feel very much appreciated! boston bean Jan 2017 #41
IOW you can't prove it. Cha Jan 2017 #44
pretty much..... that would be the obvious case. boston bean Jan 2017 #75
You have a star. A search would have been very quick and easy on DU. kcr Jan 2017 #64
You made the accusation. It's up to you to defend it. yardwork Jan 2017 #69
So.. you make the assertion, and won't defend it. Amimnoch Jan 2017 #63
I peeked over there just now.. Tavarious Jackson Jan 2017 #14
Funny. I post at both places and don't see that (rooting for Trump) at all. MelissaB Jan 2017 #36
It took me less than a few seconds to find pro Trump crap Tavarious Jackson Jan 2017 #38
yahhhh Ellipsis Jan 2017 #40
All you have are personal attacks.. you're calling the poster "Joe McCarthy" Cha Jan 2017 #58
Not at all true. Ellipsis Jan 2017 #65
I'll admit that much like you, I find it much easier to cower behind implication LanternWaste Jan 2017 #86
Its simpler then your interpetation Ellipsis Jan 2017 #90
You post at a place where people have "Lock Her Up" in their sig lines. Maven Jan 2017 #55
+1 Cha Jan 2017 #59
I saw Alex Jones videos. Sexist rants including the c-word. And all the RT propaganda you can eat. JTFrog Jan 2017 #66
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2017 #46
I went there exactly once during the general election and it was so obvious that there was Russian Dream Girl Jan 2017 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Turn CO Blue Jan 2017 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2017 #28
Big RT fans mcar Jan 2017 #32
don't they get ad revenue every time you click over there to check up on them? Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Jan 2017 #48
That's just what they want us to believe Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2017 #49
That's hilarious, really. MelissaB Jan 2017 #35
That's pretty wild shit. NCTraveler Jan 2017 #50
They might actually be Russians posing as US citizens saying they are Democratic voters. UCmeNdc Jan 2017 #37
Oh for f's sake.... PassingFair Jan 2017 #39
Except HUAC had consequences, while our benign speculation is little more than simple benign specula LanternWaste Jan 2017 #87
Jackass Deplorables. oasis Jan 2017 #42
+1000 boston bean Jan 2017 #43
+1 uponit7771 Jan 2017 #47
Maybe we need a special forum for them. Turbineguy Jan 2017 #51
K&R sheshe2 Jan 2017 #52
.. Cha Jan 2017 #62
... sheshe2 Jan 2017 #72
Now now, there there. NanceGreggs Jan 2017 #53
Geez Nance! haha boston bean Jan 2017 #54
"They never wavered from their stance that HRC was running a child sex-slave operation from the.. Cha Jan 2017 #60
And until one of their fellow idiots showed up there with a gun. okasha Jan 2017 #84
Quite a few were hoodwinked by RT, I remember a friend on FB, who was delighted synergie Jan 2017 #56
Willingly "hoodwinked".. Cha Jan 2017 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Jan 2017 #67
Mission accomplished. The propaganda worked as intended. yardwork Jan 2017 #73
" RT is watched now by over 50 million US households. It is the ANTI-FOX network." SidDithers Jan 2017 #71
Well look at that. nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #74
omg.. "serious questions"! Cha Jan 2017 #76
LOL Scurrilous Jan 2017 #78
That entire thread is gold... SidDithers Jan 2017 #81
Handles I hadn't seen in months. okasha Jan 2017 #83
And some that are here and very pro putin. boston bean Jan 2017 #93
Dictator, murderer, gangster-- okasha Jan 2017 #94
Why are you obsessed with giving them so much publicity? mtnsnake Jan 2017 #77
Why are you obsessed with my alleged obsession? boston bean Jan 2017 #79
Good one mtnsnake Jan 2017 #80
I'm not sure they'd enjoy knowing a lot of their traffic is hate-reading. kcr Jan 2017 #85
I just saw this on that website Gothmog Jan 2017 #88
"All" (actually 89%) of their traffic is from US & Can mathematic Jan 2017 #96
And even less (77.8%) of DU's traffic is from the US and Canada Contrary1 Jan 2017 #98
I agree, there are russian trolls here too mathematic Jan 2017 #99
The Mothership: Scurrilous Jan 2017 #89
Didn't they used to be Progressive Independent? Tinoire's site? n/t seaglass Jan 2017 #91
Yep. n/t Scurrilous Jan 2017 #92
Wow, that place is still alive?... SidDithers Jan 2017 #95
Just them and the tumbleweeds. Scurrilous Jan 2017 #97
I go check that board just to see what is going on in that alternative reality Gothmog Jan 2017 #100
K&R betsuni Jan 2017 #103

Response to boston bean (Original post)

napi21

(45,806 posts)
2. I've never seen RT, but is it really a pro Russia network with Larry King and Ed Schultz?
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:23 PM
Jan 2017

I KNOW Ed Schultz wasn't when he was on MSNBC!

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
9. Yes it is. Even Skinner has commented on RT several times going back several years.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:45 PM
Jan 2017

It's a government funded mouthpiece for the Kremlin.

mopinko

(71,741 posts)
24. we used to remove that link.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 04:32 PM
Jan 2017

till people made a big deal out of it. once they picked up hartmann, it got accepted. mission accomplished.

he and eddie are mostly in the- stir up discord any where you can- camp. fuel the purists. turn up their volume.

Fla Dem

(25,643 posts)
105. Unfortunately, they give RT a false legitimacy, so people don't realize it's a Russian propaganda
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 09:28 AM
Jan 2017

network. Any respect I had for Hartmann, King or Schultz has evaporated.

Response to JTFrog (Reply #9)

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
57. It is, they're wholly owned by Putin and the government. Former employees
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 12:42 AM
Jan 2017

are pretty clear about how hands on they are with what's reported. Even Larry King and Ed have made it clear they do not enjoy freedom. They do get a paycheck.

brush

(57,394 posts)
82. Schultz has gone over to the dark side
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 03:45 PM
Jan 2017

Seems he goes where the money is.

He was a righty before he posed as a blue-collar progressive on MSNBC.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
4. Another big favorite of BoB types is Assad.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:27 PM
Jan 2017

It's hilarious. Hillary wasn't legitimately the nominee because somehow the primaries were "rigged" but Assad is the legitimately elected, benevolent leader of Syria, beloved by his people.

The nuttiness of the far left has really been exposed this last year.

Maru Kitteh

(29,053 posts)
102. And Momar Qaddafi, too! Pinebaggers are very sure he was
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 04:50 AM
Jan 2017

a really great, beloved, innocent awesome guy - until Hillary personally cut his beating heart out of his chest with a Ginsu knife from the 70's.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
104. Oh, yeah, I remember those threads.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 08:11 AM
Jan 2017

There was some internet meme going around about how under Gadafi there was no poverty and everyone got free everything and life was bliss for all Libyans. LOL.

 

NoGoodNamesLeft

(2,056 posts)
5. Many of them could be trolls
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:29 PM
Jan 2017

Who were part of the massive online misinformation campaign to elect the orange asshole.

True_Blue

(3,063 posts)
22. Yes probably Russian trolls.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 04:28 PM
Jan 2017

I read an article the other day here on DU, that Putin has trolls in Canada now trying to influence the election there. Apparently, trolls must be pretty effective in affecting the outcome of elections. The right is absolutely horrible at governing, but they win elections because they're masters at getting you to take your eye off the ball.

uppityperson

(115,844 posts)
8. Why do you continue to bring up another forum? Edited to add...
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:43 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:13 PM - Edit history (1)

I was curious what the fascination is with jpr with some duers as I don't understand. I did not mean it as an accusation but as a question because, as I said, I don't understand and wanted to. It's that simple.

Due to the lack of an answer from you about my question, the continuing snarkage replies that I am lying and demands to prove my "accusation" that you've written about jpr have led me to trash this forum.

I will not answer further here because it's obvious that no discussion, no attempt to understand or answer my simple question and enlighten me will happen which is a shame.

uppityperson

(115,844 posts)
21. I'm not going to search 28000 posts and many people have brought up jpr. I don't understand
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 04:28 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:33 PM - Edit history (1)

why continue to post about another forum like jpr or why deny you've mentioned them. I apologise for not noticing what forum this was before getting into this as I try to not get into stuff in here as too often things end up in nothing positive.

In answer to the replies, no. I'm not going to search 28000 posts to prove that you mentioned another forum when my question has never been addressed.

That question being why is jpr being brought up again? Further question is why continue infighting when we could be working together to try and help each other survive the next bit?

All that said, I am dropping this now, will not answer anymore here, to you or others who choose to reply.

Response to boston bean (Reply #23)

yardwork

(64,102 posts)
69. You made the accusation. It's up to you to defend it.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 12:30 PM
Jan 2017

You need to defend your statement.

Meanwhile, I personally have brought up JPR several times. Why? Because I think that site was one of many funded by Putin to convince useful idiots to spread lies about the Democratic nominee, in order to get Trump elected. It worked. We should pay attention.

 

Tavarious Jackson

(1,595 posts)
14. I peeked over there just now..
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 03:58 PM
Jan 2017

and many of them are rooting for Trump. They're not true progressives. They're " my way the highway" distorted people. Yes, they humped Russia propaganda, even in the primaries.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
86. I'll admit that much like you, I find it much easier to cower behind implication
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 11:41 AM
Jan 2017

I'll admit that much like you, I find it much easier to cower behind implication than state what we actually mean. The post-advantage is that we can rationalize our emotive vagueness as a clear and concise missive that only clever people understand, thus allowing us even more self-validation.

Ellipsis

(9,178 posts)
90. Its simpler then your interpetation
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 02:02 PM
Jan 2017






It's just difficult for me to compose on a keyboard.


I'll try to elaborate later... On the whole JPR thing.



 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
66. I saw Alex Jones videos. Sexist rants including the c-word. And all the RT propaganda you can eat.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 12:13 PM
Jan 2017


 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
16. I went there exactly once during the general election and it was so obvious that there was Russian
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 04:03 PM
Jan 2017

Influence...then it struck me they were probably on DU so I posted that here and was roundly ridiculed. I'm pretty intuitive. Not sure exactly how I knew but got a strong vibe...

Response to boston bean (Original post)

Response to boston bean (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
33. don't they get ad revenue every time you click over there to check up on them?
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 06:08 PM
Jan 2017

You realize you're just putting $ in their pockets with this obsessive behavior.

I've been there to look around maybe once. Yawn.

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #33)

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
50. That's pretty wild shit.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 10:16 PM
Jan 2017

OP nailed it. I don't expect much from a group who Han numerous member cheering at the thought of Clinton dying and men lining up to piss on her face. I also see some names there who were banned here for being openly racist. Think they are the same people? Maybe it's others trying to make them look this ignorant and hateful.

UCmeNdc

(9,650 posts)
37. They might actually be Russians posing as US citizens saying they are Democratic voters.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 06:34 PM
Jan 2017

With a computer and a foreign sovereign country supporting you anything is possible.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
87. Except HUAC had consequences, while our benign speculation is little more than simple benign specula
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 11:46 AM
Jan 2017

Except HUAC had consequences, while our benign speculation is little more than simple benign speculation lacking any consequence of any measure or degree.

No doubt, were it Free Republic we were discussing, your rationalization sound even more obvious (since we're going by what it "sounds" like and all...).

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
53. Now now, there there.
Sat Jan 7, 2017, 11:17 PM
Jan 2017

Let’s not rush to judgment of our JPR friends.

They were the first reporters on the scene to tell us that Hillary was lying to the public about the fact that she is dying of dozens of fatal diseases – which she has apparently and miraculously recovered from since she lost the election.

They had no qualms about reporting that HRC has had her political adversaries murdered in cold blood – another story that has disappeared since the election.

They refused to be intimated by the fact that “Clinton thugs” beat-up Bernie the night of the Convention in order to get him to concede.

They never wavered from their stance that HRC was running a child sex-slave operation from the basement of a pizza place – well, until they were ridiculed into retracting that story because it was beyond laughable.

They continue to proffer themselves as True Progressives ™ while posting links to RW sources as proof of their progressive bona fides.

Let's be fair. Just because JPR folks are know-nothing idiots who spew absolute bullshit is no reason to ridicule them as know-nothing idiots who spew absolute bullshit.







Cha

(305,181 posts)
60. "They never wavered from their stance that HRC was running a child sex-slave operation from the..
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 05:07 AM
Jan 2017
basement of a pizza place – well, until they were ridiculed into retracting that story because it was beyond laughable."

That's the only way they'll stop posting a particular pos propaganda.
 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
56. Quite a few were hoodwinked by RT, I remember a friend on FB, who was delighted
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 12:41 AM
Jan 2017

in this new site that had "good" stories, most of which reinforced his false beliefs, and encouraged his hatred of the DNC and Hillary. He and his GF were huge fans. Sadly they had few arguments based in any reason, but a whole lot of anger and misinformation to fuel their Hillary and DNC hate.

Response to synergie (Reply #56)

boston bean

(36,466 posts)
93. And some that are here and very pro putin.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 02:52 PM
Jan 2017

Putin is a brutal dictator.

Reading that thread in hindsight is mind blowing!!

mtnsnake

(22,236 posts)
77. Why are you obsessed with giving them so much publicity?
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:09 PM
Jan 2017

when any publicity is good publicity, as the saying goes..

kcr

(15,522 posts)
85. I'm not sure they'd enjoy knowing a lot of their traffic is hate-reading.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 09:55 AM
Jan 2017

I haven't been there in a while but I admit, they were a guilty pleasure of mine during the election. I saw more than one post by the admin, crowing about how popular they're getting, and she seemed like she thought it was genuine interest.

Gothmog

(154,181 posts)
88. I just saw this on that website
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:41 PM
Jan 2017

If you have to deny something like this, then you are fighting a losing battle http://www.jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/im-not-a-russian-troll/ Being a russian troll on JPR is a good thing

mathematic

(1,490 posts)
96. "All" (actually 89%) of their traffic is from US & Can
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 04:53 PM
Jan 2017

The graphic they use to show where their visitors come from doesn't add up to 100%.

Just goes to show you the shallow thinking echo chamber they got over there when they post an image and then boldly lie about its contents and nobody calls them on it.

Not like that's a reliable graphic anyway, considering how those visitor trackers can be fooled, but 11% missing traffic is more than enough to account for russian propagandists.

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
98. And even less (77.8%) of DU's traffic is from the US and Canada
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 06:05 PM
Jan 2017

Adds up to 85.2% when figuring in the UK, Japan, and Germany. 14.8% missing traffic is also more than enough to account for Russian propagandists.

mathematic

(1,490 posts)
99. I agree, there are russian trolls here too
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 06:14 PM
Jan 2017

Thankfully people are starting to wake up to that and the trolls will have a harder time purveying their garbage lies.

SidDithers

(44,249 posts)
95. Wow, that place is still alive?...
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 04:38 PM
Jan 2017

Is it still just blindpig and Orwellian_ghost posting to each other?



Sid

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Did anyone else note that...