Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJill Abramson: who owns the economic ideas that must rejuvenate the Democrats?
The Clintons turned the Democratic party over to donors. Can it recover?Jill Abramson
The Guardian
But Bill and Hillary Clinton are the people responsible for turning the Democratic party into the party of Wall Street and their glitzy friends. During his time in office, Bill Clinton did little to change a campaign finance system that has always been fundamentally at odds with the partys egalitarian message.
It isnt just that Democrats are the minority party in Washington, its that theyve lost state governments at all levels, from governorships to the state legislatures. While the Democrats have focused on gaining and holding the White House since 2008, the Koch brothers and their billionaire, rightwing allies have been showering money on local candidates, too, and the payoff has been huge.
Hillary Clinton did not have a cogent economic message. This was the most serious failing of her campaign. It is also the biggest challenge facing the Democratic party as it tries to rebuild with an alliance of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren liberals and the financiers who have funded the party since Bill Clintons victory in 1992.
Of course, the Sanders-Warren economic message is at war with Wall Street interests. So who owns the economic ideas that must rejuvenate the Democrats as Trump and his new cabinet try to rip apart the social programs that are the signature accomplishments of Democratic presidents from Johnson to Obama?
How will the Democrats approach trade, another issue that deeply divides Wall Street donors from the Democratic rank and file. Perhaps most important, who are the best thinkers and activists who can begin to answer these questions?
Everyone I have talked to in the party is still too stunned and angry over Trumps upset win to really get their heads around the daunting work ahead. Democrats are still obsessed with Russian interference in the election and with blaming the FBI director, James Comey, for defeating Clinton. These, too, are important subjects, but dont help shape the future.
It isnt just that Democrats are the minority party in Washington, its that theyve lost state governments at all levels, from governorships to the state legislatures. While the Democrats have focused on gaining and holding the White House since 2008, the Koch brothers and their billionaire, rightwing allies have been showering money on local candidates, too, and the payoff has been huge.
Hillary Clinton did not have a cogent economic message. This was the most serious failing of her campaign. It is also the biggest challenge facing the Democratic party as it tries to rebuild with an alliance of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren liberals and the financiers who have funded the party since Bill Clintons victory in 1992.
Of course, the Sanders-Warren economic message is at war with Wall Street interests. So who owns the economic ideas that must rejuvenate the Democrats as Trump and his new cabinet try to rip apart the social programs that are the signature accomplishments of Democratic presidents from Johnson to Obama?
How will the Democrats approach trade, another issue that deeply divides Wall Street donors from the Democratic rank and file. Perhaps most important, who are the best thinkers and activists who can begin to answer these questions?
Everyone I have talked to in the party is still too stunned and angry over Trumps upset win to really get their heads around the daunting work ahead. Democrats are still obsessed with Russian interference in the election and with blaming the FBI director, James Comey, for defeating Clinton. These, too, are important subjects, but dont help shape the future.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1937 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jill Abramson: who owns the economic ideas that must rejuvenate the Democrats? (Original Post)
portlander23
Dec 2016
OP
presidential elections are driven by culture in the absence of a bad economy.
geek tragedy
Dec 2016
#4
putitinD
(1,551 posts)1. Bernie Sanders...its too bad DWS made sure he didn't get a fair chance.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)2. FFS, give it a rest.
He got a fair chance and he lost, by a lot.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)3. If the system is fueled by money, what trumps money?
Enthusiasm. Wile money is necessary, voter enthusiasm is even more necessary. The turnout in key states was lower. Some of that was due to a lack of enthusiasm.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)4. presidential elections are driven by culture in the absence of a bad economy.
if the economy under Trump is bad, they have a pretty easy task.
If the economy is okay under Trump, it will require cultural/psychological appeals rather than economics
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)5. Clinton presented excellent plans for the economy...
And talked about them daily. That's why she won voters with the economy as their number one concern.
Clinton was that person.
I recognize what is going on here.
Article is absolute bullshit.