Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumBiomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years -- why?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01609-0NEWS
31 May 2024
Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years why?
Unreliable data, falsification and other issues related to misconduct are driving a growing proportion of retractions.
By Holly Else
The retraction rate for European biomedical-science papers increased fourfold between 2000 and 2021, a study of thousands of retractions has found.
Two-thirds of these papers were withdrawn for reasons relating to research misconduct, such as data and image manipulation or authorship fraud. These factors accounted for an increasing proportion of retractions over the roughly 20-year period, the analysis suggests.
Our findings indicate that research misconduct has become more prevalent in Europe over the last two decades, write the authors, led by Alberto Ruano‐Ravina, a public-health researcher at the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain.
Other research-integrity specialists point out that retractions could be on the rise because researchers and publishers are getting better at investigating and identifying potential misconduct. There are more people working to spot errors and new digital tools to screen publications for suspicious text or data.
[...]
31 May 2024
Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years why?
Unreliable data, falsification and other issues related to misconduct are driving a growing proportion of retractions.
By Holly Else
The retraction rate for European biomedical-science papers increased fourfold between 2000 and 2021, a study of thousands of retractions has found.
Two-thirds of these papers were withdrawn for reasons relating to research misconduct, such as data and image manipulation or authorship fraud. These factors accounted for an increasing proportion of retractions over the roughly 20-year period, the analysis suggests.
Our findings indicate that research misconduct has become more prevalent in Europe over the last two decades, write the authors, led by Alberto Ruano‐Ravina, a public-health researcher at the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain.
Other research-integrity specialists point out that retractions could be on the rise because researchers and publishers are getting better at investigating and identifying potential misconduct. There are more people working to spot errors and new digital tools to screen publications for suspicious text or data.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 518 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years -- why? (Original Post)
sl8
Jun 2024
OP
marble falls
(62,086 posts)1. Because of the pressure to "publish, publish, publish" to keep up reputations and draw in more research bucks ...
... to develop more products to market to consumers. A lack of peer review before publishing and the huge number of papers being published contributes 'bigly', too.
lapfog_1
(30,168 posts)2. research grants tied directly
to "big pharma" drugs and/or medical devices???
Grants that result in published skewed results that must be withdrawn later. results generally favorable to a product the companies invested big bucks developing.
erronis
(16,863 posts)3. I'm guessing that investigators from organizations such as Retraction Watch have an impact