Religion
Related: About this forumOn Rape/Sexual Assault Tropes in Muslim Communities - An Islamic Response (Part II)
From the article:
To read more:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/altmuslim/2018/10/on-rape-sexual-assault-tropes-in-muslim-communities-an-islamic-response-part-ii/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Muslim&utm_content=49
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Part I of which we have not seen, I am at a loss to guess at what your point might be. If it is that some people, regardless of their religious beliefs or lack of same, rape and molest, that is not news of any kind. It has been so always.
If you have some other point you are trying to make, single paragraph-fragments of longer articles are not adequate, as exemplified in this OP. You are allowed up to 4 paragraphs for an excerpt. Why post just one that illustrates no particular point we can identify, aside from an obvious one everybody already knows?
You also did not comment on your excerpt, so we have no idea whatever of your reason for posting it.
Finally, since I could find no relevance to any point being made, I was not moved to visit the link.
Copy and paste more of things, Guy. That requires no additional effort. Make comments on why you think we should visit your links. That's my advice, which I'm certain you will ignore.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)If the fragment does not tempt you, I understand because many of your articles expounding on your thoughts strike me in much the same way.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)I bring mine here. You bring the thoughts of others, or fragments of those thoughts. One has to wonder what thoughts you might have.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)better and more effective, like copying and pasting longer excerpts and adding your own comments. I even explained why those were good ideas. You responded with a poorly concealed personal attack.
That's very interesting.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)I understand your apparent need to expound on your ideas.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)If you think something I have written is a personal attack, you can alert on that post.
Disagreement is not a personal attack.
Stating a position in opposition to your statements is not a personal attack.
Pointing out a logical error in one of your posts is not a personal attack.
Suggesting that you post more from a link is not a personal attack.
When I "expound on my ideas," that is not a personal attack.
Discussing things from my point of view is not a personal attack.
Calling someone a member of some imagined "choir" could be seen as a personal attack, though.
Making false accusations of personal attacks could be seen as a personal attack.
I do not alert on replies to my posts, even when they contain personal attacks. Ever.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)So when you make numerous posts "wondering" about the intellectual capabilities of those with whom you disagree, these are not personal attacks?
Interesting.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)I'll check back later.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Far easier. Remove the beam and see clearly.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)Sorry. Please try again.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Have a nice day. Time for a walk.
MineralMan
(147,591 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)You know, all the horrible evil atheist religious bigots who claim that only Muslims rape.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Feel free to cite the relevant portions to support your interesting viewpoint.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Perhaps you should be the change you want to see.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)Your demonstrated behavior was noted.