Science
Related: About this forumNASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims hes discovered a "new force" that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary
NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims hes discovered a new force that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets.
Link to tweet
rampartd
(4,613 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,315 posts)Granted that we need a new way to push mass into orbit, but this sounds a bit like woo to me.
*there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
WheelWalker
(9,401 posts)Just sayin'
Stryst
(726 posts)Neither one can whistle.
yaesu
(9,319 posts)WheelWalker
(9,401 posts)dgauss
(1,528 posts)progressoid
(53,172 posts)hmmm....
NNadir
(38,030 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 30, 2026, 06:17 PM - Edit history (1)
When cold fusion was announced I asked myself how it could have been missed with all the experiments conducted involving the well known diffusion of hydrogen through palladium. Why, I asked myself, were people never killed by neutrons during these experiments?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Stanley Pons career was wrecked by putting media announcements in front of the harder routes of scientific communication.
El Supremo
(20,436 posts)
-misanthroptimist
(1,610 posts)Color me skeptical. There are several hallmarks of classic woo in that thread:
- No peer review jumps right out at me
- Experiments all done by the same group
- Implication that other scientists are against him
- Don't know what the hell the UAP stuff was supposed to be about
There's a couple more that I'd have to re-read to find. All in all, I find the claim dubious.
NNadir
(38,030 posts)The guy got a lot of "investors" rather like Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos.
These people are prime examples of making it clear that our rich people are not really "geniuses" in a meritocracy. Many of the presumed "geniuses" are cheap carny barkers who found lots of marks and got lucky (or were born with money).
(I want to throw up every time someone around me calls Musk a "genius." )
Black, now Brilliant, Light Power.
JoseBalow
(9,481 posts)snot
(11,804 posts)Notes that it's still considered unproven.