Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cartoonist

(7,530 posts)
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 08:52 AM Nov 2018

God breaks his promise

Found in Environment & Energy (Group).
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1127121357

The United States Geological Survey points to sea level rise caused by climate change, and some scientists suggest the land may also be sinking, but the locals insist erosion alone is to blame.

Forty-year-old high school history teacher Dwayne Crockett agrees. He cites the Bible to support his belief that sea level rise is not a factor in Tangier's troubles. After Noah and his animals survived on the ark, he says, "the Lord promised, 'Never again will I destroy the Earth with a flood!'"
_
This is another example of why religion is a blight on the world. When you believe stupid shit, you end up being stupid.

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
God breaks his promise (Original Post) Cartoonist Nov 2018 OP
You have retold ... TwistOneUp Nov 2018 #1
The flood is a metaphor for cleansing. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #2
Sez who, Guy? MineralMan Nov 2018 #3
I just did. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #4
All that really proves is fundamentalists are more honest Major Nikon Nov 2018 #10
So you claim a special insight into what the writers intended? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #15
Are you trying to be funny, because this is a special kind of funny Major Nikon Nov 2018 #17
So yes, your response confirms it. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #20
Strawman bullshit doesn't do your argument any favors Major Nikon Nov 2018 #25
Your words defeat this response: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #26
So now you're trying to pretend I meant something other than exactly what I said Major Nikon Nov 2018 #29
And now you revert back to your preferred response. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #33
The revision and argument that followed was yours Major Nikon Nov 2018 #37
Stick with the gif(t). guillaumeb Nov 2018 #40
I'd rather you just continue to explain what I meant as that shit is hilarious Major Nikon Nov 2018 #41
Better. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #42
Try to stay focused Major Nikon Nov 2018 #43
We may argue exactly what the intent of certain statements are. marylandblue Nov 2018 #52
And there are arguments as to what that "literal" interpretation is. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #54
Which is not what I said marylandblue Dec 2018 #62
Apologetics don't cut it, Guy. MineralMan Nov 2018 #12
And you are the definer of what the writers intended? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #16
But you already declared yourself the definer. trotsky Nov 2018 #18
Nah, he's claiming "history" defined it as "metaphorical" Major Nikon Nov 2018 #19
The answer is here: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #21
Nope, no answer there. trotsky Nov 2018 #36
Too easy. But thank you anyway. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #38
Yeah, the correct one Major Nikon Nov 2018 #46
I'll agree with you on your last phrase. trotsky Dec 2018 #68
See #46. MN agrees with my view. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #47
I agreed that a reasonable person will arrive at a conclusion Major Nikon Nov 2018 #48
That isn't what this is about. trotsky Dec 2018 #69
No. I'm an analyst of what the writings say. MineralMan Nov 2018 #22
And many analysts support the view that the use of water as a metaphor guillaumeb Nov 2018 #23
Let's see some links, Guy. MineralMan Dec 2018 #55
#4 guillaumeb Dec 2018 #56
No, my dear Guillaume, I saw that one. Random essays from blog sites MineralMan Dec 2018 #57
OK. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #58
I understand your need to deflect from the question. MineralMan Dec 2018 #59
I understand your need to frame and control the dialogue. eom guillaumeb Dec 2018 #60
My screen name appears about 6 times in the list of replies to this thread. MineralMan Dec 2018 #61
Water has more than one meaning in the Bible. marylandblue Dec 2018 #63
The Bible flood story has amazing similarity to the flood story in the Epic Of Gilgamesh, VMA131Marine Nov 2018 #30
Yes, so it does... MineralMan Nov 2018 #32
There's also numerous other flood myths that pre-dated Major Nikon Nov 2018 #44
Correct! VMA131Marine Nov 2018 #45
Find the place in that article where it talks about edhopper Nov 2018 #13
Everything on that link is about washing and drinking water marylandblue Nov 2018 #49
Water cleanses sin. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #53
Well sure. In the specific case of the flood Voltaire2 Dec 2018 #64
A metaphoric slaughter? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #65
Sure, a metaphoric slaughter. Voltaire2 Dec 2018 #66
Nobody is arguing that the flood narrative is literal marylandblue Dec 2018 #67
It can't be, as your allegation is illogical. TwistOneUp Nov 2018 #5
Your framing lacks nuance. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #6
I'm glad someone knows exactly what everything in the Bible means... uriel1972 Nov 2018 #7
He doesn't know any better than anyone else Major Nikon Nov 2018 #9
I identified this as my opinion. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #24
"The flood is a metaphor for cleansing." Major Nikon Nov 2018 #28
Each of my responses is not a separate treatise on my world view. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #31
When someone claims something "is" something, that IS an assertion of fact Major Nikon Nov 2018 #34
As to accuracy, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #35
Keep digging Major Nikon Nov 2018 #39
When has floodwater ever been a metaphor for cleansing? marylandblue Nov 2018 #50
Floods are wet aren't they? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #51
It is because gil decided it is. trotsky Dec 2018 #70
"his opinion is better" He has convinced himself. MineralMan Dec 2018 #71
It's not that his opinion is better than others, marylandblue Dec 2018 #72
You lack honesty Major Nikon Nov 2018 #8
Your argument is false. I call BS. TwistOneUp Nov 2018 #11
Ok. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #14
Technically he is correct? HopeAgain Nov 2018 #27

TwistOneUp

(1,020 posts)
1. You have retold ...
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 09:08 AM
Nov 2018

The reason why many Christians never peepared for the hurricane-driven flooding of 2017. Reporters asked people why they were staying, and the people said, "god promised us he would never give us another flood".

I feel sorry for people that cannot think clearly due to an accident of Nature (i.e., congenital, by a birthing accident, genes, whatever). It may sound cruel, but I do not feel sorry for people that Can Think, but instead Choose Not To Think.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
2. The flood is a metaphor for cleansing.
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 05:00 PM
Nov 2018

Like using water to baptize.


On the other hand, one hopes that Mr. Crockett has a better knowledge of hsitory that he does of science.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
10. All that really proves is fundamentalists are more honest
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 08:45 PM
Nov 2018

The flood mythology in the bible is pretty elaborate detailing exactly who and what was worthy of being saved from genocide, how human lifespans were changed, mythical creatures that existed before the flood, and dimensions of the ark just to name a few.

The idea that all of this wasn’t intended by the original authors to be taken literally is no more believable than the actual story itself. Your opinion, which you dishonestly tried to pass off as fact is just less honest than the literal interpretation.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
17. Are you trying to be funny, because this is a special kind of funny
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 12:53 PM
Nov 2018

Otherwise it seems more than a bit silly to explain to you that it doesn't take "special insight" to derive intent from the written word, just basic literacy.

Not only are you claiming "special" insight, you are pretending your "special" insight is a matter of historical fact and is widely accepted with literally thousands of years of nobody agreeing with you until heresy laws could no longer shield the masses from reality. Seems more than just a bit "special" to me, but I'm sure you think everyone else just doesn't understand what is so clear to you.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
20. So yes, your response confirms it.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:10 PM
Nov 2018

People in the US argue over the original intent of things written 200 years ago. Are they all sub-literate?

But you seem quite certain that you know the sole intent of writers who wrote thousands of years ago. And anyone who disagrees with you is clearly lacking in understanding. The very definition of a fundamentalist.

Ironic.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
25. Strawman bullshit doesn't do your argument any favors
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:30 PM
Nov 2018

I'm not the one who is claiming my non-literal interpretation is a matter of historical fact. That would be you.

I'm not the one who is claiming the intent of the original authors is "widely shared". That would be you. Repeatedly no less.

I'm not claiming anyone else is "lacking in understanding". That would be your typical canned response you use when anyone else calls bullshit on your assertions.

So if you now want to project any of that intellectual bankruptcy on me, be my guest but it just isn't that hard to prove where that nonsense is originating.

I'm not claiming to know and I really don't care what the original intent was. All I can say is your interpretation doesn't even begin to pass the smell test regardless of how many fallacies you throw at it.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
26. Your words defeat this response:
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:32 PM
Nov 2018
All that really proves is fundamentalists are more honest

The flood mythology in the bible is pretty elaborate detailing exactly who and what was worthy of being saved from genocide, how human lifespans were changed, mythical creatures that existed before the flood, and dimensions of the ark just to name a few.

The idea that all of this wasn’t intended by the original authors to be taken literally is no more believable than the actual story itself. Your opinion, which you dishonestly tried to pass off as fact is just less honest than the literal interpretation.


Look at the highlighted part.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
29. So now you're trying to pretend I meant something other than exactly what I said
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:39 PM
Nov 2018

While simultaneously trying to argue someone else meant something other than exactly what they said.

Classic!

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
37. The revision and argument that followed was yours
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:59 PM
Nov 2018

Which is the epitome of strawman bullshit.

My claim was the "metaphorical" interpretation you assert as allegedly "widely accepted" just isn't believable. I get that you can only think in terms of absolutes, but believe it or not calling bullshit on someone does not require an alternate conclusion. You know, kinda like when you pretend atheists must have belief.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
41. I'd rather you just continue to explain what I meant as that shit is hilarious
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 02:06 PM
Nov 2018

Which is decidedly your gift.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
43. Try to stay focused
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 03:32 PM
Nov 2018

You were telling me what I wrote wasn’t what I wrote. Now you’re just back to being a buzzkill.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
52. We may argue exactly what the intent of certain statements are.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 10:05 PM
Nov 2018

But everybody agrees the Constitution was intended literally.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
54. And there are arguments as to what that "literal" interpretation is.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 12:01 PM
Dec 2018

Witness the debate over the meaning of the 2nd Amendment.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
62. Which is not what I said
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 02:30 PM
Dec 2018

Does anybody think "right to bear arms," is actually a pun and may refer to the custom of carrying ursine appendages? But 3,000 years from now, when perhaps weapons have become barbarous relics of the past, perhaps some clever interpreter will be unable to accept that his ancestors actually believed violence was a good way to settle disputes. So he may come up some nicer interpretation, and he might even have some contemporaries who applaud his cleverness and agree that yes, the Constitution is and always was just a metaphor.

MineralMan

(147,572 posts)
12. Apologetics don't cut it, Guy.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 09:13 AM
Nov 2018

The Flood story is quite detailed and does not appear to have been meant to be metaphorical. It was told as the act of an angry deity who was displeased with its imperfect creation. So, the malevolent creator decided to simply destroy the humans, save one family. Cleansing? Well, in the sense of racial or species cleansing, perhaps. Offend the deity and it will simply kill you.

It's not a metaphor for some sort of refreshing bath, dear. It is a metaphor for petty retribution by the deity and is meant as a cautionary tale, not a metaphor for baptism or any other cleansing ritual.

You have stretched credulity beyond its breaking point with this. And so have all of the apologists who have tried to use this argument to disguise their vengeful and petty deity.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
18. But you already declared yourself the definer.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 12:57 PM
Nov 2018

Why is that a bad thing for others, but A-OK for you to do?

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
19. Nah, he's claiming "history" defined it as "metaphorical"
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:10 PM
Nov 2018

Even though for virtually all of the last two thousand years, a metaphorical interpretation gained you and your books an invitation to the town BBQ.



guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
21. The answer is here:
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:12 PM
Nov 2018
I just did.

And that opinion is very widely shared.

One source, of many:


Note that I referred to it as an opinion, not a fact.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
36. Nope, no answer there.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:55 PM
Nov 2018

MineralMan *also* gave his opinion, yet you attacked him with your stale old pathetic "decider" routine.

It's nice to see you've laid off your "choir" bit - maybe the criticism of you dehumanizing others finally sunk in a bit. But you need to drop ALL your hypocritical and nasty attacks to begin to be taken seriously.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
38. Too easy. But thank you anyway.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 02:01 PM
Nov 2018

Response to guillaumeb (Reply #4)
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 08:13 AM
MineralMan (113,835 posts)
12. Apologetics don't cut it, Guy.

The Flood story is quite detailed and does not appear to have been meant to be metaphorical. It was told as the act of an angry deity who was displeased with its imperfect creation. So, the malevolent creator decided to simply destroy the humans, save one family. Cleansing? Well, in the sense of racial or species cleansing, perhaps. Offend the deity and it will simply kill you.

It's not a metaphor for some sort of refreshing bath, dear. It is a metaphor for petty retribution by the deity and is meant as a cautionary tale, not a metaphor for baptism or any other cleansing ritual.

You have stretched credulity beyond its breaking point with this. And so have all of the apologists who have tried to use this argument to disguise their vengeful and petty deity


So, speaking of taking a person seriously, MM is quite strong in his view. He said it "does not appear to …"etc. And taken in context with his entire reply, with references to apologetics and stretching credulity, a reasonable reader will arrive at one conclusion.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
46. Yeah, the correct one
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 07:08 PM
Nov 2018

Genesis goes to great lengths to describe the flood myth. The manifest is listed, dimensions of the ark are given, timelines are provided, extent and scope of the flood is detailed. So why go to all that trouble of providing such details of a literal flood when it was all just a metaphor for a foot washing? Neither you nor your source you allege agrees with you have an explanation. Very telling that.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
68. I'll agree with you on your last phrase.
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 08:35 AM
Dec 2018

A reasonable reader of the threads that you smear and attack everyone who offers an opinion different than yours WILL arrive at one conclusion.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
48. I agreed that a reasonable person will arrive at a conclusion
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 07:59 PM
Nov 2018

Which is the opposite of your unreasonable and poorly supported opinion. Not sure if you want to mark that up as anything other than a magnificent faceplant.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
69. That isn't what this is about.
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 08:41 AM
Dec 2018

But you knew that.

It's about your endless hypocritical attacks - deciding for yourself what not only your religion is, but everyone else's (or lack thereof). You define Islam for Muslims. You define atheism for atheists. When cornered, you coyly reply that you've merely given your opinion. But when others offer their opinion, you sneer and call them a "decider."

Your behavior is clear to all.

Perhaps you should behave more like a Christian... but then again, that could be why you behave the way you do.

MineralMan

(147,572 posts)
22. No. I'm an analyst of what the writings say.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:18 PM
Nov 2018

I'm not bad at that, by the way. It was my specialty for quite some time, you know, analyzing writings.

So, rather than defining, I'm describing and then interpreting. Since none of us can ask the authors, that's the tool we have to use - analysis.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
23. And many analysts support the view that the use of water as a metaphor
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:20 PM
Nov 2018

for spiritual cleansing is a very common one in the Bible.


And I did refer to this as my opinion, as well.

MineralMan

(147,572 posts)
55. Let's see some links, Guy.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 12:51 PM
Dec 2018

You are in that camp, so show us your supporting links.

The flood is a metaphor for punishment for evildoing, if it's a metaphor for anything. If you do wrong, you risk being killed by an angry deity. A lot of deities are like that. It's intentional, see. Since scriptures are cultures' way of codifying rules, the punishment part is a natural. They're saying:

"Look what happens when you violate "God's" laws. Screw up and god gets angry and kills you, along with everyone else, if things are bad enough."

It's not a "cleansing" metaphor, unless you're talking about something like "racial cleansing."

But, please feel free to present your supporting analysts' arguments. I'll look forward to re-analyzing them.

MineralMan

(147,572 posts)
57. No, my dear Guillaume, I saw that one. Random essays from blog sites
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 01:02 PM
Dec 2018

don't really count, see. Surely you have some others from prominent theologians, right?

MineralMan

(147,572 posts)
61. My screen name appears about 6 times in the list of replies to this thread.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 02:06 PM
Dec 2018

How could I control the dialog? I'm only a minor part of this lengthy discussion. How many times does your screen name appear, I wonder? By my quick count, it appears 22 times. And you did not even start the thread. Who is trying to control the dialog, after all? "He who has eyes to see, let him see."

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
63. Water has more than one meaning in the Bible.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 08:36 PM
Dec 2018

There are also bitter waters mentioned. How do you tell which kind of water is meant, except by context?

VMA131Marine

(4,646 posts)
30. The Bible flood story has amazing similarity to the flood story in the Epic Of Gilgamesh,
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:39 PM
Nov 2018

which substantially predates it. It's a derivative work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgamesh_flood_myth

Ea leaks the secret plan
Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh a secret story that begins in the old city of Shuruppak on the banks of the Euphrates River.
The "great gods" Anu, Enlil, Ninurta, Ennugi, and Ea were sworn to secrecy about their plan to cause the flood.
But the god Ea (Sumerian god Enki) repeated the plan to Utnapishtim through a reed wall in a reed house.
Ea commanded Utnapishtim to demolish his house and build a boat, regardless of the cost, to keep living beings alive.
The boat must have equal dimensions with corresponding width and length and be covered over like Apsu boats.
Utnapishtim promised to do what Ea commanded.
He asked Ea what he should say to the city elders and the population.
Ea tells him to say that Enlil has rejected him and he can no longer reside in the city or set foot in Enlil's territory.
He should also say that he will go down to the Apsu "to live with my lord Ea".
Note: 'Apsu' can refer to a fresh water marsh near the temple of Ea/Enki at the city of Eridu.[9]
Ea will provide abundant rain, a profusion of fowl and fish, and a wealthy harvest of wheat and bread.


Building and launching the boat
Carpenters, reed workers, and other people assembled one morning.
[missing lines]
Five days later, Utnapishtim laid out the exterior walls of the boat of 120 cubits.
The sides of the superstructure had equal lengths of 120 cubits. He also made a drawing of the interior structure.
The boat had six decks [?] divided into seven and nine compartments.
Water plugs were driven into the middle part.
Punting poles and other necessary things were laid in.
Three times 3,600 units of raw bitumen were melted in a kiln and three times 3,600 units of oil were used in addition to two times 3,600 units of oil that were stored in the boat.
Oxen and sheep were slaughtered and ale, beer, oil, and wine were distributed to the workmen, like at a new year's festival.
When the boat was finished, the launching was very difficult. A runway of poles was used to slide the boat into the water.
Two-thirds of the boat was in the water.
Utnapishtim loaded his silver and gold into the boat.
He loaded "all the living beings that I had."
His relatives and craftsmen, and "all the beasts and animals of the field" boarded the boat.
The time arrived, as stated by the god Shamash, to seal the entry door.


The storm
Early in the morning at dawn a black cloud arose from the horizon.
The weather was frightful.
Utnapishtim boarded the boat and entrusted the boat and its contents to his boatmaster Puzurammurri who sealed the entry.
The thunder god Adad rumbled in the cloud and storm gods Shullar and Hanish went over mountains and land.
Erragal pulled out the mooring poles and the dikes overflowed.
The Annunnaki gods lit up the land with their lightning.
There was stunned shock at Adad's deeds which turned everything to blackness. The land was shattered like a pot.
All day long the south wind blew rapidly and the water overwhelmed the people like an attack.
No one could see his fellows. They could not recognize each other in the torrent.
The gods were frightened by the flood, and retreated up to the Anu heaven. They cowered like dogs lying by the outer wall.
Ishtar shrieked like a woman in childbirth.
The Mistress of the gods wailed that the old days had turned to clay because "I said evil things in the Assembly of the Gods, ordering a catastrophe to destroy my people who fill the sea like fish."
The other gods were weeping with her and sat sobbing with grief, their lips burning, parched with thirst.
The flood and wind lasted six days and six nights, flattening the land.
On the seventh day, the storm was pounding [intermittently?] like a woman in labor.


Calm after the storm
The sea calmed and the whirlwind and flood stopped. All day long there was quiet. All humans had turned to clay.
The terrain was as flat as a roof top. Utnapishtim opened a window and felt fresh air on his face.
He fell to his knees and sat weeping, tears streaming down his face. He looked for coastlines at the horizon and saw a region of land.
The boat lodged firmly on mount Nimush which held the boat for several days, allowing no swaying.
On the seventh day he released a dove which flew away, but came back to him. He released a swallow, but it also came back to him.
He released a raven which was able to eat and scratch, and did not circle back to the boat.
He then sent his livestock out in various directions.


The sacrifice
He sacrificed a sheep and offered incense at a mountainous ziggurat where he placed 14 sacrificial vessels and poured reeds, cedar, and myrtle into the fire.
The gods smelled the sweet odor of the sacrificial animal and gathered like flies over the sacrifice.
Then the great goddess arrived, lifted up her flies (beads), and said
"Ye gods, as surely as I shall not forget this lapis lazuli [amulet] around my neck, I shall be mindful of these days and never forget them! The gods may come to the sacrificial offering. But Enlil may not come, because he brought about the flood and annihilated my people without considering [the consequences]."
When Enlil arrived, he saw the boat and became furious at the Igigi gods. He said "Where did a living being escape? No man was to survive the annihilation!"
Ninurta spoke to Enlil saying "Who else but Ea could do such a thing? It is Ea who knew all of our plans."
Ea spoke to Enlil saying "It was you, the Sage of the Gods. How could you bring about a flood without consideration?"
Ea then accuses Enlil of sending a disproportionate punishment, and reminds him of the need for compassion.
Ea denies leaking the god's secret plan to Atrahasis (= Utnapishtim), admitting only sending him a dream and deflecting Enlil's attention to the flood hero.

The flood hero and his wife are granted immortality and transported far away
He then boards a boat and grasping Utnapishtim's hand, helps him and his wife aboard where they kneel. Standing between Utnapishtim and his wife, he touches their foreheads and blesses them. "Formerly Utnapishtim was a human being, but now he and his wife have become gods like us. Let Utnapishtim reside far away, at the mouth of the rivers."
Utnapishtim and his wife are transported and settled at the "mouth of the rivers".

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
44. There's also numerous other flood myths that pre-dated
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 06:54 PM
Nov 2018

Floods as divine retribution for wickedness was a reoccurring theme well before Genesis was authored. It wasn’t as if they invented the story. They just repeated the story changing up some of the details to make it appear genuine.

edhopper

(34,783 posts)
13. Find the place in that article where it talks about
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 10:28 AM
Nov 2018

the destructive, genocidal flood. Not Jesus washing peoples feet.


We'll wait.......

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
49. Everything on that link is about washing and drinking water
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 09:55 PM
Nov 2018

Nothing about Noah or floods.

Your interpretation is like saying sacramental candles represent forest fires.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
53. Water cleanses sin.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 12:00 PM
Dec 2018

The metaphor. So my comment is appropriate, and well known and accepted in the faith community.



Now, as to candles, let us consider:


Light/Jesus/the Creator? Yes, probably a comment on forest fires.

Voltaire2

(14,701 posts)
64. Well sure. In the specific case of the flood
Sun Dec 2, 2018, 06:54 AM
Dec 2018

this “cleansing” was accomplished by your vile god slaughtering everything by drowning them, right?

Voltaire2

(14,701 posts)
66. Sure, a metaphoric slaughter.
Sun Dec 2, 2018, 01:11 PM
Dec 2018

Your vile gods, angry at their fucked up creation, cleanse their world by drowning everything. We all agree this never happened. You think there is some good news in this fairy tale.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
67. Nobody is arguing that the flood narrative is literal
Sun Dec 2, 2018, 01:35 PM
Dec 2018

Rather, we are arguing that it is a metaphor for an angry genocidal God. There are place in the Bible that depict a loving God. This isn't one of them.

TwistOneUp

(1,020 posts)
5. It can't be, as your allegation is illogical.
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 06:36 PM
Nov 2018

Just ask any fundagelical: the xtian bible must be taken *literally*. Literally implies the non-existence of metaphors.

Either there are no metaphors in the bible or there are.

If there are metaphors, then the xtian bible cannot be taken literally. Since it's just a poorly-written book of fiction, we can safely ignore it.

If there are no metaphors, the big potato promised that it would never flood again and it did, so the big potato lied.

Thus, either way in this palaver, you have no further argument.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
6. Your framing lacks nuance.
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 07:20 PM
Nov 2018

First, you define all Christians as Biblical literalists.

Second, look at the link in my previous reply, #3, and start with that.

Water as a symbol for cleansing is everywhere in the Bible. The flood is a dramatic, large scale, illustration of that symbol. Baptim is a small scale illustration.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
9. He doesn't know any better than anyone else
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 08:22 PM
Nov 2018

He just wants to claim the bible is metaphorical when it’s demonstrably false and literal when it’s convenient.

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
24. I identified this as my opinion.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:22 PM
Nov 2018

And stated that others share that opinion.

As to my arrogance, that is another matter.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
28. "The flood is a metaphor for cleansing."
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:35 PM
Nov 2018
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=298941

You only identified this as your "opinion" when you were called on it. Is it really that hard to be honest about what is so easily verified?

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
31. Each of my responses is not a separate treatise on my world view.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:40 PM
Nov 2018

And you read the entire thread, and in context.

Try again.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
34. When someone claims something "is" something, that IS an assertion of fact
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:48 PM
Nov 2018

If you want your opinion to be taken as an opinion replacing "is" with 'I think' or 'I believe' or 'I understand' IS helpful and decidedly less duplicitous.

Just sayin'

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
35. As to accuracy,
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:50 PM
Nov 2018

I said that water is a metaphor. If I had stated that it was the metaphor, meaning the only reasonable metaphor, or even stronger, the only metaphor, I would agree with you.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
50. When has floodwater ever been a metaphor for cleansing?
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 10:01 PM
Nov 2018

Floodwater is muddy and carries disease. Floods don't clean anything. They leave an awful mess and then you have to clean up afterward.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
70. It is because gil decided it is.
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 08:43 AM
Dec 2018

And he's the decider. Maybe it's just his opinion, but you need to keep in mind that his opinion is better than everyone else's.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
72. It's not that his opinion is better than others,
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 09:22 AM
Dec 2018

It's that anything may be justified by calling it "opinion." Is Trump the world's greatest genius? Many people say he is. It's just a matter of opinion.

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
8. You lack honesty
Thu Nov 29, 2018, 08:17 PM
Nov 2018

First, that’s not what he said.

Second, you trying to pass off your opinion as fact.

TwistOneUp

(1,020 posts)
11. Your argument is false. I call BS.
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 07:53 AM
Nov 2018

"First, you define all Christians as Biblical literalists."
No, I did not. That is a lie. I don't profile Christians. I don't profile anyone.

"Second, look at the link in my previous reply, #3, and start with that."
I am not going to argue with you. Your "bible" is fiction. As I am science-based, i.e., fact-based, not fiction-based, I safely ignore it. And if I ever wanted to read fiction, there are plenty of books to read besides some 2000-year out of date nonsense about selling my daughter into slavery or stoning my son for not behaving.

"Water as a symbol for cleansing is everywhere in the Bible. The flood is a dramatic, large scale, illustration of that symbol. Baptim is a small scale illustration."
More BS. I call BS on your entire argument. Try selling that argument in Houston *now*. You think the average Houstonian feels "clean", Mr. Sensitive? Or, go argue with the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. It hears more of your arguments than I do.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
27. Technically he is correct?
Fri Nov 30, 2018, 01:33 PM
Nov 2018

Rising sea levels are a result of climate change cause by man-made emissions, so God is not flooding the world again, man is.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»God breaks his promise