Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:09 AM Jun 2019

Does the ACLU agree with religious groups on teaching the Bible in Schools?

Last edited Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:51 AM - Edit history (1)

Recently, a thread in this group quoted an author's article on the religionnews.com website. That quote said:

In its Joint Statement on Current Law and Religion in the Public Schools, the organization {ACLU} declared, “It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries.”


As another poster pointed out, that joint statement was made by a committee made up of representatives of the following organizations:

American Jewish Congress, Chair
American Civil Liberties Union
American Jewish Committee
American Muslim Council
Anti-Defamation League
Baptist Joint Committee
Christian Legal Society
General Conference of Seventh day Adventists
National Association of Evangelicals
National Council of Churches People for the American Way
Union of American Hebrew Congregations

So, it's sort of partly true, but note the word "objectively" in that statement.

But, here's the kicker: That limited joint statement was issued 24 years ago, in 1995.

The date was not mentioned in the original article, leading readers to think that that statement was a recent one. It was not.

Why did I start a new thread about this? Because it is an example of how bias in publications often makes what one reads on biased websites deceptive. Unless the article was carefully fact-checked, it would be easy to believe that the ACLU recently agreed with some unnamed religious groups about teaching the Bible in public schools. That the date of that joint statement was not included in the article at religionnews.com was not just an oversight. It was a deliberate omission, made to add weight to something that happened almost a quarter-century ago. My new thread was created to bring attention to that fact.

Both I and another DUer, AtheistCrusader, searched for that statement and found the information that it was 24 years old. We both posted that in existing threads here, just to make sure that people had the whole story - not just the slanted story from religionnews.com. Just because something is written on the Internet does not mean that the writing is not heavily biased and deliberately deceptive. All too often, articles posted on sites like religionnews.com do not tell the whole story. They tell just what is useful for that site to put forward.

The ACLU, indeed, believes that teaching about the Bible's impact on history and its part in our literary history is OK. That, however, is not the goal of the religious right, which seeks to, and is succeeding in, getting the bible taught in schools as a means of evangelizing students. The ACLU is unalterably opposed to that, and files several lawsuits each year to stop such illegal government promotion of religious beliefs. It is not working with religious organizations to promote religion in public schools, and never will.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does the ACLU agree with religious groups on teaching the Bible in Schools? (Original Post) MineralMan Jun 2019 OP
Well WHATABOUT that, huh? n/t trotsky Jun 2019 #1
I suspect the one who repeatedly connects timeliness with relevance might want to know this Major Nikon Jun 2019 #2
Oh, the Christian Right was trying to get the Bible taught in schools MineralMan Jun 2019 #3
Trying badly Major Nikon Jun 2019 #4
The role of religion in history Cartoonist Jun 2019 #5
Exactly. The Religious want to teach religion. MineralMan Jun 2019 #6
I've got to admit, it's a funny picture Cartoonist Jun 2019 #11
They especially want it in schools Major Nikon Jun 2019 #9
The poster in question moved on to Voltaire2 Jun 2019 #7
Yes. That trick won't work, either. MineralMan Jun 2019 #8
Wonder how long that will last? Major Nikon Jun 2019 #10
How clever of you. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #16
False. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #15
The poster did not start an op about how Voltaire2 Jun 2019 #17
When all else fails there's always gaslighting Major Nikon Jun 2019 #18
Pure projection. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #24
For me the bigger issue was the lies that were cloaked AROUND that bit about the ACLU, AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #12
Yes. The problem is the source of such stories. MineralMan Jun 2019 #13
Proportional Coverage SomewhereInTheMiddle Jun 2019 #19
That would make sense, and to a degree that is what I have observed. AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #23
So, in essence, the article was correct. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #14
No, you were completely wrong. trotsky Jun 2019 #20
Laughable. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #25
Yes, your threads are laughably consistent. trotsky Jun 2019 #34
You are persistent in misframing those who you see as the enemy. guillaumeb Jun 2019 #37
You value religious privilege over secular equality. trotsky Jun 2019 #40
In a very long line of trainwrecks Major Nikon Jun 2019 #27
Yep, that's the pattern. trotsky Jun 2019 #35
Yes, I suggest you read my entire post. MineralMan Jun 2019 #21
Before, I concluded only the article you cited was full of lies. AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #22
I cannot tell you how much your assessment means to me. eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #26
Been reading "How to Win Friends and Influence People," have you? MineralMan Jun 2019 #30
Are you speaking from experience? eom guillaumeb Jun 2019 #33
It's ok. I could tell when you failed to respond to any of the points in my original post highlighti AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #31
The proselytization wolf dressed up in sheep's clothing objective history...lol Thomas Hurt Jun 2019 #28
Every chance they get. MineralMan Jun 2019 #29
They literally sue when other religions are given class time in said history and social studies AtheistCrusader Jun 2019 #32
Or they have their own children do it for them Major Nikon Jun 2019 #36
What my post said: guillaumeb Jun 2019 #38
Must my posts be "necessary?" MineralMan Jun 2019 #39

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
2. I suspect the one who repeatedly connects timeliness with relevance might want to know this
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:29 AM
Jun 2019

Oh wait, that assumes they are consistent with what they expect of others and what they expect from themselves. Nevermind. What was I thinking?

Looks like someone is trying very hard to find some sort of "counterpoint" for priests raping children. Probably best they stick to shitposting the group with whutabout China threads.

It's also true that 24 years ago, you didn't have as many alt-right Christians subverting our system of education.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
3. Oh, the Christian Right was trying to get the Bible taught in schools
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:44 AM
Jun 2019

24 years ago, too. But, they did not have an idiotic President, right-wing Congress and ultra-conservative SCOTUS to help them out back then. Today, they get support for their plans from the highest levels of government.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
4. Trying badly
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:56 AM
Jun 2019

After creationism was shot down by the courts, they just edited out the word 'Jesus' and called it "Intelligent Design", which was also rejected by the courts. The ACLU didn't have to work so hard back then.

At least this time they are smart enough to call their parables about talking donkeys and 900 yr old people "religious history".

Cartoonist

(7,530 posts)
5. The role of religion in history
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 11:01 AM
Jun 2019

I want this taught in school. Everyone should be taught about the genocide of the Americas that was driven by Christianity. It should be taught to every child how the Bible was used to justify slavery. The Church's history of sexual predation deserves study, I'm just not sure at what age to introduce it in the classroom.

I'm willing to bet that not a single organization on that list would approve of that curriculum. They don't want "objectively". They want indoctrination.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
6. Exactly. The Religious want to teach religion.
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 11:18 AM
Jun 2019

Not objective facts. They want converts, not thinkers. The ACLU is fine with teaching the impact of religion on history and the arts. They're not fine with proselytizing, which is what the religionists want.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
9. They especially want it in schools
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 11:40 AM
Jun 2019

Organized religion relies heavily on recruitment of the most vulnerable.

Voltaire2

(14,703 posts)
7. The poster in question moved on to
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 11:29 AM
Jun 2019

promoting the Southern Baptist Convention as a paradigm of Christian tolerance.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
10. Wonder how long that will last?
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 11:45 AM
Jun 2019

Given the previous shitposting trends from that one, I’m thinking a few months.

It’s as if one train wreck just isn’t enough so he has to pile on several more just to prove the first really wasn’t a biblical scale fuckup. I guess the fan club wants what it wants.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
16. How clever of you.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:51 PM
Jun 2019

Sorry that I have ruined DU for you also.

Amazing how often you feel the need to attack theists.

Voltaire2

(14,703 posts)
17. The poster did not start an op about how
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:55 PM
Jun 2019

the SBC was getting all nice about race?

The poster most certainly did and the poster knows that. Or the poster perhaps lost track of all the horseshit from rns the poster sprays into this forum? I guess that is possible.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
18. When all else fails there's always gaslighting
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 09:11 PM
Jun 2019

With a bit of pretending to be a victim thrown in for good measure.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
12. For me the bigger issue was the lies that were cloaked AROUND that bit about the ACLU,
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:04 AM
Jun 2019

claiming, for instance, that kids don't get exposure to religious history in state K-12 schools, when that is easily shown to be utterly false.

Because the kinds of people who write those lies are also the kind of people who flip their cookies when said religious history classes touch on topics like Islam.

Basically they just want to indoctrinate kids in Christianity. That's the bottom line. They want unfettered access to your kid's heads, under the guise of state education. Because it's ok to lie when you're lying for Jesus.

At the end of the day, if it's sourced to 'religionnews.com', you can assume deception.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
13. Yes. The problem is the source of such stories.
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 10:12 AM
Jun 2019

That's what I'm aiming at. We see excerpts from religionnews.com frequently in this DU group. Typically, they're just a paragraph or two long, and ignore the rest of the article to make some minor point.

Unlike a lot of DUers, I frequently click through to read the entire article. Sometimes, the article directly contradicts what was excerpted for presentation here. It's frustrating. Like some others, I point out those discrepancies whenever I can.

Religionnews.com is an advocacy website, and an apologetics-based one, at that. It's articles are mainly opinion pieces pretending to be news stories. The deceptive nature of that site is pretty obvious, but is somewhat concealed to satisfy the audience for their articles.

Religionnews.com is all about promoting religion, not news. It's slanted so far that everything runs off it and down the drain.

19. Proportional Coverage
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 09:14 AM
Jun 2019

It would be interesting if religious history or studies curricula in public schools were required to devote time to different religions proportional to their representation in the world population.

For instance according to Wikipedia the top five world religions (in terms of followers) are
• Christianity (2.4B),
• Islam (1.8B),
• Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist (1.2B)
• Hinduism (1.15B)
• Buddhism (.5B)

If they limited the curriculum to those five, out of 100 hours of instruction Christianity would only get about 30 hours of coverage.

I do not think this is an unreasonable way to divide a curriculum.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
23. That would make sense, and to a degree that is what I have observed.
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 12:48 PM
Jun 2019

It isn't enforced, but it's a byproduct of historical impact.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
14. So, in essence, the article was correct.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:48 PM
Jun 2019

Good to know that for all of the verbal outrage, you admit that what was written was correct.

As to the "slanted story", your own post here refutes your claim.

And that is why it is necessary to read the entire article.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
34. Yes, your threads are laughably consistent.
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 08:10 AM
Jun 2019

I just don't understand how someone like you who claims to embrace the message of Jesus can be so mean, spiteful, and hateful.

No wait, I understand perfectly.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
37. You are persistent in misframing those who you see as the enemy.
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 05:17 PM
Jun 2019

Including many here.

As to your last claim, we shall let others be the judges.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
40. You value religious privilege over secular equality.
Mon Jun 24, 2019, 07:10 AM
Jun 2019

In that regard, you ARE my enemy. And fuck yes, let everyone here judge.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
27. In a very long line of trainwrecks
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:18 PM
Jun 2019

The takeaway here is the reaction. The first step is denial of the facts presented, then there's gaslighting, and finally the claim those who present clear facts to counter pure nonsense are somehow engaging in an attack against "theists".

I suppose all of this would be odd enough, but then you have the motivation is a play to an imaginary audience.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
35. Yep, that's the pattern.
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 08:12 AM
Jun 2019

You'd think he would grow tired of being exposed and laughed at over and over and over, but clearly he does not.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
30. Been reading "How to Win Friends and Influence People," have you?
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:38 PM
Jun 2019

Old Dale Carnegie was the first best-selling "self-help" guru. Pretty much all of the books that came later were just someone repeating what he said.

Trouble is: most people don't bother to actually read the book and follow the advice. Or so I've observed.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
31. It's ok. I could tell when you failed to respond to any of the points in my original post highlighti
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 03:00 PM
Jun 2019

ng how utterly dishonest the 'Religion News' OpEd piece was.

Thomas Hurt

(13,925 posts)
28. The proselytization wolf dressed up in sheep's clothing objective history...lol
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:19 PM
Jun 2019

The evangelicals will on occasion proselytize minor children without the permission of their parents.

But if you can indoctrinate them in schools, so much easier.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
29. Every chance they get.
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 01:35 PM
Jun 2019

Whenever I see a push to "teach the Bible as literature" in public schools, I know there's an evangelical Christian pushing for it. That should be everyone's first clue that there are ulterior motives behind it and that they will be preaching Jesus on the students.

It never fails. We must keep an eye on such things, and speak up when it happens, and it will always happen.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
32. They literally sue when other religions are given class time in said history and social studies
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 03:02 PM
Jun 2019

curriculum.

'by their fruits you shall know them' or something like that.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
36. Or they have their own children do it for them
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 04:13 PM
Jun 2019

Organized religion is big business and they are always looking for new sheeps to shear. So there’s either a profit motive or some weak minded person being manipulated by those with a profit motive. The fact they go after children without the consent of the parents just goes to show the level of shit stains they are.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
38. What my post said:
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 05:26 PM
Jun 2019
Intriguingly, much of this crisis may be rooted in a myth. School districts and state boards of education fear recriminations if they deal with matters of faith in the classroom. Yet even the American Civil Liberties Union — dreaded in many American school districts for its lawsuits against religion in public education — urges objective teaching of the world’s religions. In its Joint Statement on Current Law and Religion in the Public Schools, the organization declared, “It is both permissible and desirable to teach objectively about the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries.”


What the ACLU says:

While it is permissible for public schools to teach about religion, it is not permissible to promote particular religious beliefs. Although public schools should not be leading children in prayers or religious ceremonies, they should also be respectful of the religious beliefs of students. Second, public schools should protect children from being coerced by others to accept religious (or anti-religious!) beliefs. Public schools should seek to create an environment conducive to learning by all students and not act as vehicles proselytizing for religious or anti-religious beliefs.


https://www.aclu.org/other/aclu-and-freedom-religion-and-belief

Given this agreement, I still fail to see the relevance or necessity of your post.

MineralMan

(147,576 posts)
39. Must my posts be "necessary?"
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 06:44 PM
Jun 2019

I think not. In reality, none of the posts in the Religion Group are necessary. All are voluntary expressions by the members. Also, it is never necessary for anyone to read them, nor to reply to them. All are voluntary actions.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Does the ACLU agree with ...