Does anyone still consider VOX a credible source?

[philosslayer]

I don't.

http://www.vox.com/2016/11/2/13491754/how-to-rig-the-us-presidential-election

[jonno99]

1. Credible? Yes. Infallible? No. nt

[LisaM]

2. It's not a news source, it's an Op-Ed site.

Some of their writers are better than others.

The thing about influencing elections - it's easiest to do if you simply suppress the vote, or make it difficult to vote. Or spread disinformation that deters voting. Or gerrymander the vote. These are the easiest paths, and IMO, this is what the GOP has been aiming at for a long time.

[Skinner]

3. Yes

Nobody should get their news from one source, and that goes for Vox too. But it is a good source when consumed as part of a broad-based and balanced news diet.

[mythology]

4. I notice you didn't add the evidence that the article is wrong

There is no vote rigging. There is no evidence that there is vote rigging.

[philosslayer]

6. You don't think the vote was rigged?

have you not been paying attention to what's going on in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin?

[NobodyHere]

10. The vote was rigged?

Does Hillary Clinton know about this?

Or was she in on it?

[cry baby]

5. Yes, credible opinions. nt

[Stellar]

7. I do consider Vox legitimate...

or should I say that I consider Ezra Klein to be very trustworthy. He knows his ish!

[m-lekktor]

8. well, it was founded by Ezra Klein.

I suppose it depends on what one thinks of him. I am sure he is popular here on DU.

[philosslayer]

9. Well in the article

He tried to convince us that rigging an election was virtually impossible. Clearly he was way off

[La Lioness Priyanka]

11. yes, it is almost impossible to rig a US election

just because you dont agree with that, doesn't mean they are wrong or that vox is not credible.