Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you all enjoying the Randi thread in GD? (Original Post) edhopper Dec 2014 OP
Yeah, and I noticed the "sources" used... Archae Dec 2014 #1
It also reeks of homophobia. zappaman Jan 2015 #8
I stopped reading at "Sheldrake". Ron Obvious Dec 2014 #2
How you know Randi is correct: AlbertCat Dec 2014 #3
If you every read any of the stories edhopper Dec 2014 #4
Definitely hilarious. trotsky Dec 2014 #5
This was my post about the mindset of the Randi detractors edhopper Dec 2014 #6
In Randi's book "Flim Flam" Archae Dec 2014 #7
Enjoying isn't the word... LeftishBrit Jan 2015 #9

Archae

(46,798 posts)
1. Yeah, and I noticed the "sources" used...
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 08:45 AM
Dec 2014

A hack job from a dubious "newspaper," and a blog run by a conspiracy theorist who is a vicious anti-Semite.

The original post reminds me of something from a fictional character, Frank Burns from "MASH."

He saw some Koreans burying a kimchee pot, while he "tested" his toothpaste for explosives.
In his eyes, they were burying a bomb.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
3. How you know Randi is correct:
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:37 AM
Dec 2014

You get the same kind of complaints (actually the same complaints exactly!...over and over) from the likes of Sheldrake AND Sylvia Brown.... and Uri Geller...and.... and


They are all knit-picky-esque "he wasn't nice to me" and "he lied about (usually something he never said)!!!!"


It, of course, is not up to Randi to prove others' extraordinary claims. When said claims are debunked.... attacking the debunker is a sure sign he is on to something!

edhopper

(34,775 posts)
4. If you every read any of the stories
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 10:40 AM
Dec 2014

about the people who try for the $1,000,000 challenge and their complaints when they fail, it is enlightening and funny.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
5. Definitely hilarious.
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 11:04 AM
Dec 2014

They all agree to the terms of the test beforehand, so when they fall short the excuses start. Generally culminating in accusing Randi of cheating, etc. Or hell, just fabricate a quote out of thin air that he endorses genocide. Doesn't matter that it's utterly false, once you've established that James Randi is a horrible, terrible person to expect people who make promises to actually deliver on them.

edhopper

(34,775 posts)
6. This was my post about the mindset of the Randi detractors
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 11:12 AM
Dec 2014

"People who spend their time looking for Bigfoot, UFOs, Ghosts or ESP are harmless folks enjoying a personal pursuit. No matter how irrational or imaginary these things are.

People who spend their time showing how these things aren't real and debunking the claims are mean spirited and full of hate who should find better uses of their time.

Even though the subjects are the same, Bigfoot, UFOs, etc...it is only acceptable if the people involved are believers."


Of course there are also those that are enraged that he has shown their favorite woo is bull crap.

Archae

(46,798 posts)
7. In Randi's book "Flim Flam"
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 12:23 PM
Dec 2014

Randi details how he debunked a playing-card reader that invokes religion and starving kids to try to excuse her failure, another "psychic" that claimed to "see through a blindfold," and a number of Italian fakes.
The funniest one was the "mummifier," he claimed to "mummify" food, but failed completely.

LeftishBrit

(41,303 posts)
9. Enjoying isn't the word...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:34 PM
Jan 2015

it makes me depressed and angry. Especially when the anti-Semitic scumbag Christopher Bollyn gets quoted as a serious source.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Are you all enjoying the ...