Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumOfficial Atheist and Agnostic group presidential primary poll
Who are you supporting and who is the best candidate for non-believers?
29 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Bernie Sanders | |
29 (100%) |
|
Hillary Clinton | |
0 (0%) |
|
Other | |
0 (0%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Warpy
(113,131 posts)but Hillary Clinton has been a member.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fellowship_%28Christian_organization%29
Cartoonist
(7,557 posts)If that was the only thing. It's all that other stuff I don't like.
Warpy
(113,131 posts)but you have to admit her membership in The Family puts her into the "creepy" zone.
I guess i'm having a hard time that so many people can't see it.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Yes, her "Family" ties I imagine are for power reasons. The Family seems so "guy" oriented.... like the Scottish Rite Temple or something. I don't thinks she holds their dogma dear. And saying The Bible was her favorite book clearly shows me that The Bible is not her favorite book.
All this behavior, however, is within keeping of the general reasons I prefer Sanders.
RussBLib
(9,693 posts)But in my case, both answers are the same.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)But I suspected that it wouldn't matter.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In the unlikely event of a Republican nominee (for President or for any other office) who was openly non-religious, I'd almost certainly back a religious Democrat.
The LDS Church is one of the most conservative denominations, but I'd support Harry Reid against a typical Republican, regardless of the latter's religious views.
mr blur
(7,753 posts)if you asked me who I thought was least likely to involve the rest of us in another disgusting war and then lie about it I'd go with majority here.
Besides, any 'Left' politician who is a bedfellow of Henry Kissinger is not someone I'd squander a vote on.
deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)I did not expect that.
PassingFair
(22,437 posts)Are we a VOTING BLOCK or what!!!😀😀😀
PassingFair
(22,437 posts).... For my favorite voting bloc!
NeoGreen
(4,033 posts)...
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's really refreshing to finally have a candidate in the race who doesn't pander to bible thumpers!
January 9, 2016
by: Michael Stone
Rejecting the Republican dream of a Christian theocracy, Bernie Sanders tells supporters it is dangerous for governments to get deeply involved with religion.
Justin Scott, an Iowan who takes his politics seriously, asked the Democratic presidential candidate for his thoughts on politicians who base a lot of their legislation on their religious beliefs at a recent campaign event in Iowa.
Sanders answered:
Religious freedom in this country is part of our Constitution, and all of us agree with that. And you have many different religions, and people have the right, in this country, to practice the religion that they believe in.
But we also have a separation between religion and state. We know how dangerous it is, historically, for governments to get deeply involved with religion Lets not confuse and merge religion and state. That is not what our Founding Fathers wanted, and they were right.
Sanders is right. The attempt by todays Republican party to confuse and merge religion and state is dangerous, un-American, and a repudiation of the secular values upon which this nation was founded.
This is not the first time the progressive candidate has championed secular values. Earlier this year, in an uplifting viral video supporting Sanders 2016 presidential campaign, the presidential hopeful declared:
The problems we face did not come down from the heavens. They are made, they are made by bad human decisions, and good human decisions can change them.
***
Sanders is a friend to freethinkers, and the enemy of conservative Christians. Religious News Service describes Sanders as unabashedly irreligious and the anti-Bible thumper, noting:
Sanders is the presidential contender most willing to dissociate himself from religion. Though he identifies as Jewish and by Jewish law is Jewish, he has freely acknowledged that he is not a religious person. He scored a solid zero from Ralph Reeds Faith and Freedom Coalition in its most recent scorecard and a 100 from the abortion rights group NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Scoring a zero from Ralph Reeds Faith and Freedom Coalition is a badge of honor, and should be a ringing endorsement to the ears of every humanist, every atheist, every freethinker.
More: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2016/01/bernie-sanders-rejects-theocracy-defends-church-state-separation/#sthash.c7iYfb7W.dpuf
progressoid
(50,784 posts)it was also refreshing to hear someone end a speech without saying "God Bless America".
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He's the real deal, a little angry and a little loud but that's why we love him!
So glad you and your daughter got to see him!
progressoid
(50,784 posts)Standing room only
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Honestly when he joined the race last year I never thought he stood a chance, an underdog that most had never heard of from a small state that might as well be in Canada.
His rock star status continues to amaze me.