Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoGreen

(4,033 posts)
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 12:03 PM Jun 2017

Christian Author Pines For Days When Religious Leaders Got To Boss Hollywood Around

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2017/06/23/christian-author-pines-for-days-when-religious-leaders-got-to-boss-hollywood-around/




Christian Author Pines For Days When Religious Leaders Got To Boss Hollywood Around
June 23, 2017 by Robyn Pennacchia

Christian author Jerry Newcombe is not happy with Hollywood these days, specifically with how it’s ignoring flyover country. He longs for the “good old days” when the Motion Picture Production Code (usually referred to as the Hays Code, after Will H. Hays, president of the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America) allowed church leaders to have more of a say in what ought to be allowed in movies.

(snip)

For the unhep, the Hays Code was a set of guidelines “voluntarily” (i.e.: Not enforced by the government) adopted by the motion picture industry in order to avoid pictures getting banned in various states with strict “moral decency” laws, and, yes, in response to groups like American Roman Catholics harping on about immorality in films.

It didn’t just ban swearing. It didn’t just ban sex. It banned gay people (“any inference of sex perversion”), it banned mocking the clergy and Betty Boop’s flapper outfit. It banned sympathy for criminals or justification of crimes or people getting away with crimes. It was also incredibly racist! The code literally banned interracial romances — likely for the same reasons Bob Jones University banned interracial dating until 2000. The first “loosening” of that part of the code was the 1949 movie Pinky in which a white actress playing a black woman who was “passing” as white had a relationship with a white man.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Christian Author Pines For Days When Religious Leaders Got To Boss Hollywood Around (Original Post) NeoGreen Jun 2017 OP
"Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn." SCantiGOP Jun 2017 #1
LOL trotsky Jun 2017 #2
A lot of movies during the Hays Office Reign of Error were damned good Warpy Jun 2017 #3

SCantiGOP

(14,299 posts)
1. "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 12:32 PM
Jun 2017

Was considered extremely risque when it closed out Gone With the Wind in the 30s. It was only because of the scope of the movie and the director and producer that it was allowed.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. LOL
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 01:07 PM
Jun 2017

And these same people will rant about Sharia Law, which oddly enough would mesh quite happily with their censorship requirements.

Warpy

(113,131 posts)
3. A lot of movies during the Hays Office Reign of Error were damned good
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 01:12 PM
Jun 2017

since it took truly great screenwriters to talk around some of the sillier restrictions, like the twin beds for actors who were not married to each other but were playing married characters who still liked each other.

If religious bullies were focused on egregious violence instead of normal sexuality, I might be all for it, violent movies wherein the characters communicate with screams and grunts bore the shit out of me. Unfortunately, all they care about is pretending that sex between consenting adults doesn't really exist and if any is found, it should be punished.

While I'd love to see something jar Hollywood out of its comic book obsession, religious sexual prudery is unlikely to do it. I do wish something would get through to conspicuous Christians that freedom of religion is not the same as freedom to bully everyone around them. I don't want to go back to the doublethink that said it was fine to simulate chopping a woman up and flushing the parts down a toilet but calling it a toilet was banned.

Yes, it was just that silly.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Christian Author Pines Fo...