Anthropology
Related: About this forumRamsgate archaeologist discovers 3000 year old Bronze Age toddler's shoe - possibly oldest found in
Ramsgate archaeologist discovers 3000 year old Bronze Age toddlers shoe possibly oldest found in country and smallest in world
February 21, 2023 Kathy Bailes
Archaeologist Steve Tomlinson, from Ramsgate, was mudlarking with friend Emily Brown last September when he discovered a 3,000-year-old, late Bronze Age toddlers shoe in north Kent. The shoe is potentially the oldest found in the British Isles, and also thought to be the smallest Bronze Age shoe found in the world.
Steve explains the extremely rare find and its huge importance:
It was a sunny and clear day on 17th September 2022 when I made a visit to North Kent to go Mudlarking. Mudlarking is a term coined from the 18th and 19th centuries where people would descend on the foreshore rivers, mainly the river Thames, in the mud, looking for items of value in the hope it would make them a livelihood to survive. Nowadays mudlarks look for items of historical importance in the hope to fill the gaps of history.
On that day I was in the company of Emily Brown, a professional archaeologist and a very good friend of mine, to check out an area she had not visited before. The day started well, and between us we had a good selection of finds including plenty of pottery sherds from the Roman period, and various small objects like a small piece of Roman tesserae. We had been out for 3 hours scouring the shoreline, and the tide was turning when we hit the last leg of our day. As we made our way along the foreshore, nothing would prepare me for what I was about to stumble upon when I came across what looked like a very old shoe like piece of leather washed up on the mud/shingle, it was around 15 centimetres in length.
I picked it up and I immediately thought it looks like the sole of an old little shoe, I showed it to Emily, and we made a few guesses to its age. Could it be modern? (I doubt it), Could it be Viking (doubt it) Could it be early medieval? (More likely), on further inspections the latter looked very much the case, I was sure I had come across part of a one-piece leather constructed shoe a typical type design popular within the early medieval period something like a turnshoe, but these types of shoes were also known within the Prehistoric period (so who knows). In 2018 I found an Anglo-Saxon shoe sticking out of the mud dating to 942-969AD (after carbon dating), over 1,000 years old so I knew this could be something quite special.
More:
https://theisleofthanetnews.com/2023/02/21/birchington-archaeologist-discovers-3000-year-old-bronze-age-toddlers-shoe-possibly-oldest-found-in-country-and-smallest-unearthed-in-world/
Easterncedar
(3,546 posts)Just imagining the 3,000 years rolling by, tides going in and out, while that shoe waited to be found, blows my mind. Thanks as always, Judi Lynn, for starting my day with something interesting to get my mind going.
samnsara
(18,282 posts)..if you get a chance to watch The Detectorists its pretty amusing.
The Blue Flower
(5,637 posts)I started watching and binged the whole series.
rampartc
(5,835 posts)but by actually explaining "mudlarking" this one reaches a new pinnacle of journalistic excellence.
3Hotdogs
(13,421 posts)"You lose one more shoe, I ain't buying you no more. You do without."
Warpy
(113,130 posts)but leather sandals weren't super expensive. Expensive items were metal items since it took a lot of time and energy to produce them. A good cobbler could probably knock off a child's sandal in an hour or two, probably using rawhide since durability wasn't a factor in a child who was growing like a weed.
And I'll bet a major reason this kid lost a shoe is that his/her mother insisted on buying a much bigger size than s/he needed. It's what my mother always did to me, the shoes finally fitting properly when they were completely worn out.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,769 posts)At least it probably wasn't a tar pit.
Sancho
(9,103 posts)burrowowl
(18,029 posts)niyad
(120,061 posts)thatcrowwoman
(1,230 posts)Many thanks.
Off to join the Anthropology group now.
🕊thatcrowwoman
wnylib
(24,454 posts)I'm surprised that the shoe didn't get washed out to sea.
Now I'm wondering what I might find by looking at creek beds. (Too far inland for checking out ocean shores) So far, all I've ever found are fossils in rocks which are not unique around here - trilobytes, oodles of them.