Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,033 posts)
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 07:37 AM Jul 2017

Go Ahead and Embrace the Word Atheist (Even If You Prefer a Different Label)

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2017/07/30/go-ahead-and-embrace-the-word-atheist-even-if-you-prefer-a-different-label/




Go Ahead and Embrace the Word “Atheist” (Even If You Prefer a Different Label)
July 30, 2017 by Hemant Mehta

Should you use the word “atheist” to describe yourself even if “Humanist” describes you more thoroughly or “Agnostic” seems more philosophically honest?

David Silverman, President of American Atheists, (obviously) says yes. But it’s not just for self-serving reasons.

YouTuber Alex J. O’Connor (a.k.a. CosmicSkeptic) recently met Silverman and describes the conversation they had on this very topic. He also talks about how Silverman managed to convince him that the “atheist” label should be embraced even if people who fit the description would rather use another term.



There are no doubt atheists who believe the word carries too much stigma or who feel we shouldn’t have to use the word at all (since it’s not like we have a-unicornists). This video rebuts those points and more.

I love the point at the end: “Call yourself an atheist today, so you won’t have to tomorrow.”


For my part, I prefer Realist as opposed to Atheist, primarily due to the word Atheist being dependent on existence of the theist point of view, the ambiguity of just which deity(ies) is/are being discounted (everyone is an Atheist, since no-one believes in all the gods, past present or future) and the negative connotation and subtext as derived from the "A" theism.

However, I agree that from an umbrella marketing/popularization point of view, the word has value when embraced.

Oh, and another reason I don't like the word Atheism...that whole i before e / e before i difficulty (you know, spelling).
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go Ahead and Embrace the Word Atheist (Even If You Prefer a Different Label) (Original Post) NeoGreen Jul 2017 OP
You've a good point! Duppers Jul 2017 #1
I absolutely embrace the word. aka-chmeee Jul 2017 #2

Duppers

(28,260 posts)
1. You've a good point!
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 08:32 AM
Jul 2017

The word Atheist is "dependent on existence of the theist point of view," thereby, in a sense, seceding ground.

However, most theists will not have a clue what the term Realist means. I often just like saying I'm an atheist as a way to say, "I think you're wrong." It's convenient for ending pushy religious conversations.


aka-chmeee

(1,177 posts)
2. I absolutely embrace the word.
Mon Jul 31, 2017, 10:41 AM
Jul 2017

Realist is great, and accurate; except many if not most religious consider themselves realists. Atheist then, to me, makes it clear in which regard you are a realist.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Go Ahead and Embrace the ...