Religion
Related: About this forumWhen Buddhists Were a "National Security Threat"
Duncan Ryuken Williams
On February 19th, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an executive order designating military zones along the West Coast and laying the groundwork for US authorities to remove citizens of Japanese descent from their homes and imprison them in camps. While it is widely acknowledged that racism was central to this shameful chapter of American history, the role of religious discrimination cannot be overlooked, says scholar and Soto Zen priest Duncan Ryuken Williams.
There was a time in our countrys history when Buddhism was considered not only un-American but . . . anti-American, explains Williams, the director of the Shinso Ito Center for Japanese Religions and Culture at the University of Southern California. Buddhist priests, Shinto prieststhey were designated as national security threats.
It's important to remember that German and Italian immigrants and their descendants weren't imprisoned during WWII, almost certainly since they were predominantly Christian.
Voltaire2
(14,724 posts)This sort of intolerance would never happen in a theocracy.
Or something like that.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)Unless of course we are talking about something benevolent. In that case religion gets all the credit.
MineralMan
(147,623 posts)Alien in the sense of being different, non-conforming, and visibly not part of the vast majority. The Japanese-American citizens who were sent to the camps looked different, behaved differently, and worshiped differently. Despite many of them being native-born US citizens, they were treated as "aliens," and fear of what is different led to their imprisonment and confiscation of their property.
Chinese immigrants were excluded by law, as well.
If you are different, you are an "alien" in people's minds and therefore considered to be dangerous. This is a common pattern in human societies. We fear what we do not understand, and make very little effort to improve our understanding. The United States is no different from any other country in that regard, to our shame.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)The history of the US is written with diversity. It's that diversity which made us strong. The problem is diversity eventually evolves into a national identity. This then subjects us to the same forces of demagoguery which so easily affect other nations with homogeneous populations.
MineralMan
(147,623 posts)However, we operate on the principle of majority rule, at least psychologically. What that means is that any identifiable minority group can be identified and demonized by the majority. That's also a part of our history, and it's not a pleasant part of our history to consider.
The tyranny of the majority is a real thing. It shouldn't exist, based on our founding principles, but does exist, due to the belief on some people's parts that the majority rules in all things. It's a paradoxical element in our society.