Isn't That A Balloon? Deflating a DoD UFO Video

[sl8]

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2023/10/24/isnt-that-a-balloon-deflating-a-dod-ufo-video/

Isn’t That A Balloon? Deflating a DoD UFO Video

October 24, 2023

On July 12, 2022, a US military drone captured video of a metallic, spherical orb flying over the Middle East. The US Department of Defense says it was an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP), the term the US government prefers over unidentified flying object (UFO).

US Department of Defense (DoD) official Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, who leads the US government’s investigation into UAPs at the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), described the footage at a public briefing held by NASA in June 2023.

[...]

A closer look at the July 2022 footage of the UAP suggests a more banal explanation.

It may just be a balloon.

[...]

[SpamWyzer]

1. The argument

from parallax view is fascinating. I had not considered this. Sometimes I forget that we can be brilliant thinkers.

[Archae]

2. To the FTB's it doesn't matter.

They are convinced it was an alien spaceship.

And absolutely none of the actual *GASP* evidence will make them admit that the object is just a balloon.

[Wonder Why]

3. What tipped off the researchers were the mickey mouse face on it and the ears.

The government thought there was an alien staring out through the porthole.

[Eko]

4. So what if it was a balloon?

That doesn’t make it so that it couldn’t be an alien balloon.

[progressoid]

5. Exactly!

The aliens are great at hiding in plain sight. They can easily disguise their spaceship as a balloon.
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!!11!!

[PoindexterOglethorpe]

6. The problem lies in assuming that something you can't

immediately identify MUST be some kind of alien construct.

My Son The Astronomer tells me that the consensus in astronomy is that we may very well be the first intelligent, technological civilization in the galaxy.

Forget that there are around 100 billion stars in our galaxy, the Milky Way. Some 70% of them are red dwarfs. Which isn't to say that planets around a red dwarf star can't have life, even intelligent life, but it does suggest that such life would be quite different from what we have here.

In addition, some significant percentage of stars are closer to the center of the galaxy, where radiation is a huge issue and would probably keep life from developing.

There's also good reason to believe that not only does a planet need to be the right size, in the Goldilocks Zone, but a decent sized moon may also be crucial.

My Son The Astronomer does exo-planet research. At this point, we can't quite find Earth-sized planets in the Goldilocks Zone. Eventually, we will, because the technology constantly advances.

Oh, something else about interstellar travel. There's A LOT of radiation out there, not simply when you get outside the atmosphere, but much, much more outside the solar system itself. And the faster you travel, the more quickly you are exposed to all that radiation. It's possible that we could develop materials that would effectively shield astronauts from that radiation. But, maybe not.

Oh, and our current fastest rockets cannot travel a measurable percent of the speed of light (c). So rocket technology is another problem. Yes, we are always advancing, and developing a propulsion system that might allow us to travel at 50% of c would be impressive. But the nearest star would still be eight years away.

The problems go on and on.

I read a lot of science fiction, and I love stories that involve FTL (faster than light) travel. I especially enjoy the two series by Jack McDevitt in which humans have happily occupied much of the galaxy on Earth-like planets. The sad reality is that there are probably not very many such Earth-like planets out there.