Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Weather Watchers
Related: About this forumWould Trump privatize weather forecasting? What to know.
Would Trump privatize weather forecasting? What to know.
Project 2025 proposes breaking up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the parent agency for the National Weather Service, describing it as one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.
By Scott Dance
July 22, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
Among the stakes in the upcoming U.S. elections: Weather forecasts, who delivers them and what they say about links between extreme conditions and climate change.
A conservative proposal drafted by the Heritage Foundations Project 2025 has ignited an intense debate this month by proposing that a Republican administration privatize weather forecasting now done by government agencies. The plan would break up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the parent agency for the National Weather Service, describing it as one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry. Meanwhile, a separate Republican proposal introduced in the House last year calls for transforming NOAA into an independent agency akin to NASA, a plan critics say could expose it to political influence.
Even as Donald Trumps campaign has said it had no part in Project 2025, its widely seen as a blueprint for a possible second Trump administration. Private weather companies have not endorsed the calls for commercializing Weather Service data. Still, as the prospects of a second Trump presidency rise, meteorologists and climate scientists are voicing concern over what these proposals would mean for the millions of people they are working to inform and protect.
During Trumps term, scientists said they were sidelined, muted or forced out by the hundreds and raised concerns that the administration misrepresented their research on the coronavirus and reproduction as well as on hurricane forecasting, environmental advocates said.
{snip}
By Scott Dance
Scott Dance is a reporter for The Washington Post covering extreme weather news and the intersections between weather, climate, society and the environment. He joined The Post in 2022 after more than a decade at the Baltimore Sun. Twitter
Project 2025 proposes breaking up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the parent agency for the National Weather Service, describing it as one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.
By Scott Dance
July 22, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
Among the stakes in the upcoming U.S. elections: Weather forecasts, who delivers them and what they say about links between extreme conditions and climate change.
A conservative proposal drafted by the Heritage Foundations Project 2025 has ignited an intense debate this month by proposing that a Republican administration privatize weather forecasting now done by government agencies. The plan would break up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the parent agency for the National Weather Service, describing it as one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry. Meanwhile, a separate Republican proposal introduced in the House last year calls for transforming NOAA into an independent agency akin to NASA, a plan critics say could expose it to political influence.
Even as Donald Trumps campaign has said it had no part in Project 2025, its widely seen as a blueprint for a possible second Trump administration. Private weather companies have not endorsed the calls for commercializing Weather Service data. Still, as the prospects of a second Trump presidency rise, meteorologists and climate scientists are voicing concern over what these proposals would mean for the millions of people they are working to inform and protect.
During Trumps term, scientists said they were sidelined, muted or forced out by the hundreds and raised concerns that the administration misrepresented their research on the coronavirus and reproduction as well as on hurricane forecasting, environmental advocates said.
{snip}
By Scott Dance
Scott Dance is a reporter for The Washington Post covering extreme weather news and the intersections between weather, climate, society and the environment. He joined The Post in 2022 after more than a decade at the Baltimore Sun. Twitter
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 398 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would Trump privatize weather forecasting? What to know. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2024
OP
tanyev
(44,570 posts)1. The Sharpie Weather Service?
MyMission
(2,000 posts)2. I've heard the corporate world hires the top meteorologists
And the rest are on TV giving flawed forecasts.
That was a generalization, and an attempt at humor.
But it's partly true. And many good ones work for the government, part of the national weather service. So privatize that and generate all kinds of income and grift, while controlling the narrative? Rethugs are anti science but pro any business opportunity, also chaos agents.
The major corporations already rely on weather forecasts to control power and fuel supplies and prices, as well as production and marketing items needed when the weather is extreme.