Bill would create 'no-fly' list for unruly passengers

[Eugene]

Related: TO PREVENT VIOLENT ‘AIR RAGE’ INCIDENTS FROM TAKING OFF, REED, SWALWELL & FITZPATRICK INTRODUCE BILL TO GROUND UNRULY PASSENGERS

______________________________________________________________________

Source: Washington Post

Bill would create ‘no-fly’ list for unruly passengers

There has been a rise in incidents aboard commercial airplanes, including assaults on crew members

By Lori Aratani
Today at 5:34 p.m. EDT|Updated today at 5:58 p.m. EDT

Lawmakers introduced legislation Wednesday to create a “no-fly” list for unruly passengers, part of an effort to address the rise of violent incidents in airplanes.

Under “The Protection From Abusive Passengers Act” unveiled by Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), people convicted of assaulting crew members aboard an aircraft could be placed on a “no-fly” list that would be maintained by the Transportation Security Administration. Those individuals also could be barred from special programs that allow for expedited passenger screening, including TSA’s PreCheck program and Global Entry, which is managed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

“We’re here today to stand up for the 99.99999 percent of travelers who’ve had enough of bad behavior,” Reed said. “There should be zero tolerance for violence aboard an airplane. This bill will help reduce incidents of in-flight violence and hold unruly passengers accountable if they break the law.”

-snip-

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2022/04/06/no-fly-list-unruly-passengers-tsa/

Non-paywalled link: https://wapo.st/3uf9JaW

[raccoon]

1. It's about time! I'm glad one Republican is associated with this bill.

It’s about time! I’m glad one Republican is associated with this bill. Otherwise, it’s certain that every Republican would vote against it, just to be jackasses.

[RobertDevereaux]

2. A never-fly-again list is what's needed.

[Golden Raisin]

7. And on ALL airlines.

[2naSalit]

3. K&R

[PoliticAverse]

4. At least is required a conviction unlike the regular 'no f!y'all list. n/t

[3Hotdogs]

5. If they ain't gonna be able to fly, why would they be on the expedited screening list anyway?

It don't make sense.

[babylonsister]

6. Good!! nt

[Nululu]

8. Not enough. Put them on the list for violating law

People might plea down the charges, they should bar any assaults in the air or failure to follow instructions.

[Callalily]

9. Let's just hope this will deter people

from acting crazy, but frankly I'm doubtful.