Religion
Related: About this forumHow Islam Settled Roe v. Wade Centuries Ago
As soon as the news broke that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is trying to overturn Roe v. Wade, familiar and troubling Islamophobic tropes began to emerge in the discourse.
Americas Taliban really hates women and minorities, wrote Daily Beast editor Naveed Jamali on Twitter, harkening back to late September when dozens of commentators, including MSNBCs Rachel Maddow, started referring to Texas lawmakers as the American Taliban a trope that Muslim leaders are still trying to come back from.
Meanwhile, The Daily Shows Trevor Noah gave it his own comedic twist: All across the country, women in places like Missouri or even Texas will have the same abortion rights as women under the Taliban in Afghanistan. Think about it. We just evacuated people out of Afghanistan, and now we are going to evacuate them out of Tennessee? he quipped up until this point walking the fine line between humor and accidental Islamophobia. After all these years of the right screaming about Shariah law, it turns out they were just jealous.
Never mind the fact that this comparison is insulting to Muslims it is also blatantly false. Rather than point out the hypocrisy of the way that the far right has spent the past 20 years criticizing the Taliban for its record on womens rights only to turn around and enact its own brand of religious fundamentalism, this commentary misses the mark and lands as a lazy insult, akin to you crazies are even crazier than those brown crazies! It unwittingly drags Muslims into the so-called culture wars, hurling them into the fray of the right wings crackdown on LGBTQ and womens rights, their faith no more than an argument to prove a point.
It wouldnt be the first time that Muslims have had their faith exploited as a political pawn in bipartisan politics. Sometimes it is left-leaning Democrats who uphold them as an underrepresented minority in a sea of white supremacy, all the while refusing to take account of their faith and values that might not as cleanly line up with their agenda. Other times, it is the Christian far right that superimposes its conservative viewpoints onto them as fellow people of faith, assuming their faith-based politics will align.
Some conservatives are taking the bait. Jordan Peterson, who is openly suspicious of modern science, also conveniently believes that the truth and wisdom found in religion are the guidance that lost young men need in the world. He believes this so much that he has even defended anti-democratic, Salafi preachers. Other Muslims even some scholars have adopted the extreme far right stance that abortion is the equivalent of murder.
Ironically, these views could not be further than the actual Islamic views on abortionwhich are extremely diverse, and historically a subject of constant debate and consideration across schools of thought, from fringe Islamic jurists to the mainstays of Sunni and Shia scholarship. Often it is considered from both a religious and practical standpoint guided by the hadith (the Prophet Muhammads sayings and acts) but also informed by someones ability to give birth, and any complications that a pregnant woman might face. It is hotly debated but it is the presence of this debate and the breadth of nuance among different schools of thought that makes it so different from the polarizing forces of the U.S. culture wars that is driving the debate to the brink of absolutism.
If Muslims are going to get dragged into this particular front of Americas culture wars, it is time to set the record straight. There is no debate today in Muslim-majority countries about the permissibility of abortion when the mothers health is in jeopardy, which means that abortion remains an integral and noncontroversial part of womens health. Modern states may grapple with social and moral dilemmas when the abortion is elective, but there is a rich tradition of Islamic law to draw on that has addressed many of the questions with which the U.S. Supreme Court is grappling.
https://newlinesmag.com/essays/how-islam-settled-roe-v-wade-centuries-ago/
underpants
(186,668 posts)Very very interesting website. I bookmarked it.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,957 posts)DBoon
(23,055 posts)According to Islamic tradition and the view of the majority of Sunni Muslim scholarship life begins not at the moment of conception nor even in the first stage of development (known as the nutfa, or drop) nor with the presence of the alaqa (that which hangs) or the mudgha, which literally translates to a clump of flesh that looks like chewed skin. Rather, it is the khalqan that describes the moment that it becomes a separate creation. This is the moment that the Archangel Gabriel breathes a soul into the embryo, creating a connection with God and the universe that gives it life. According to the hadith, this moment happens at 120 days or approximately four months into the pregnancy. While Islamic scholars are known for debating scripture at length, the idea that a cluster of cells does not become a person until the soul meets the body is widely agreed upon, a rare moment of almost absolute consensus.
Based on this idea, Muslim scholars largely agree that abortion should be illegal after 120 days into the pregnancy. However, it is the debate surrounding abortion before the 120-day mark where it becomes interesting. According to the Hanafi School of thought one of the four major Sunni schools of Islamic rite and religious law abortion should be permissible so long as there is a sound reason for the abortion. In contrast to todays conservative positions, some Hanafi scholars permitted abortion without any restrictions at any point. Traditionally, reasons have often been a fear of being unable to provide for the child, such as the case with a lack of wet nurses or the presence of other children that depend on the mothers milk. Zina or sex outside of marriage also falls into this category and on the Indian subcontinent, there is a fatwa from the prominent scholar Ahmad Raza Khan that states that abortion is fine for a single mother and maybe even better given social stigma. It is also permissible in cases of rape. Meanwhile, the Shafi school didnt need a reason at all.
Hence the republican position (and the laws proposed for most red states) are far more restrictive than those in states guided by Islam.
The hard core anti-abortion position is clearly based not just on religion but on a single variant of Christianity. Abortion bans such as in Texas and Oklahoma violate the first e amendment by imposing religious-based restrictions on a medical procedure.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Also Author: It's totally not settled in Islam.
Mosby
(17,472 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Headlines are typically written by editors, not the people who write the articles.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)edhopper
(34,834 posts)Is a true disservice to the majority of Muslims.
The Talibans treatment of women deserves all the vitriol it gets.
Comparing religious extremists like the GOP and the Talaban is not an insult to anyone but the religious extremists.
I am surprised someone would come here and defend the Talaban
And let's not even look at how both groups deal with homosexuality.