2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTo be fair and just: We need a do over of the presidential election. eom.
putitinD
(1,551 posts)Takket
(22,515 posts)The Founding Fathers and hence the Constitution never could have forseen something like this, but now that it has happened, our lawmakers need to get to work on making sure this never happens again.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,701 posts)MFM008
(20,000 posts)like my dad used to tell me. Look it up.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,701 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Nowhere in it is instructions for a do-over election.
There's your citation.
Takket
(22,515 posts)zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)There is no way, at this point, to prevent him from taking office. After he takes office, the constitutional ways to remove him are few and all require the support, the MAJORITY support of his party and/or his cabinet. And in ANY of the cases, there is no mechanism for any new election. There is a long line of succession and NONE of it results in Hillary or ANY democrat being president.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,846 posts)The Justice Department - this can be blocked if the Supreme Court says so. A. Kennedy is probably not a big fan of Putin or Trump.
zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)I'm curious what grounds the SC would use to "block" the inauguration of a president. I'm speaking specifically of the text in the constitution that allows them to do this.
Hekate
(94,626 posts)....deranged behavior, necessity of an exam at Walter Reed). Necessity to examine all these things and delay the swearing-in, so neither Trump nor Pence would be president until it was concluded.
Hubby and I ended up talking about this at like 3am to 4am this morning, sitting up in bed in the dark. He is convinced that SCOTUS could take this on IF (and only if) someone with standing brings a case to them. They cannot act unless someone brings them something. Their precedent for interfering in a presidential election is that they already did that once. Granted, the circumstances were different, but they DID step in.
I wonder if anyone at all in DC is working on this. I wonder if anyone at all has the balls to proceed.
zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)There is no mechanism for preventing an inauguration after the EC has voted and the congress has accepted. The SC has no authority to do that. He can take the oath of office from jail if necessary. The SC has no authority to address competency, only the cabinet can do that, and only AFTER he has taken the oath of office. Only congress can act at this point and it would be extraordinary if they did, and even they can't stop him from taking the oath.
TDale313
(7,822 posts)Sad to say, but true.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)kairos12
(13,247 posts)A Day in the Life of Ivandumassovitch.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Of course, this would also entail a do-over of the primaries which some may be less than enthusiastic about.
Hekate
(94,626 posts)....for not showing up in the midterms, while the GOPee always puts some red meat on the ballot to bring their people to the polls.
So go to it, Democrats. 2018 is practically around the corner. What are our red meat issues that we should be putting on the ballot so our lazy voters will show up?
NRaleighLiberal
(60,497 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)CrispyQ
(38,244 posts)Maybe we wouldn't be in this mess if they hadn't always played nice.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,701 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)There is no one with the authority to declare that, much less force it to happen.
sheshe2
(87,469 posts)many will die, slowly and painfully with out our safety nets.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Paying into Social Security since I was 14 is starting to look more and more like a Madoff Ponzie scheme.
sheshe2
(87,469 posts)Have used ACA since July. I can't apply for Medicare until later this year. Yup, they just want us to die.
Aristus
(68,328 posts)libtodeath
(2,892 posts)I dont give a fuck about "mechanisms" the vast majority would support it.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)A majority of people that voted for Hillary wouldn't support such a thing. I can guarantee that a majority of the population does not.
Amishman
(5,810 posts)Invalidating the election (no matter what the reasoning) would cause a civil war
jzodda
(2,124 posts)Unfortunately the electors are done and congress has certified the results. There is no stopping this train any longer.
If you think the Republicans in Congress are goin to turn on Trump, at least in the short time, it's just not going to happen.
Once he becomes President we on the left Wil be in the most powerless position in my entire life. Both at the federal, state and soon to be Supreme Court.
We must build from the ground up.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Black-box voting, black-box campaign financing and black-box MSM complicity did us in.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)LeftInTX
(29,998 posts)And a see-into-the-future machine