2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumReport: Powerful labor union plans massive budget cuts in wake of Donald Trump victory
CBS NewsRight to Work laws have already proven to be a serious blow to labor unions ability to flex political muscle in states like Wisconsin and Michigan, two longtime Democratic bastions that voted for Mr. Trump last month.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/seiu-labor-union-massive-budget-cuts-in-wake-of-donald-trump-victory/
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)and taking steps to ensure their survival. If only the Democratic Party would follow suit... and I think putting Keith Ellison in charge of the DNC would be a great start.
MichMan
(13,166 posts)I'm not a member, so really doesn't affect me personally, but just commenting on what was posted
Something doesn't add up here. Almost seems like they had significant expenditures in 2016 that were outpacing current dues income. Was it the "Fight for $15"?
Why make cuts now based on something that hasn't yet happened? I would be interested in seeing figures on how many SEIU members have opted out Michigan & Wisconsin to understand the effects of RTW.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Their finances can't have taken a 30% hit already, and I doubt they will see a 30% reduction in membership is the course of one year.
Amishman
(5,810 posts)If the fear is that members will soon have a choice on membership and might leave, shouldn't the approach be to prove your value so they want to stay?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)With Republican dominance in Washington, the threats to SEIU will get more grave: Everything from slashing health-care spending to passing a federal law extending Right to Work to all private-sector employees could be on the table. One of the most widely expected scenarios is that a Trump appointee will provide the decisive fifth vote on the Supreme Court's labor cases. The court already ruled in 2014 that making government-funded home health aides pay union fees violated the First Amendment, and a future case could apply the same logic to all government employees, effectively making the whole public sector Right to Work. SEIU was bracing for such a ruling earlier this year, in a case called Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, but got an unexpected reprieve when Justice Antonin Scalia's death left the court tied, four to four. With several similar cases brought by union opponents already making their way through lower courts, it may not last for long.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-27/fear-of-trump-triggers-deep-spending-cuts-by-nation-s-second-largest-union
MichMan
(13,166 posts)The Michigan home health care aides referenced were family members receiving a state stipend for caring for their own disabled relatives. 80% did leave the SEIU after they were allowed by the legislature. This occurred 4 yrs ago, so not anything new related to Trump.
I am all for people having union representation if they desire, but something about this particular situation always bothered me. A parent taking care of a disabled child in their own home doesn't seem like a situation that falls under the scope of an employee with collective bargaining contracts
I am interested in knowing the affect of the RTW law in the state. How many people have opted out?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Wisconsin and Michigan are just 2 out of 50.
Union membership and dues are down annually. More and more states are going RTW.
A 10-30% decline in forecast revenue over the next two years? When growth is being inhibited and payroll deductions for dues are being stopped by courts across the nation?
How is this some 'mystery' to you?