Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 01:30 PM Aug 2015

This Week in God (Maddow blog)

First up from the God Machine this week is an extraordinary exchange about the Bible with the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination.


Donald Trump’s clumsiness on matters of faith has been a point of concern for some voters before, but this week, the GOP candidate sat down with Bloomberg Politics, which noted that Trump has repeatedly pointed to the Bible lately as his favorite book. Does he have a favorite scriptural verse or two he’d be willing to share?

“Well, I wouldn’t want to get into it because to me that’s very personal,” Trump replied. “You know, when I talk about the Bible it’s very personal.” Asked to cite a verse from the Bible he simply likes, the Republican responded, “No, I don’t want to do that.”

When John Heilemann asked if he preferred the Old Testament or the New Testament, Trump responded, in all seriousness, “Uh, probably [long pause] equal. I think it’s just an incredible, the whole Bible is an incredible, I joke, very much so, they always hold up The Art of the Deal, I say it’s my second favorite book of all time. But, uh, I just think the Bible is just something very special.”


(the link)

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/week-god-82915?cid=sm_fb_maddow

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Week in God (Maddow blog) (Original Post) AlbertCat Aug 2015 OP
reminds one of Sarah Palin, doesn't it? Brainstormy Aug 2015 #1
Wasn't Jesus a loser? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #2
Not a fair comparison. bvf Aug 2015 #3
Lol! Eggsackally! beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #4
and now his church said he's not an active member RussBLib Aug 2015 #5
but Trump is leading among evangelicals! AlbertCat Aug 2015 #6
I imagine them looking at their watches uriel1972 Aug 2015 #7
I dunno, people have been claiming religion is a personal thing Lordquinton Aug 2015 #8
here's one for next week - up to 400 church leaders expected to resign RussBLib Aug 2015 #9
You don't say? bvf Aug 2015 #10
Many A-M women, like God, did not exist. onager Aug 2015 #11

Brainstormy

(2,433 posts)
1. reminds one of Sarah Palin, doesn't it?
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 04:45 PM
Aug 2015

You can no more pick one bible verse than you can pick one magazine or newspaper. Of course they read all of them.

The word salad is reminiscent, too.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
3. Not a fair comparison.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:22 PM
Aug 2015

Trump specifically said, "I like people who weren't captured."

Wait a minute...

RussBLib

(9,693 posts)
5. and now his church said he's not an active member
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:47 PM
Aug 2015

he's probably lying about going to church there, he's likely never read the Bible and he doesn't have a clue about the Old or New Testaments, but Trump is leading among evangelicals!

Marble Collegiate Church was founded in 1628 and is one of the oldest continuous Protestant denominations in the country. The church is part of the Reformed Church in America denomination and is on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.

"Donald Trump has had a longstanding history with Marble Collegiate Church, where his parents were for years active members and one of his children was baptized. However, as he indicates, he is a Presbyterian, and is not an active member of Marble," the statement said.


Original. What a bullshitter this guy is! I can't help but think the whole thing will come crashing down. Hopefully Trump does before the country does.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
6. but Trump is leading among evangelicals!
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:53 AM
Aug 2015

Well, duh!


They are evangelicals, after all....

They haven't gotten anything right in 2000 years.

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
7. I imagine them looking at their watches
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 10:27 AM
Aug 2015

Waiting at the Jesus bus-stop for many, many years to come.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
8. I dunno, people have been claiming religion is a personal thing
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:31 PM
Aug 2015

Here for a long time, he says it's personal and doesn't want to get into it, shouldn't that be praised? He is doing something right, after all.

RussBLib

(9,693 posts)
9. here's one for next week - up to 400 church leaders expected to resign
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 10:44 PM
Aug 2015

hahahahahahaha - tell me about your moral superiority to atheists again?


Experts report as many as 400 pastors, deacons, elders and church staff members will resign this Sunday after their names surfaced on the list of users revealed in the Ashley Madison hack.

Writing for Christianity Today, Ed Stetzer, the executive director of LifeWay Research, and a well-regarded expert on church leadership, reports:

Based on my conversations with leaders from several denominations in the U.S. and Canada, I estimate that at least 400 church leaders (pastors, elders, staff, deacons, etc.) will be resigning Sunday. This is a significant moment of embarrassment for the church—and it should be.

The fallout from the Ashley Madison hack has been troubling for many users, particularly religious conservatives.

Family values advocate and serial child molester Josh Duggar was but one high-profile conservative Christian exposed as a user of the infamous website for individuals interested in arranging extramarital affairs.

In addition to Duggar, another high profile conservative Christian caught in the Ashley Madison storm was Christian YouTube star Sam Rader.

- See more at: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/08/400-church-leaders-expected-to-resign-after-ashley-madison-hack/#sthash.HgfedThw.dpuf

So they want to keep their wives, but not let them have any of the fun! Bastards.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
10. You don't say?
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 07:10 AM
Aug 2015

It'll be interesting to see if this gets any traction. I hope it does. With names and affiliation info (although that might be too much to expect).

onager

(9,356 posts)
11. Many A-M women, like God, did not exist.
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 07:50 AM
Aug 2015

I'm still waiting for an update on the 400 who got caught.

Who were mostly trying to communicate with non-existent women, it turns out.

Annalee Newitz at Gizmodo downloaded the entire hacked database and analyzed it

Almost None of the Women in the Ashley Madison Database Ever Used the Site

What I discovered was that the world of Ashley Madison was a far more dystopian place than anyone had realized. This isn’t a debauched wonderland of men cheating on their wives. It isn’t even a sadscape of 31 million men competing to attract those 5.5 million women in the database. Instead, it’s like a science fictional future where every woman on Earth is dead, and some Dilbert-like engineer has replaced them with badly-designed robots.

Those millions of Ashley Madison men were paying to hook up with women who appeared to have created profiles and then simply disappeared. Were they cobbled together by bots and bored admins, or just user debris?

Whatever the answer, the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison.


http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»This Week in God (Maddow ...