Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumHey Frank...
...simple answer: you are an atheist for 1 god too few.
Frank Schaeffer (born August 3, 1952) is an American author, film director, screenwriter and public speaker. He is the son of the late theologian and author Francis Schaeffer. He became a Hollywood film director and author, writing several internationally acclaimed novels depicting life in a strict evangelical household including Portofino, Zermatt, and Saving Grandma.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Schaeffer
or you don't quiet understand the concept behind the word Atheist.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)How do you screw up that badly?
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)to be an atheist. Wow, I hope so. All of my life I have been in and out of being cool, depending on how the rest of the world goes. I just stay the same. But I like it when my personal style or beliefs move into the mainstream.
Frank is an idiot. There is no possible way to be an atheist AND believe in God, any god. This is the kind of person you just want to smack upside the head!
muriel_volestrangler
(102,666 posts)judging by the interview in this OP from last year: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218130224
"I'd like to change the debate on religion, actually I'd like to finish off BOTH the New Atheist movement and the religious fundamentalists! I think by introducing a note of paradox both sets of absolutists can be vanquished. After all this is supposed to be the post-modern age. Certainty is so has been!
Who is the audience for this book? Christians? Atheists?
All of the above, especially people burnt out on both religion and the hubris of some atheists."
xkcd expressed an eternal truth there.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I do think that his audience is the Christians, who want to believe that all atheists really do believe in God. I have been told that more times than I can count.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It will sell well with religious audiences desperate for any weakness in the atheistic worldview and his job is to sell his books.
He's not stupid. He knows better.
But he's also a raging asshole for the way he complains about atheists who are, in reality, just trying to shore up the firewall between church and state. He's handing the religious ammo to use against atheists. For that he's a dick.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,666 posts)and I have no idea what the standard of the books is. Has he ever done something that shows he knows better? All I've seen from him is that interview, and he doesn't seem clever or knowledgeable in that.
DetlefK
(16,485 posts)Modern Satanism is basically just a non-religious humanism, but the name pisses off Christians.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)to piss off the Christians (and I am sure that this would do it), calling myself a Satanist means that I believe in the same shit that they do, only in reverse. Tempting though.
DetlefK
(16,485 posts)The old kind is theistic and worships daemons and stuff. The new kind is an atheistic movement that specifically taunts Christians.
onager
(9,356 posts)Checked him out on IMdB. Schaeffer has exactly ONE official credit as a screenwriter. The same movie where he also worked as an actor, editor and director.
That was his 1986 magnum dopus "Wired To Kill." Plot summary:
(For a great movie in the Modified-Wheelchair genre, check out "FDR: American Badass." Featuring President Roosevelt using his armed wheelchair to chase Nazi werewolves. No, I'm not making that up. Great movie!)
Schaeffer has a Director credit on 3 other movies:
1992 Baby on Board
1989 Rising Storm
1988 Headhunter
So he hasn't directed a movie since 1992 or written one that got produced since 1986. Here's his complete bio and list of movie/TV work:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0769704/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
Schaeffer did appear, as a talking head, in the excellent 2013 documentary "American Jesus." That one's definitely worth watching.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I knew it!
Every time is see "Director, screenwriter, producer, actor, editor..." it probably also includes wardrobe, set dressing, casting, locations, PD, art direction....
Because it's a movie he made himself. (because no one else would touch it)
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Let me know when he's been a hip-hop producer.
Then I might take him seriously as a theologian.
onager
(9,356 posts)At least Ed's movies were funny (however unintentionally) and entertaining, if only in their sheer awfulness.