Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 05:22 PM Apr 2012

I had my first post hidden today on DU3.

Apparently, the "natural medicine" crowd thinks it's "misleading" to call it "natural medicine" when the source of said medicine is an illegally obtained human penis.

"Poster equates human castration with naturopathic medicine, unconnected to the article, which is about a crazy man cutting someone's dick off."

(warning- Graphic images at link):
http://www.thezimbabwemail.com/world/11221-police-arrest-man-selling-freshly-cut-penis.html

Sigh.

I really wish the woo-woos would keep a more open mind.

Crazy man cutting someone's dick off.... crazy man cutting a rhinoceros's horn off... crazy man diluting something past the point where it doesn't exist anymore... I don't see the difference.

But, apparently they found a jury that does.


AUTOMATED MESSAGE: One of your posts has been hidden by a DU Jury

Mail Message
At Sat Apr 14, 2012, 10:53 AM, an alert was sent on the following post:

Police arrest man selling naturopathic medicine

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Poster equates human castration with naturopathic medicine, unconnected to the article, which is about a crazy man cutting someone's dick off.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Apr 14, 2012, 11:03 AM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Flame bait. Ian why be an unsevered dick?
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Giving the OP the benefit of the doubt.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: I was genuinely conflicted about what to do here. I went with 'hide it' on the grounds that it is not appropriate for the Health forum. Belongs in the Lounge, maybe with a 'weird news' tag or something.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Gack. And also, GACK. The low-voltage headline is appropriate, and the content disgusting. But not deserving of censorship.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DECISION

You will no longer be able to participate in this discussion thread, and you will not be able to start a new discussion thread in this forum until 12:03 PM. This hidden post has been added to your <a href="/?com=profile&uid=159108&sub=trans">Transparency page</a>.




12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
2. Thanks, I thought so too. Now, I have to behave myself for at least 90 days.
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 05:57 PM
Apr 2012

Especially if I have any hopes of getting back on the MIRT Team again.

Woo-woos have no sense of humor... or irony... or reality.

Although, to be fair, it could have been a fellow skeptic with a stick up his butt that alerted on it, but I doubt it.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
3. It could be worse...
Sat Apr 14, 2012, 07:28 PM
Apr 2012

I had three posts hidden in the first couple weeks of DU3:

-The first for asking someone of they were being deliberately obtuse.
-The second for quoting the snarky punchline from an xkcd.
-The third for suggesting an organized protest.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
7. I dunno...
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 04:15 PM
Apr 2012

I've served on a dozen or so juries and I have never voted to hide a post, but I'm not sure how I would have voted on this one.

I share your opinion of naturopathy, but it's hard to deny that your headline was rather misleading. He was presumably arrested for depriving the victim of his John Thomas rather than the selling of it as medicine.


MineralMan

(147,574 posts)
9. Well, I understood it perfectly well.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 07:26 PM
Apr 2012

I guess random DUers aren't familiar with this particular group. Either that, or the word "penis" scares them. I'm never sure.

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
10. PENIS!!! PeEeeeeeeeeNIS! PENIS! PENIS! PENIS! PENISPENISPENISPENISPENISPEeeEeeeeeEEEEeeNisssSSs! n/t
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:08 AM
Apr 2012

MineralMan

(147,574 posts)
11. Funny! I remember when the word first
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:11 AM
Apr 2012

became acceptable for TV nooz people to use. There was a rash (no pun intended) of penis stories for a short time. I can't remember what story it was that opened the door and let the TV nooz folks say "penis," though. It was either the speculation about the curvature of Clinton's member or some angry woman's penis removal story. I just remember all those nooz folks saying it a lot for a while.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»I had my first post hidde...