Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge says Bible is rule of the land. (Original Post) Cartoonist Jan 2019 OP
That's not what the judge said. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #1
Actions speak louder than words Cartoonist Jan 2019 #2
Where in the judge's opinion does it say that? The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #4
Who said this? Cartoonist Jan 2019 #9
The managers of the place the couple wanted to move to said that. Not the judge. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #10
There's nothing in the judge's opinion suggesting anything of the kind. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #8
I thought women were smarter Cartoonist Jan 2019 #11
She wasn't being dumb. She was following the law, which is her obligation. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #13
There are those who aren't so sure that's the only remedy Major Nikon Jan 2019 #14
It would be too much of a leap for a trial judge because it would be contrary to The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #15
I'm not disputing that part Major Nikon Jan 2019 #16
Missouri continues its 'show me' attitude of hate and animosity towards all but old white men... SWBTATTReg Jan 2019 #3
This is so damn absurd! Pulls the bible outta his ass and says this, FFS!!! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2019 #5
The judge is a "she," not a "he," The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #20
Thanks for the correction!!! RKP5637 Jan 2019 #21
is that some sort of church affiliated religious housing? AlexSFCA Jan 2019 #6
The judge's opinion is at the link. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #7
Gonna have to go with The Velveteen Ocelot on this one uriel1972 Jan 2019 #12
Our Mission struggle4progress Jan 2019 #17
I don't think *I'd* want to live there. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #18
I try to fight some battles I'm sure to win when I want to fight some I won't struggle4progress Jan 2019 #19

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
1. That's not what the judge said.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:41 PM
Jan 2019

The ruling was not that "the Bible is the rule of the land," but that federal law does not protect LGBT relationships in housing claims. Which is true, but obviously it shouldn't be. The couple brought their lawsuit on the basis of sex discrimination, which is protected by federal law, but the judge didn't accept that argument. The couple is going to appeal.

Cartoonist

(7,530 posts)
9. Who said this?
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:54 PM
Jan 2019

their marriage is not "understood in the Bible.”
_

I thought it was the judge. Article does not make it clear.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
8. There's nothing in the judge's opinion suggesting anything of the kind.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:54 PM
Jan 2019
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/4f/64fef240-d334-599c-929a-0fa6755a28f7/5c3fe3c00af81.pdf.pdf

And you assumed the judge was male. She isn't. But those unfortunate sexist assumptions still are made frequently, just like unfortunate assumptions are still made about LGBT people.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
13. She wasn't being dumb. She was following the law, which is her obligation.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 01:00 PM
Jan 2019

The remedy is for Congress to amend the statute to include discrimination in housing to include LGBT people.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
14. There are those who aren't so sure that's the only remedy
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 01:20 PM
Jan 2019

There have been numerous legal attempts to argue laws against sexual discrimination must include sexual orientation. Some have been successful and some have not.

The current position of the EEOC is sexual orientation is included in laws that prohibit sexual discrimination in employment practices. While that isn't the same law that protects sexual discrimination in housing practices, it's not that much of a leap in jurisprudence.

Overview

EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. These protections apply regardless of any contrary state or local laws.

Through investigation, conciliation, and litigation of charges by individuals against private sector employers, as well as hearings and appeals for federal sector workers, the Commission has taken the position that existing sex discrimination provisions in Title VII protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) applicants and employees against employment bias. The Commission has obtained approximately $6.4 million in monetary relief for individuals, as well as numerous employer policy changes, in voluntary resolutions of LGBT discrimination charges under Title VII since data collection began in 2013. A growing number of court decisions have endorsed the Commission's interpretation of Title VII.
https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/wysk/enforcement_protections_lgbt_workers.cfm

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
15. It would be too much of a leap for a trial judge because it would be contrary to
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 01:25 PM
Jan 2019

controlling previous interpretations by the circuit court of appeals. Trial judges are pretty much stuck with the next level appellate court has decided (I once clerked for an appellate court and saw this dynamic just about every day). Maybe on appeal this couple can convince the Eight Circuit to change its mind.

SWBTATTReg

(24,085 posts)
3. Missouri continues its 'show me' attitude of hate and animosity towards all but old white men...
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:46 PM
Jan 2019

God, I hate this state where I live. I'm embarrassed and disgusted at the same time.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
20. The judge is a "she," not a "he,"
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 05:18 PM
Jan 2019

which is a common sexist assumption about judges. The judge also did not base her decision on the Bible or religious principles but on the particular statute relating to housing discrimination and on interpretations of that statute by the higher controlling court. https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/4f/64fef240-d334-599c-929a-0fa6755a28f7/5c3fe3c00af81.pdf.pdf

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
7. The judge's opinion is at the link.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:52 PM
Jan 2019
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/4f/64fef240-d334-599c-929a-0fa6755a28f7/5c3fe3c00af81.pdf.pdf Nowhere does it say the decision was based on the Bible. Instead, it is based on a specific federal statute and previous rulings by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreting that statute, which this trial judge was obligated to follow. The solution to this clearly unfair situation is to amend the statute, not bust on a judge for applying the Bible, which isn't what happened.

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
12. Gonna have to go with The Velveteen Ocelot on this one
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 12:58 PM
Jan 2019

Whether religion played a part in their judgement is debatable, if the Judge did not make a reference to it then they did not claim it was the law of the land.

While I despair at religious bigotry, without evidence it is tough to prove. Atheists can be as bigoted as Theists from experience.

struggle4progress

(120,245 posts)
17. Our Mission
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 01:30 PM
Jan 2019

... Guided by Biblical principles that honor Jesus Christ, provide a loving, warm, gracious and secure environment where all experience physical, spiritual and emotional care ...

https://www.friendshipvillagestl.com/our-mission.html

The Velveteen Ocelot

(120,828 posts)
18. I don't think *I'd* want to live there.
Fri Jan 18, 2019, 01:35 PM
Jan 2019

It sounds like it's full of the sort of smug, judgmental people I'd rather not hang out with. But that's not the point. They shouldn't be able to exclude people who do want to live there.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Judge says Bible is rule ...