Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Asian Group

YoshidaYui

(44,845 posts) Wed Dec 10, 2025, 06:02 PM Wednesday

Avoid these instant noodles

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Avoid these instant noodles (Original Post) YoshidaYui Wednesday OP

Lotus Foods Rice Ramen and Nissan Raoh are the safe brands. TexasTowelie Wednesday #1

Use those noodles... ultralite001 Wednesday #2

Now Robert Kennedy should be on this not vacines Oppaloopa Thursday #3

Pass this to people you love or even just like Oppaloopa Thursday #4

TexasTowelie

(124,875 posts)

1. Lotus Foods Rice Ramen and Nissan Raoh are the safe brands.

Reply to YoshidaYui (Original post)

Wed Dec 10, 2025, 06:39 PM

Wednesday

Twenty minutes of otherwise wasted time repeatedly telling us after each product that high sodium is bad for people watching their cardiac health.

ultralite001

(2,349 posts)

2. Use those noodles...

Reply to YoshidaYui (Original post)

Wed Dec 10, 2025, 08:05 PM

Wednesday

+ ditch the flavour packet...

Cook the noodles in a cup or two of bone broth of any flavour... or use Better than Bouillon, any flavor,
prepared per the bottle directions... or leftover beef, chicken or vegetable stock...

Cook the noodles in the stock + whip in a beaten egg... Instant Egg Drop soup...

Crumble the noodles over salads for extra crunch...

Oppaloopa

(930 posts)

3. Now Robert Kennedy should be on this not vacines

Reply to YoshidaYui (Original post)

Thu Dec 11, 2025, 03:05 PM

Thursday

Oppaloopa

(930 posts)

4. Pass this to people you love or even just like

Reply to YoshidaYui (Original post)

Thu Dec 11, 2025, 03:07 PM

Thursday

Reply to this discussion