2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIn Michigan - Mismatched Numbers Mean Precincts Can't Be Recounted
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/05/mismatched-numbers-means-precincts-cant-recounted/95015066/Here's a new wrinkle reported in the Detroit Free Press - WTF
Sorry - can't get the link to post - go to freep.com
the person changed his mind about voting, and left with the ballot?
rzemanfl
(30,282 posts)Response to geo1 (Original post)
JudyM This message was self-deleted by its author.
benld74
(9,989 posts)The GOP loves state rights SO much.
Nothing is standardized even within the state itself!
Mass confusion is what they love all the while complaining about stolen votes!
They spread their lies.
Their followers recite idiotic mantras which mean nothing.
FBaggins
(27,636 posts)One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.
Michigans largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldnt reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books dont match with ballots cant be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
ChetSinger
(14 posts)The article implies that the discrepancies are due to ballots being put through the machines multiple times.
If these precincts are not recounted Hillary can't make up votes here. Yet if they are I would expect her vote count to drop more than Trump's because any multiples will be counted only once.
FBaggins
(27,636 posts)Looking at Wisconsin (or really almost any paper-ballot state)... a fair percentage of precincts are going to be off by a vote or two (for many of the reasons listed). That shouldn't make them ineligible for recount.
ChetSinger
(14 posts)The article didn't specify. I hope there's more detail available tomorrow.