Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumNeil deGrasse Tyson's "pronouncements" on religion...
...
ANY claim that NdGT enjoys making "pronouncements" on religion is at best ignorant and uniformed, and at worst deliberately misrepresenting the truth, and without...a...shred...of...credibility.
Start at the ~34:00 mark for relevant conversation from the man himself.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neil deGrasse Tyson's "pronouncements" on religion... (Original Post)
NeoGreen
Jan 2018
OP
Permanut
(6,708 posts)1. Thanks for posting this, NeoGreen..
He's a star. Not sure if he's in the main sequence though.
NeoGreen
(4,033 posts)2. Either way...
...he shines and is worth watching.
Hop David
(26 posts)3. Here's a Tyson pronouncement
"When you start basking in the glory of God ... you're kind of no good any more]"
He's saying this of Isaac Newton of all people.
Supposedly Newton could have easily done n-body perturbation theory in an afternoon. It would have been crumbs for Newton, after all -- he invented calculus in two months! Why didn't he? Because he was content with the explanation that God intervened and kept the solar system stable.
A lot wrong with Tyson's story.
1) Newton did make substantial efforts to model n-body systems. So Tyson's claim that it would have been easy for him is demonstrably false from the get go.
2) Other great mathematicians tried. After Newton made his attempt Euler took a crack at it. Then Lagrange. More than a hundred years later Laplace built a satisfactory model. But he built on the efforts of Newton, Euler and Lagrange.
3) Newton did not singlehandedly invent calculus in two months. Fermat, Cavalieri, Barrow, Descartes and others had laid the foundations in the generation before Newton.
The history of Hamid al Ghazali is another fiction Tyson delivers to support a rant against religion.
----
Tyson will chide Dawkins for being too caustic. He will distance himself from the more vocal atheists and say he doesn't care what people believe.
Then he turns around and invents histories to bash religion.
Dawkins may be brash but his stuff is accurate (so far as I know). On the other hand Tyson bears false witness in a warm, friendly voice.
Iggo
(48,463 posts)5. Welcome to DU.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)4. "deliberately misrepresenting the truth, and without...a...shred...of...credibility."
Yep. Par for the course with a certain few.
Response to NeoGreen (Original post)
Freelancer This message was self-deleted by its author.