Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis pushes a new theology of climate change
From the article:
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2019/09/03/pope-francis-pushes-his-climate-theology/
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Is he proposing any changes to his church's dogma that insists people cannot use birth control?
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)climate change because people cant plan for their air and water.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Climate change is truly an existential crisis.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)We should throw EVERYTHING we can at it.
That the pope's church won't even consider changing one of their teachings that has a direct impact on the environment makes him (and his church) look like incredible hypocrites.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)Because the RCC is ABUNDENTLY clear about the use of birth control and the level of sin it is (hint: it's a big one). So if the church can't convince people that using birth control will send them to hell, what does it matter what he says about climate change.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Church's rules.
You can do with that what ever you want, it won't change the facts.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)The fact that they do what they want doesn't change that it's a sin. And it doesn't change the fact that if that is your argument, then what the Pope says doesn't matter for shit. About anything. Including climate change.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Its good we all have on opinion on it.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)You and others seem to be arguing that Catholics don't listen to the Pope and do whatever they want. If I grant that what you say is true, then the point many people here are making is that it isn't important that he wants to solve climate change. Catholics may or may not listen to him.
Of course, you and I both know that the reality is that people want to say that what the Pope says is awesome when it looks (important word is "looks" because he has done NOTHING to change RCC doctrine) progressive but when he says things that are distinctly not progressive (and actually in line with RCC doctrine) like gender identity is from the devil or that it is a sin to use any contraception, then it doesn't matter what he says.
I think he's anti-progressive and not someone we should ever look up to. YMMV.
demigoddess
(6,675 posts)making abortion illegal all over the country. You can believe anything you want but you cannot practice it if it interferes with mybeliefs!
off topic, I know.
Voltaire2
(14,703 posts)Ok, so this edict on climate change is at least as meaningless as their edict on birth control.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)"Pope says people need to do what he says on birth control!"
Oh it's OK, no one listens to him on that.
"Pope says we need to address climate change!"
Everyone needs to listen to him on that!
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Seems to me you are blowing smoke up everyone's ass for your own personal needs.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)the hypocrisy of people who say we should ignore the pope when it comes to birth control, but everyone totally needs to listen to him when he speaks about climate change.
I'm sorry if that upsets you.
no.
But in contrast to many right wing theists, the Pope knows that climate change is real.
But on the subject of birth control, surveys show that many Catholics use birth control.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Many, many more would (including in developing countries where overpopulation and lack of reproductive freedom are more severe) if he lifted his church's ridiculous, outdated religious ban on it.
But he (and his church's hierarchy) are convinced this is what their god wants. They have faith, and so they can disregard facts.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)officially disapprove of.
In catholic-controlled countries, such things are simply unavailable.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The Evangelicals and Catholics are on the same team on that one. That's a huge voting bloc when you put them together.
corbettkroehler
(1,898 posts)He has been softer on family planning issues, for economic and environmental reasons, than his predecessors.
Should he take a firm stance, I would concur with what I presume to be your position that family planning must play a role in a comprehensive climate solution.
Bernie touched this issue in the CNN Climate Town Hall.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)He has given no indication whatsoever that he would.
And in fact, despite some of the speeches he's given, he has changed absolutely nothing about the RCC. All talk, no action.
corbettkroehler
(1,898 posts)http://firstpost.com/world/let-couples-not-the-church-decide-on-contraception-pope-francis-writes-in-the-joy-of-love-2719410.html
trotsky
(49,533 posts)He's pulling one over on you.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)And that narrative happens to match reality.
So fuck your standard "narrative" bullshit as a way to try and dismiss someone else's point of view, g.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)"In the 256-page document The Joy of Love, Francis makes no change in church doctrine and strongly upholds that marriage is a lifelong commitment." (emphasis mine)
Wonder why.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)NEVER.
Cartoonist
(7,530 posts)The Pope is telling the rest of us to put out the fire but don't use his water.
Religion is evil even when they try to be good.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)If you have a problem with the church's rules, than you have a problem with the church's rules.
Most Catholics use birth control. So the argument that the church is causing overpopulation is bogus. Hate religion if you want, but get the facts straight.
Voltaire2
(14,703 posts)get the facts straight. In other very catholic parts of the world, the story is quite different. In Latin America and parts of Africa the RCC has worked diligently and frequently effectively to block access to contraceptives.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)Not all of those countrys population are women who support Catholic Church rules. Most likely it minuscule.
Just as much education about family planning is taught,
Bottom line blaming the church for over population is bogus.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)They also work to make contraception more difficult to obtain in every country.
I blame the church, not for the entire problem of overpopulation (nice straw man!), but for doing nothing to address it - and in fact, making it worse.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)Or do you think the RCC stance (not what you think all Catholics do) on birth control is just fine. I think it's bad. Period.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Fuck your "narrative" bullshit, g. Engage in actual discussion. Answer my question.
I know you won't, of course. You'll just hurl another insult or toss out another coy remark about narratives or choirs or similar nonsense because you're afraid of actual discussion. You hate seeing religion criticized and since you can't defend it, you attack the critics.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,170 posts)That would be patently wrong. I am well versed in RCC dogma.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Because the commentary in this thread seems to imply the institutional definition of the term, i.e., the clergy.
Incidentally, not all non-Catholics were always non-Catholics. You might want to keep that in mind.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Maybe he could also push new theologies of accepting gay people, not obstructing access to health care, and not willfully endangering children... you know, if he isn't too busy going after low-hanging fruit.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)This pope, like every one who preceded him, is a ("literal" holier-than-thou hypocrite.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)saying all those nice things... how could he possibly be a hypocrite?
Sarcasm FTW!
Voltaire2
(14,703 posts)current and future popes are locked in to the official pronouncements of their predecessors. In fact that may have been a primary motivation for the adoption of the infallibility doctrine in the late 19th century