Religion
Related: About this forumExclusive poll: Most Americans say religion will live on
From the article:
To read more:
https://www.axios.com/millennials-organized-religion-generation-ac6a43d5-2f14-4092-bc67-0032d071e8cf.html
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)are so delusional. Helps explain things like Trump and climate change denying, doesn't it?
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)A majority of Chinese citizens are atheists. So how does that influence their behavior?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)Why are you bringing up Chinese atheists in this context?
And yeah, believing in irrational things is a problem.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)By implication, non-theists must be realists.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)are so delusional. Helps explain things like Trump and climate change denying, doesn't it?
I made the connection that you were describing theists as delusional. Feel free to elaborate on what you said.
Eko
(8,492 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)Which is why you are singularly unpopular here.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)You were given the chance to clarify what appears to be an attack on theists.
You chose to resort to ad hominem.
So, what does that say?
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)You did what you're always accusing others of doing. We can all see the posts, you know.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)For whom do you speak?
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Read the thread again.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)you reframed what I said and misstated it.
If it's an ad hominen attack to point out what you do all the time, I guess it's an ad hominem attack.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)you said:
are so delusional. Helps explain things like Trump and climate change denying, doesn't it?
I gave my interpretation, and you denied what I read, and refused to clarify what you meant.
So I did not reframe, I pasted your exact words.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)you changed my statement that many people are delusional to theists are delusional. That's imputing something I did not say. If my statement isn't clear to you, then it's your reading comprehension that's at fault.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)and that this is the religion group,
and you talked about delusional people,
forgive me for interpreting the many people as referring to theists.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)You deliberately made my statement into something it was not.
Mariana
(15,120 posts)Look at the famous and very influential preachers who publicly support Trump. They wouldn't do it if they were losing followers because of it. If anything, their enthusiastic cheerleading has made them even more popular - and wealthier - than they were before.
Climate change denial makes perfect sense, too. If people believe God is in control of that kind of thing, of course they are going to laugh at the idea that the activities of human beings can have any effect.
Right now, it seems impossible that the influence of religion on our political process will decrease any time soon. However, I remember when it seemed that same sex marriage would never be permitted, and that marijuana would always be illegal. Things can and do change, sometimes for the better.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 29, 2018, 10:26 AM - Edit history (1)
Whatever forces made that so in the past are still at work today, and are likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Thanks.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)to public opinion. Science, for example. Polls about beliefs regarding, say the theory of evolution, are common. Some attempt to use such polls to argue against evolution, as though people's opinions about it have something to do with whether the theory is accurate or not.
For example, someone might quote a poll like this:
Polls show that 75% of people believe that there is a deity.
Someone might believe that such polls have some relevance to the question. They do not, of course. If someone argues that they do, they are illogical and have fallen prey to the ad populum fallacy.
We see such sophistry frequently presented here by some participants in this Group. When the fallacy is explained, they reject the argument. Odd, that.
edhopper
(34,836 posts)"what people think".
I would prefer rational and scientific thought as a basis.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And when polls suggest that fewer people are formally religious, those are praised by some few as being "proof" that people are turning away from religion.
edhopper
(34,836 posts)but birthrates will keep the supply of religious going.
I don't think religion is going away either.
Of course asking Americas what they think about the future is a fools errand.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)edhopper
(34,836 posts)a fortune cookie?
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Perhaps I could have a new career?
edhopper
(34,836 posts)lucky number?
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Listen with your mind's ear.
edhopper
(34,836 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)There, I did it. Play that number tomorrow.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Thank you for your cooperation.
Major Nikon
(36,900 posts)Voltaire2
(14,719 posts)it was about the future existence of organized religion.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)It's interesting to see, but really doesn't tell us anything aside from what people think. It's like asking people if they think climate change is a problem. Their answer is meaningless aside from what the public perception is.
As you say, belief isn't based in facts.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)but even I would respond to this survey saying that religion will never go away.
I mean, I know why guillaumeb is excited by this and felt the need to post it - he doesn't understand what it really means, and just jumped to the conclusion that it supports his beliefs. As he has done so many times, humiliating himself in the process.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I pointed out that an article he posted actually says the opposite of what he claims and have endured a whole subthread of baseless abuse because of it. It's nothing new really.